Showing posts with label Lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lies. Show all posts

12/10/2013

ObamaCare: You Can't Keep Your Prescriptions Either!

Posted by Brian

So far, you can't keep your:

  • Current Health Plan
  • Doctor
  • Hospital
  • Prescription Drugs
Oh, and by the way, you won't save $2500 per year in premiums.  Instead your will be forced into a more expensive plan with higher deductibles and fewer benefits.

If a private company were to have sold this to the American people telling the same lies that Obama and the Democrats have told, their CEO and executives would be going to jail.



No, You Can't Keep Your Drugs Either Under Obamacare

The President famously promised that you could keep your health plan and doctor. For many people, both of those pledges are turning out to be false. And now, you might not be able to keep your medicine, either.

There are two reasons why. The first has to do with the higher out of pocket costs patients will face. The second issue may be even more significant.

Simply put, many drugs may not be covered at all, and the costs patients incur by buying them with cash won’t count against out of pocket caps. This has repercussions for drug makers with big portfolios of specialty and primary care drugs (more on that later). But most of all, it has implications for patients.

Drugs on your health plan’s formulary will typically have fixed co-pays. These costs usually count toward your deductible and the out of pocket and lifetime limits on the total amount of money that your health plan can ask you to spend.
Continue Reading at Forbes
Enhanced by Zemanta

12/05/2013

Who's Lying? Lying Liar Obama or His Drunken Uncle Onyango?

Posted by Brian

Is there nothing that this President will not lie about? In 2011. following the DUI arrest of the President's Uncle Onyango "Omar" Obama, the President claimed he had never met his uncle.  Now, two years later, Onyango is telling a deportation judge that not only had Barack Obama and he
 met, they had actually lived together for several weeks in the 1980's.  It might be easy to chalk this up as a he said/he said story if it were not for Onyango's former landlord, who also testified that the future President did in fact live with his uncle during that time.

Oops.

Now, if Obama is able to so easily lie about something so trivial, is it really that difficult to believe that he is lying about some of the really big things? You know, like his knowledge and actions on Benghazi, Fast and Furious, NSA spying, using the IRS to intimidate political enemies, or lying to the American people to sell ObamaCare?

No, this is not the kind of thing to bring down a President.  It only adds one more piece to the case that this President and his Administration are THE most corrupt U.S. administration in history.


Obama’s uncle contradicts White House, says Obama stayed with him in 1980s
BY AARON BLAKE
December 3 at 3:50 pm
President Obama's uncle said at a deportation hearing Tuesday that Obama stayed with him while he was a student at Harvard Law School in the 1980s — despite the White House having said that Obama never met the man.
Read More at The Washington Post
Enhanced by Zemanta

12/02/2013

Muslim Rep. Ellison Uses 'Taqiyya' to Defend Obama's Healthcare Lies

Posted by Brian
H/T to Breitbart.com for the Video

Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) put the Muslim practice of "taqiyya" into full effect Sunday, fabricating a lie to protect the President from the lie he told the American people. Taquiya, which literally means "concealing, precaution, guarding”, is the Islamic practice of lying if it promotes or protects your beliefs.
Ellison, who was on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopolous", told the host (and the American people):

"You know, I just want to say I think that  everything that the president said and did was in pursuit to get all Americans health care, so, I think, even though he may have said, if you like your decent insurance, your insurance that works, then you can keep it, I think that people really get that. When -- he owned it. He said, look, if you misunderstood what I was trying to say, I'm sorry about that. I think that shows integrity."

Of course, President Obama didn't say anything like that.  Obama was very unambiguous in his lie to the American people. What he said was this:
"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor."  "If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan." (Video)

Ellison also implies in this statement that, "Hey! It's not Obama's fault that Americans don't understand good English. But it goes to show just how wonderful Obama is! That even though the American people are idiots, Obama owned the "misunderstanding", and that goes to show just how honest and what a standup guy Obama is."  So what Ellison really appears to say is that the American people are at fault for this mess, because we are too stupid to to understand what Obama was trying to say, and that we should be grateful that Obama's good intentions.

What was it Obama said about putting lipstick on a pig?



Enhanced by Zemanta

8/11/2013

Affordable Care Act is Actually Obama's 'Holy Grail', not GOP's

Posted by Brian


One has to wonder when the American people are going to wake up to the lies and hyperbole that vomit out of the mouth of Barack Obama on a nearly daily basis.  We know that the press is in a state of perpetual slumber under the spell of Rip van Obama, so invested are they in protecting this President.  However, there are indications that many Americans have snapped out of their 2008 "Obama is the messiah" trance as the scandals have piled up, and a majority now oppose ObamaCare, now that we've "(found) out what's in it".

Obama is now complaining (when isn't he complaining) of Republicans saying that they will not pass a spending bill unless the hugely unpopular ObamaCare is defunded.  So unpopular is ObamaCare, that even Democrats like Jimmy Hoffa and the unions are now opposing it.  Predictably, Obama goes to his favorite tactic of dividing and demonizing his opponents, claiming that the GOP wants to ensure "that 30 million people don't have healthcare", calling it their "holy grail", and claiming they have an "ideological fixation".

This is the language of the leftist, taken right out of Saul Alinski, Karl Marx, Fidel Castro, and every other communist and despot throughout history.  It is meant to paint a mental picture, no matter how distorted, of his opponents as heartless ogres hell-bent on seeing Americans suffer and die.

Of course, this isn't new.  Democrats have long used this tactic to demonize Republicans on environmental issues, entitlement reform, immigration, and abortion.

How many times have we heard that the GOP wants to "starve children", as part and parcel of their debate over the federal school lunch program?  Or, that Republicans want dirty water and dirty air when the issue is job-killing radical environmentalist legislation?  Conservatives want to see women die in "back-alley" abortions, and tear apart families of illegal immigrants who flood into the country.

Does anyone honestly believe that the Party of Lincoln wants to kill women and children, poison the water supply, and pollute the environment? An intellectually honest person would have to admit that these are just slogans by a Democrat Party which does not want an honest debate on the merits of what they support, and so chooses to hurl baseless accusations as their debating tactic.

Sadly, for a dumbed-down, low-information electorate who react emotionally rather than intellectually, hyperbole is effective.

So it is that we have the Divider-in-Chief, Barack Obama, now claiming that Republicans want 30 million Americans to go without healthcare.  That is, evil Republicans want 30 million of you to die! But, where does Obama get this 30 million figure? What he fails to  acknowledge to his legions is that this 30 million figure comes from the Congressional Budget Office who determined that ObamaCare itself would leave that number uninsured. This, after claiming that failure to pass ObamaCare would keep 30 million Americans uninsured.

Obama goes on to claim that defunding or repealing ObamaCare is the "Holy Grail" of for the GOP, while neglecting to admit that it was he and the Democrat Party who rammed through his signature piece of legislation without a single Republican vote, and half of the country opposing the bill at the time it was passed.

In the four years hence, opposition to ObamaCare has strengthened, with polls showing over 50% favor full repeal of the law.  Even prior to the 2012 election, Gallup reported that 87% of Republicans, 43% of Independents, and 14% Democrats strongly or somewhat opposed ObamaCare, with 47% of all Americans favoring full repeal of the law.

Republican opposition to the law reflects the growing dissatisfaction and concerns of the American electorate, while it is Obama who is continuing to ram this down the throat of Americans who indicate that they don't want it.

Who is it, Mr. President, who really sees this law as the Holy Grail?

Related Stories:

Obama slams GOP over 'holy grail' of blocking healthcare law

 
Enhanced by Zemanta

6/05/2013

Chronicling the Obama Administration Lies: Eric Holder [Video]

Posted by Brian
H/T to The Blaze

Third of three-video compilation chronicling the numerous lies of the Obama Administration.

Exposing the lies of Eric Holder, Jay Carney, Obama, and numerous others in the "most transparent Administration in history".

Share freely to continue to expose this den of thieves.


Enhanced by Zemanta

6/04/2013

Obama: The Early Lies [Video 2 of 3]

Posted by Brian
H/T to The Blaze

2nd installment of three videos chronicling the lies of the Obama Administration.


Obama Admin Lies...In Their Own Words! [Video]

Posted by Brian
H/T to The Blaze

Glenn Beck and The Blaze put together and last night aired a compilation of the multitude of lies that have come out of the Obama Administration.

Viewed back-to-back, the clips illustrate a damning indictment of White House and Administration officials saying one thing one minute, and then completely contradicting themselves the next.

Remember the media marveling at the 2008 Obama campaign's ability to stay focused like a laser on their message?  Ironically, this same group over the next 5+ years has been incapable of staying on message from one moment to the next, whether it be addressing the media, on Sunday Morning talking head shows, of testifying under oath before Congress.

A must watch and share!  More to Come!




Enhanced by Zemanta

5/10/2013

OUTRAGE!! Hillary Clinton Not Sworn In For Benghazi Testimony!

Posted by Brian

Hillary Clinton goes before both a Senate AND House investigative committee to testify, and NO ONE thinks to swear her in under oath?
This whole thing stinks to high heaven!

HILLARY MISLED CONGRESS--BUT NOT UNDER OATH
by JOEL B. POLLAK  9 May 2013

Hillary Clinton's Benghazi "Testimony" not under oath
Wednesday's testimony on the Benghazi terror attacks by State Department whistleblowers before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform contradicted several statements by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in testimony before House and Senate committees in January.

However, while Clinton may have misled Congress in her testimony, she likely did not commit perjury because she never actually testified under oath.

Video recordings of Clinton's Jan. 23 testimony before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee suggest that she was never sworn in. Breitbart News subsequently confirmed with staff on both committees that she did not take an oath to tell "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth," as the three witnesses, all career civil servants, did Wednesday before the House Oversight Committee.
Read More At Breitbart.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

2/21/2013

Americans' and GOP Being Played by Obama on Sequestration

The American Public is being Duped! The Sequester is the Least of Our Problems!
Everyone is all in a tizzy over the upcoming sequestration.  Massive cuts to the military, border control, the FBI, federal prosecutors, transportation, education (every good liberal plan always has to be about how it hurts the children), and a host of other things are being thrown around.  Make no mistake, Obama will allow the cuts to unfold, and then promptly blame the Republicans for all of it.  The whole thing is political gamesmanship meant to destroy the GOP, and Obama is light years ahead of GOP leaders Boehner, Cantor, and the rest of this feckless bunch.

Keep in mind also, that we are talking about $85 Billion in so-called "cuts". This represents about 2% of the overall federal budget.  It wasn't that long ago that the Federal Government was able to "find" $60 Billion overnight for Hurricane Sandy Relief, which was loaded with pork-barrel spending having nothing to do with "relief" (Link).  You know? The one "Krispy Kreme" Christie squealed (Link) about like a stuck pig? But yet, they can't find $85B worth of waste in the tangled bureaucracy of D.C. to avoid these automatic cuts?

Of course, the cuts won't come from non-essential services, or those mandated by the Constitution to be the primary purpose of the Federal government.  No, instead our elected officials will continue to fund things like paying senior citizens $1.2 million to play video games, so we can study their effect on them.(link) Then there is the essential service of spending $2.2 Billion a year to provide free cell phones to people, because we all know that having a cell phone has now been reclassified as a basic human right. How about $4 million to build the IRS its own TV studio?  Who could oppose that essential spending? Of course, we all know that it is essential that the government provide all-expense paid trips to federal employees for conferences in Las Vegas and Hawaii at a cool million dollars a pop.

I can think of aanother quick way to save money right off of the top.  How about Barack Obama cuts the number of vacations, golf trips, and other non-essential trips he takes by half.  This would save $700 MILLION per year of the estimated $1.4 BILLION (link) he and his family currently cost.  (In contrast, England's Royal Family cost the British $60 million a year.) He might even be able to save more if he can convince Michelle to actually ride on the same plane as him, instead of taking earlier flights when he is held up by actually performing Presidential duties.  I know its a huge sacrifice for her to make, but in the interest of actually appearing that she gives a crap about the rest of the serfs around the country, this might be a nice gesture.

Of course, none of this is going to happen.  The whole sequester song-and-dance act is not about coming up with budget solutions, else Harry Reid would have brought a budget to the Senate floor at least once during the last 4 years, as he is required by law to do. But, why worry about the law when the whole purpose is to create a fiscal crisis and blame it on the Republicans?

Also keep in mind that the sequester is the idea of the Obama White House, which he now blames on the GOP.  (Link) Let's be clear.  Obama is lying!  The Washington Post, which is liberal, gives Obama "Four Pinocchio's" out of four on his claim.

Back in July of 2011, White House national economic Director Jack Sperling said that the White House proposed the idea of the sequester. It was then brought to Senate Majority Leader Reid, who it was said looked like he wanted to "throw up" when he was first  told.  They then explained to him that it would work because they "would design it so that half the threatened cuts would be from the Defense Department….The idea was to make all of the threatened cuts so unthinkable and onerous that the supercommittee (tasked with making additional cuts) would do its work and come up with its own deficit reduction plan".

 Remember back in 2011when President Obama supported the sequester cuts?  Now, on February 19, 2013, he gives a speech on how devastating they will be.


The sequestration is a political calculation, not an economic solution, perpetrated by, and being carried out by, the White House, for two years. It is a plan to corner Republicans, not to cut spending, but to allow Obama and the Democrats to continue spending at unsustainable rates (GAO analysis, not mine) for the foreseeable future.  The Republican leadership, under Boehner, who moronically signed onto the plan only weeks after the original proposal, is too stupid to explain it to the American people. Furthermore, the mainstream media is complicit in furthering the propaganda from Obama and the Democrats in convincing the American people that this is a Republican plan, and that it is their fault.  Worse, most Americans are completely unaware of the coming economic collapse being purposefully driven by this Administration, statist Democrats, and big government Republican leadership, because of the media's total dereliction in providing people actual facts, choosing instead to provide White House talking points  in print ond on the "news" programming.

Sadly, if there is not one person, Republican or Democrat, who is willing to stand up to Obama and the White House and put a halt to his agenda and his spending, the sequestration will be nothing compared to the economic disaster that is looming in the near future.

Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/23/2013

Are we being told the truth about Sandy Hook?

Posted by Tom






 On April 4, 2009, three Pittsburgh Police Officers were killed.  Here is a portion of the story printed by the New York Daily News, amongst many other media outlets:

"Richard Poplawski, 23, met officers at the doorway and shot two of them in the head immediately, Harper said. An officer who tried to help the two also was killed.  Poplawski, armed with an assault rifle and two other guns, then held police at bay for four hours as the fallen officers were left bleeding nearby, their colleagues unable to reach them, according to police and witnesses. More than 100 rounds were fired by the elite police teams and Poplawski, Harper said."



This horrific crime was perpetrated against some very brave Officers who were doing nothing more than coming to the aid of those hey had sworn to protect and serve.  Sadly, several of these fine Officers left behind small children.  The Community did an incredible job coming together to support their families and honor their sacrifice.  This was an almost incomprehensible loss to the the City of Pittsburgh, the Pittsburgh Police and most of all, the loved ones they left behind.

Within a few days of this horrific event, I received a phone call from a personal friend who works within local law enforcement.  He explained to me that these three Officers were killed at close range with a SHOTGUN, not the "assault rifle" that the media continued to repeat hour after hour, day after day.
I decided to look into this further and began asking questions.  After a period of time, I was able to locate both of the Federally Licensed Dealers who sold the guns used by the shooter.  The owners of both stores reported to me that Agents from the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms had confirmed that the actual murder weapon was the shotgun and NOT the assault rifle that was reported to have been present on the scene.  To this day even some members of law enforcement, and the vast majority of the public believe they were killed with an "assault weapon."  This is blatantly false.

Let's fast forward to the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary......

Within hours of this tragedy, LT Paul Vance of the Connecticut State Police stated that two handguns were found at the crime scene, in the school near the shooter, and that an AR-15 rifle was found in the trunk of a car believed to have been driven to the scene by the shooter, Adam Lanza.  This briefing by LT Vance was given in the early afternoon of December 14, 2012 and I heard it with my own ears.  I have been unable to find a video clip of this live interview anywhere on the internet, for whatever reason.  Later, multiple media sources also reported that that the AR15 was found in the trunk of the car and was reportedly verified by multiple sources.

Here is a video that asks many questions.  I think it's important to note that during a rapidly developing situation like this, the "fog of war" is often responsible for a lot of  misinformation, etc., and not intentional misrepresentation.  This is a very well known phenomena.
 


WATCH THIS!    The MOST LEFT WING MEDIA IN THE NATION EVEN ACKNOWLEDGES IT!


In the big picture, what I have learned is this.  The media as a whole is driven not only by their desire to increase viewership, but to further the personal agendas of those who typically lean to the far left of the political center.   Sensationalizing stories and reporting unconfirmed information increases viewership, which translates directly to increased revenue through advertising.  What is reported has little to do with FACT, A LOT to do with conjecture, making money and for some, hood winking the American people into thinking their Kool-Aid is not only good, but safe to drink..



12/03/2012

SEIU Lies To Its Members To Foment Hate Toward Fast-Food Chain Wendy's

Posted by Brian

SEIU recruits useful idiots to strike for entry-level $15 burger flipper jobs.
Since the reelection of "The One" to a second term, unions have been emboldened in their quest to increase their membership.  None has been more out in front of this than SEIU.  Also, none has been more blatantly dishonest.
Keen to capitalize on Obama's class warfare message, SEIU has sent out an e-mail (below), supposedly written by a worker at Wendy's, that its CEO clears $16.5 BILLION, while he struggles to live on $16 thousand.

The disparity between the CEO is massive.  One problem.  It's an outright lie.  The CEO has an annual salary of $338K, and with compensation, earns a little over $4.5 million. A lot of money, yes.  But well over 300 times less than the SEIU letter informs its members.  But this doesn't matter to SEIU.  What matters is that many of the lemmings who comprise their membership will believe it.  It also matters to SEIU that their members believe that if the CEO made less, it will improve their economic well-being.
This is the thinking of the leftist mind.  That a person who flips burgers for a living believes that he or she should be payed a salary which will support an entire family is the mentality.  What was once considered an entry level job is now, in the minds of these leftists, supposed to be a career.
What you won't hear from the SEIU leadership though are the six-figure salaries they make, all paid for with dues from their members.  Here are just a few union president's and their salaries:

National Education Association President, Dennis Van Roekel - $397,721
SEIU - former president, Andy Stern - $306,388 (No info on current SEIU President Mary Kay Henry
Teamsters  president, James P. Hoffa - $362,869
AFSCME President Gerald McEntee - $479,328 
Laborers International Union President Terence O’Sullivan - $618,000

Not exactly chump change.  But you can bet your ass that they aren't advertising that each of them, and scores of others in union leadership positions, are drawing six-figure CEO-type salaries. No, they gladly accept their six-figure salary, meals at 4-star restaurants, and the occasional audience with the President, provided by the labor and sweat from the backs of the workers. In exchange, they have the job of keeping their members in constant turmoil over the "unfairness" of the system, while fostering a mindset of victimhood within the membership. 

If lying is required to do this, so be it.  Like all good communist revolutionaries, the rule is:

"By any means necessary"

All these unions will do is turn the 99 cent menu into the $99 menu 
The Lies The SEIU Tells Its Members
- Warner Todd Huston

This week the SEIU sent out an email to its members hoping to drum up some hate against the fast food chain Wendy’s. The email not only had one outright lie, it was also a sad example of how stupid unions think their members really are.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

11/28/2012

Benghazi: Obama "Unconcerned" That Rice Lied, or Who Changed CIA Assessment

Posted by Brian

It is now 78 days since the attack in Benghazi, which killed four Americans, including an Ambassador and two Navy SEAL's.  What have we "officially" learned about the attacks and who was responsible for it?  Thanks to this Administration, not much.  Nor does it appear they will be anymore forthcoming in the coming days/weeks/months, if ever.  In fact, WH spokesman Jay Carney tells us that Barack Obama is "unconcerned" with the fact that his Administration has misled  (Washington-speak for "lied") the American people, or that it appears that all of his talk of letting the "investigation" play out is nothing but a smokescreen.
If there is an investigation, I don't believe it is coming from any orders from the White House.  In fact, I believe they are putting up as many roadblocks as they can to hinder whatever investigations are occurring.
Anything that has been discovered up to this point has not come from the White House, but from a few intrepid reporters, and a few members of Congress who have looked into this.  Virtually all of the "facts" initially put out by this Administration have been debunked in their entirety.  Allegations as to reasons for the attack, such as the existence of a possible CIA detention facility in Benghazi, or maybe even more damaging, a weapons running operation to aid opposition forces in Syria, have been neither debunked or confirmed. The Obama Administration has simply chosen to ignore them, as it does all other things which show unfavorably on this Administration, and which they can be assured that a complicit media will give them cover on as well. The crazy thing is this: if the Obama Administration had just said from the beginning that the attackers were al Qaeda, instead of the reaction of a bunch of non-existent protestors to an obscure YouTube video, that probably would have been the end of it.  Instead, it continues to be the original lies which continue to fan the flames of a White House cover-up.
Nearly three months after the attacks, about the only thing that Barack Obama and his Administration have said is that they are "awaiting the findings"of what may be the longest "investigation" into the reasons behind a terrorist act in U.S. history, and that the President is fully supportive of those who lied to the American people, whether it be Susan Rice, or those who, for whatever reason, changed the CIA assessment which eliminated any mention of terrorism, and continued to ape their original story, that the attack was about a movie, for over a week, even after it was proven what they were saying was a lie.
If only Obama showed as much support for those Americans' on the ground in Benghazi as he does for his inner circle, maybe they would still be alive.

WH: Obama 'Is Not Particularly Concerned' Whether Susan Rice Misled the American People



From CBS:
Who changed the Benghazi talking points?

From The Weekly Standard
Obama: 'Susan Rice Is Extraordinary. Couldn't Be Prouder of the Job She's Done.'
Enhanced by Zemanta

11/12/2012

Former CIA Officer: White House Is Lying About Petraeus Scandal

Posted by Brian
H/T Breitbart

"They're Lying!"
Former CIA Officer Gary Bernstein told Fox News that the White House is "lying" about when they knew about the affair which caused CIA Director David Petraeus to resign the day after the election.

Bernstein says that for the FBI to be "intercepting e-mails and reading the CIA Director emails and not reporting that to the White House is bull!"

The implication in all of this is that the White House has known, and has been holding this over Petraeus' head, in effect blackmailing him, as a means to keep him from testifying to Congress on what he knows about Benghazi, and the White House's role regarding a lack of support to the four American's killed in the attack, as well as what intelligence there was prior to the attack which may have prevented the deaths.

It has already been established that the original reason given by the Obama Administration for the attack, that it was because of a YouTube video which insulted Mohammed, was patently false, and in fact caused riots across the Middle East after the White House brought it to the forefront.

In addition, there have now been leaks, including from Petraeus' mistress, that the attacks were aimed at a secret CIA prison, or that the Obama Administration was engaging in a type of gun-running operation to jihadists which would be used to oust Syrian dictator Assad, and that this is the real reason that the Administration has been involved in a misinformation campaign and coverup about what really happened and the reason behind it.



Enhanced by Zemanta

11/08/2012

WH Makes Benghazi Docs Available For 2 Days...When Senators Are Out Of Town

Posted by Brian

The Benghazi story is not going away because the election is over.  Four Americans are dead!
In their continuing contempt for the American people and the ongoing lack of transparency from the Obama Administration, the White House has agreed to release documents regarding the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, where four Americans were killed by Al Qaeda terrorists on September 11th, 2012.  However, they are only making them available for two days, which coincidentally happen to be when most Senators are out of town.

Obama's supporters may find this amusing, and I'm sure that those in the White House are having a good laugh at their "cleverness" in this cat-and-mouse game that Obama and his administration are playing with Congress, but the facts are these:

Four Americans are dead.
The White House AND the State Department were warned ahead of time that Al Qaeda were assembling forces for an attack.
Beefed up security was requested several times prior to the attack, and was denied.
The attack was watched in "real time" by the White House and others.
Requests for support were requested and denied at least three times during the attack.
Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods "painted" an Al Qaeda mortar team position with a laser, prior to being killed from that same location.  He would not, and could not, paint the location without  an uplink to a laser-guided weapon in the area, which Defense Secretary Panetta and the White House have said were not in the area.
A YouTube video was NOT what triggered the attack, so why was that the initial story released by the White House?

There are many other questions as to what was known, who knew it, who made the decision not to provide support, and others.  That the Obama Administration is treating this as some sort of game of keep-away, and refusing to tell the American people the truth about what happened  in Benghazi, points out, at the very least, that there is a lot that this administration is hiding, and that a cover-up is being waged on a large scale

The question is "Why"?

Benghazi documents available to senators only when they are out of town
Posted By Josh Rogin   Thursday, November 8, 2012 - 12:16 PM

Under pressure from senators, the State Department is allowing some lawmakers to look at cables and other documents related to the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, but only today and tomorrow, when most senators are not in Washington.

Congress is gearing up for a full week of Benghazi-related hearings next week, including a Nov. 13 hearing behind closed doors of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, led by Chairman John Kerry (D-MA). Kerry has written two letters to the State Department requesting congressional access to information and documents related to the circumstances leading up to and during the attack that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens. Several sensitive documents have already been leaked to congressional offices and the media, so the State Department has decided to let some senators view Benghazi documents but not take them home.
Enhanced by Zemanta

10/22/2012

1000's Call Planned Parenthood To Expose Obama's False Mammogram Claims

Posted by Brian

With the President routinely using mammograms as a major reason for the continuation of federal funding of Planned Parenthood, some enterprising women organized an event to call Planned Parenthood to schedule their "imaginary" mammograms.  Thousands did.  The event was so successful that Planned Parenthood issued a statement to say that the President is "wrong", and that they do not provide mammogram services.
Checkmate, Mr. President!

Thousands call Planned Parenthood for mammograms after Obama's claim
By Carl Bunderson Denver, Colo., Oct 20, 2012 / 06:30 pm (EWTN News)


Nearly 2,000 pro-lifers called local Planned Parenthood clinics Oct. 18 to schedule mammograms, after President Obama implied the organization offers the service.

"When Gov. Romney says that we should eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood, there are millions of women all across the country who rely on Planned Parenthood for not just contraceptive care, they rely on it for mammograms,” said Obama Oct. 16 during the second presidential debate.
 
Planned Parenthood does not actually provide women with mammograms, but refers patients out to other facilities for the exam.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta