MSNBC's 'Censorship' Journalist Arrested For Painting Over Free Speech

Posted by Brian
Eltahawy being arrested for vandalism
Egyptian-American journalist Mona Eltahawy, a leftist Islamist apologist and sometime MSNBC pundit, found herself being arrested for vandalism of a Pro-Israel poster in the NY subway. While Eltahawy may have found it offensive, the fact is that the poster was approved by the city. Yet, like so many of her fellow leftists, free speech is a wonderful thing, only as long as they agree with it.  Then it becomes "hate speech", which must of course be abolished and outlawed.  Her solution? Spray paint the poster. and anybody who stands between her and the poster.

Just who  are these sages who determine what is correct speech, and what is hate speech?  Why, good little leftists like this jerk.  The morally superior attitude of Eltahawy and her ilk is obvious, who when being told that she is being arrested, claims to be exercising her "right of free expression", blames the police for violating her "right to free expression",  and tells others that "this is what happens to non-violent protestors in the United States in 2012".

No genius! This is what happens to jerks like you who deface private and public property because you don't happen to agree with it.

From NewsBusters
CNN and MSNBC Pundit Arrested for Vandalizing Anti-Muslim Ad In N.Y. Subway System

The New York Post reported Egyptian-American columnist Mona Eltahawy has been arrested for defacing an anti-Muslim ad in the New York subway system. The video shows her spraying pink paint on the ad while a supporter of the ad tries to block her. She's a journalist for censorship.

Eltahawy, a former Reuters correspondent, has been a recent favorite of CNN and MSNBC’s weekend morning shows to discuss Egypt, and she often smears together the Islamist “right wing” and the American right wing, as she did on Melissa Harris-Perry just 11 days ago [video and transcript below]:
Continue Reading

Enhanced by Zemanta

While Middle East Burns and Economy Teeters, Obama Focuses On NFL Replacement Refs

Posted by Brian
It's obvious that the President is a big fan of sports. He frequently inserts himself into discussions of both pro and amateur sports, including his annual televised NCAA Bracket Picks, fancying himself as the new "Jimmy the Greek". You would think he would have the common sense to at least not give the appearance of being out of touch, what with some of the serious issues facing the country, and the rest of the world.
Riots in Greece and Spain. The Middle and Near East are on fire with anti-American Islamists protesting. China is threatening war with Japan.  The U.S. economy is teetering on the edge of the fiscal cliff. Yet, what is the picture being painted by the White House?  Barack Obama sitting in front of a big-screen TV, upset over a controversial call in the Seahawks/Packers game!

Is this what Barack Obama calls being "in touch" with the American people?  Ignoring real problems which hold real consequences for the American people, while being concerned about whether a referee made the correct call?

There have been others, including some who have ties to the White House and this President, who have said that Barack Obama likes campaigning, but is just "bored" in actually doing the day-to-day work that is involved with being the President, or that he doesn't like work.

That being the case, voters should do him a favor and fire him so he can find a job that doesn't bore him or that he does like.

WH: President Obama 'thinks there were real problems with the call' made by replacement refs in Packers game
September 25, 2012 | 1:46 pm

Speaking with the press today aboard Air Force One, Press Secretary Jay Carney said that the president believed “there was a real problem with the call" by replacement referees last night during the Packers/Seahawks game.  

"He said that what happened in that game is a perfect example of why both sides need to come together, resolve their differences so that the regular refs can get back on the field and we can start focusing on a game that so many of us love rather than debating whether of not a game is won or lost because of a bad call," Carney said. "He thinks there were real problems with the call."
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

Poll: 69% of Business Owners Say Obama Policies Hurt Their Business

Posted by Brian

55 percent of small business owners would not start company today, blame Obama
September 26, 2012 | 10:39 am

Fifty-five percent of small business owners and manufacturers would not have started their businesses in today’s economy, according to a new poll that also reports 69 percent say President Obama’s regulatory policies have hurt their businesses
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta


Clueless Obama Voters Think Bin Laden's Alive, Romney Is Black,

H/T to The Blaze

Howard Stern Man On The Street Interview Exposes Ignorance Of Some Obama Voters...AGAIN!
You have to listen to the absolute cluelessness of the individuals being interviewed by a Howard Stern Show employee.  All self-identify as Obama voters.

To think that my vote,  and YOURS, is being cancelled out by someone who doesn't know who is running for President , is completely ignorant of the issues, current events, history, and life in general is a travesty on the largest scale.

Why do we have complete morons running the country?  Because we have intellectually challenged idiots like this voting them into office.

This would be funny if it weren't so sad.

Howard Stern Exposes Obama Supporters 2012 (Official)

Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta


Frances Fox Piven Warns That 'Occupy' Far From Over

Posted by Brian
Frances Fox Piven, who with the late Richard Cloward, penned the "Cloward-Piven Strategy" for collapsing the capitalist system, is saying that the Occupy Movement is just beginning.

Frances Piven, who attempts to present herself as some harmless little grandmother type is anything but. She is a hard-left Marxist and member of the "Democrat Socialists of America", who's goal is the destruction of the United States as a capitalist democracy, and to transform it into a Marxist dictatorship.

She advocates "guaranteed annual incomes", and was a major force behind "Motor Voter" laws, which have increased the amount of illegal aliens being allowed to register to vote, as well as increased the likelihood of voter fraud. She has also stated "We desperately need a popular uprising."

Piven's claim is not to be taken lightly.

Occupy's protest is not over. It has barely begun

It's mistaken to write Occupy's obituary this first anniversary: the lesson of history is that movements for justice are irrepressible
Frances Fox Piven guardian.co.uk, Monday 17 September 2012 09.49 EDT

A good many observers wonder, is Occupy over? After all, the encampments that announced the movement a year ago have largely disappeared, and no obviously similar protest demonstrations of young people have taken their place, at least not in the United States.

Nevertheless, I think the ready conclusion that the protests have fizzled is based on a misconception of the nature of movements, a misconception influenced by the metaphors we rely on. We think of these eruptions as something like explosions, Fourth of July fireworks perhaps that shoot into the sky, dazzle us for a moment, and then quickly fade away. The metaphor leads us to think of protest movements as bursts of energy and anger that rise in a great arc and then, exhausted, disappear.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta


Romney 2011Tax Return: Paid 14.1% In Taxes, 29% Of Income To Charity

Posted by Brian

Well, the big day is here! Mitt Romney has released his tax return for 2011! And...I could care less.

All of the run up to this, with the Democrats and the media trying to turn this election into how much Mitt Romney pays in taxes is asinine.  And a distraction from the real issues facing our country.

Unemployment is still sky high, Total workforce participation is at an all time low, more people giving up looking for a job than are finding one.  Our foreign policy is in shambles. The Middle East and Islamic countries are on fire, the result of a failed foreign policy and a President seen as weak and feckless (sorry libs, but it's not about a movie). Iran is ready to go nuclear, and Israel is preparing to go it alone, as Obama makes it clear that he is not an ally of Benyamin Netanyahu and Israel, even if the vast majority of Americans are.

Yet, the media is concerned with how much Mitt Romney pays in taxes. Well, we now have the answer.  A lot. Seven figures. Three times what Obama pays.  "But, but, Mitt Romney only pays 14.1 percent in taxes and Obama payed 20percent!"  I guess Romney has better accountants than Barack Obama. OR, maybe its because he gave over $4 million to charity, thus lowering his taxable income!  It must be that he trusts himself with where his money is spent than the Federal government.  One other little side note: Romney didn't even clam all of his charitable deductions! Thus, his taxable percentage was even higher than it could have been.  In other words, he voluntarily payed even more than he was required to. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it, Harry Reid! By the way Harry, You owe Mitt Romney a public apology.  I won't hold my breath. It's already proven that you have no honor.

Since the Dems are so concerned with  Romney paying his "fair share", let's take a look at good old Joe Biden (video below), who said of the "wealthy" in regard to taxes and being greedy:

"Time to be Patriotic. Time jump in. Time to be a part of the deal."

Well, since Joe is so generous with other people's money, how generous is he with his own?
From 1998-2007, generous Joe gave an average of $369, or .3% a year to charity. His generosity is stunning. Most military men and women give more to through Combined Federal Campaign charity drives each year.  And trust me, they make nowhere near what a Congressman makes.  Since becoming Vice President though,  Jumpin' Joe has upped his charitable donations to over $5000, or 1.46% of his income. Wow, Joe! Looks like you need to jump in, and be part of the game, because right now you are barely getting your toe wet.

The fact is, I am just glad that this is out of the way. It's just an annoyance.  Of course the media is going to point out the Obama payed 20%, but that is easily parried.  Truth is, most Americans don't really care about this issue.

It just good to point out the Dems hypocrisy, and to see Harry Reid choke on his own lie about Romney not paying taxes.

Tax records: Romney donated 29 percent of income to charity in 2011
Published: 4:19 PM 09/21/2012 By Neil Munro

Mitt Romney has donated nearly 13.5 percent of his income to charity over the last 20 years, according to a statement from his accountants at PricewaterhouseCoopers.

Those charitable gifts reached 29 percent of his income in 2011 when he donated $4 million out of his $13.7 million income, according to a Sept. 21 statement describing the Romney’s 2011 tax returns.
Continue Reading:
Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama Univision Disaster: Condescension and Lies on Fast & Furious

Posted by Brian
That Barack Obama is arrogant is not new.  His chin tilted up as he talks looks out over his audience is a common photo of the man. But his performance on Univision yesterday should be required viewing, not just for the Latino community, but for everybody.  Barack Obama unmasks himself for the intolerable boor that he is.  Not accustomed to the kid-glove treatment that he gets from the U.S. mainstream media, Obama is unable to hide his contempt for some truly probing questions from the Univision interviewers.
When asked about his failure to live up to his 2008 campaign promise of passing comprehensive immigration reform, Obama condescendingly explains to the audience how our government works, that it has three branches of government, and that he as President is not all-powerful, and cannot do things alone, saying "we have to have cooperation from all these sources to get thing done".
Of course he fails to mention that in his first two years in office the Democrats controlled the Executive Branch, held a large majority in the House of Representatives, and had a "super majority" in the Senate.   Even as he tries to blame the Republicans for his broken promise on Immigration Reform, it is well known that the GOP had no way of stopping any legislation without Democrats voting against their own President.  Not only was his tone condescending, but his answer was misleading.

H/T to Breitbart for the video

Another tough question for the President (not something Obama is used to, since he rarely takes any questions from the media), was on the Fast & Furious scandal. Asked why Eric Holder didn't know about the program, and why he shouldn't he be fired, Obama responded with this:

"First of all, I think it's important for us to understand that the Fast & Furious program was a field initiated program begun under the previous Administration. When Eric Holder found out about it, he discontinued it."

This entire statement is an out right lie. Fast and Furious did NOT start under the Bush Administration! The Bush administration had a similar program called "Operation Wide Receiver", which was conducted with the cooperation of the Mexican government.  It involved 300 guns which had tracking devices installed on them, and the program was shut down in 2007, nearly two years before Obama was sworn in a President.
The Fast and Furious program was installed after Obama took office. In addition, the Mexican government was not informed of this operation, which involved 3000 weapons, none of which had tracking devices installed to monitor their whereabouts, or who they were going to.  Two U.S. agents were murdered with some of these weapons, as were hundreds of Mexican citizens.
As infuriating as the fact that Obama and his Administration continue to lie to the American public about this flawed-from-the-start program, the bigger question is: Why?  What are they hiding, and who are they trying to protect?  Why does Barack Obama claim "Executive Privilege" regarding the documents if he had no involvement in this? These are all questions that have yet to be answered.
Overall the Univision appearance was an unmitigated disaster for "the One", as he came off as arrogant and dismissive of his audience, and he got caught in a bold faced lie that he and his administration continue to advance.
Well done, Univision!  Thank you for asking some of the questions that our Obama sycophantic U.S. media fail to ask.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Black Caucus' Cleaver: Blacks Who Don't Vote Should Have African-Amer Card Revoked!

Posted by Brian

Emanuel Cleaver, Chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus told a voting rights forum audience that blacks who don't vote should "give us their color back".

Mr. Cleaver, what are blacks supposed to do when "the One" who was supposed to be "leveling the playing field" and redistributing "Obama money" to "his people" turns out not to be the great savior the you, and he, promised?

The bottom line Mr. Cleaver, is that not only has Barack Obama failed to turn around the economy, unemployment, and every other thing that he promised to deliver, but blacks have done even worse under his Presidency than the general population.  He has not only failed to help the black community, but blacks have lost ground economically.

It is you Mr. Cleaver, as well as most other members of the CBC and Democrat Party who have disenfranchised blacks in this country.  You say that blacks must behave and think monolithically, or they are not "authentically" black.  You are not talking just about blacks who don't vote - you speak of blacks who don't vote Democrat!  Independent thinking is not allowed .  For you, conservative blacks are "Uncle Tom's", or worse.

But for those blacks who have decided that they cannot in good conscience vote for Barack Obama, or a modern-day "Demokrat", you now denigrate them, and they too are not "authentic". "You're either all-in on the plantation, or you're an outlier. You, and the liberal establishment have told them that ONLY the Democrat Party is acceptable for blacks and minorities.  Yet under Democrat policies from the Great Society until today, blacks continue to lose ground in income, education, and nearly every benchmark that can be measured.  You entice them with entitlements, free this and free that, but while you put the carrot in front of their nose, you attach a yoke and plowshare to their neck.

You Emanuel Cleaver are not pissed that blacks are not voting.  You are upset that more and more won't vote Democrat!

CBC Chairman on Blacks Who Don’t Vote: ‘They Ought to Give Us Their Color Back’
By Melanie Hunter September 20, 2012

(CNSNews.com) – Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Emanuel Cleaver on Thursday said that African-Americans who don’t vote “ought to give us their color back.”

“That’s why I become so angry at any African-American who refuses to vote. They are not worth the color if they don’t vote. They ought to give us their color back. Their African-American credentials need to be snatched if they don’t vote,” Cleaver said at a CBC forum on voting rights.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta


Iraq War Vet Told To Take Down Flag: It Might "Offend Someone"

Posted by Brian
H/T Fox News

A California apartment manager told an Iraq War veteran to take down his American flag because it might offend someone who doesn't believe in it. Video here
Two things:
For those of you in this country who are offended by the sight of someone flying the American Flag: Either don't look at it, or don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out! Those are your two options. Pick one!

As for the manager who was "unavailable" for comment:  You are a coward! Both for submitting to political correctness, and for not having the guts to go on camera, and explain how you could have the balls to ask a man who served his country in a war, to take down the very symbol of the nation and values he fought for! You disgust me!

Enhanced by Zemanta

NJ Imam: Free Speech A Security Threat To U.S.

Posted by Brian

These people don't miss an opportunity to try to ram sharia, dhimmitude, or jizya down our throats.  Maybe if we had leaders that made it a threat for them to attack our embassies or other interests, this kind of crap wouldn't be an issue.  Something along these lines: "You attacked our embassy and killed four of our citizens? Sense you're feeling a little froggy, we're sending a squadron of Stealth fighters loaded with daisy cutters and bunker busters to calm your asses down, okay? Maybe a few air-burst liquid-fuel bombs. Those ought to take your breath away! Whadaya think!?"

Hey! It worked for Reagan.  Gadaffi calmed down for over 25 years.

Posted on September 20, 2012 at 8:30am byTiffany Gabbay

There are religions that promote turning the other cheek even when mocked, but it appears Islam is not one of them. According to one of the most prominent imams in North America, Islam never condones violence, but it also, under no uncertain terms, “ever accepts” speaking ill of the Prophet Muhammad. 

In fact, so grave is mockery of the prophet considered, that the cleric – Mohammad Qatanani, who leads one of the largest mosques in New Jersey – even believes free speech that criticizes Islam poses a national security threat to the U.S. and that those responsible should be investigated by the Department of Homeland Security.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

Violence In Muslim World Sparked By Obama, Not Film

Posted by Brian

Islamist Salifi's in Jordan
With violence erupting throughout the Muslim world, all of it aimed at the U.S. there has been a lot of talk about the movie that supposedly ignited it. I have a different view.

The movie, "Innocence of Muslims", was virtually unknown outside of as few as the ten people who went to the screening of it, and the unfortunate few who stumbled across it on YouTube. Even the still shots look cartoonish and amateurish (below).

So, if so few people had actually seen this apparent dog of a movie, how is it that it was responsible for the embassy attacks in Egypt and Libya?  Certainly, if a "news" organization like Al Jazeera had picked up on it and broadcast the trailer, the entire Muslim world would have spontaneously erupted into the type of violence that we are seeing now.

The reason is that the movie never was the reason for the attacks on the U.S. embassies on September 11th!  These were coordinated attacks. Planned on the anniversary of the greatest terrorist attack on the U.S. and the West in history.  Libyan officials have said that the attacks were planned.  There are reports that US officials had up to three days notice possible attacks.  Yet, our Ambassador, Christopher Stevens, who was murdered along with three others, had virtually no security.  I believe it will be found that he did not die of "smoke inhalation", as reported, but was beaten to death, and that Libyans were not taking him to the hospital to save his life, but were parading him in the streets, doing a victory dance.

There are still many unanswered questions regarding this disaster, but one thing is clear.  The spontaneous uprising occurred AFTER the White House blamed this movie for the attacks, not before.

It is true that the attacks most certainly emboldened jihadists around the world,  but the street violence was sparked by an Administration which, in an attempt to cover their own intelligence failures and incompetence, set off an Islamic firestorm by blaming a virtually unseen third or fourth-rate movie.

Not only have American's died in the initial attacks, they have now put US Embassies all over the world in danger, along with the people in them.  In addition, there are Muslims dying in these protests.  The actors in the film are getting death threats. Meanwhile, Obama keeps to his schedule of fundraisers, does an interview with the entertainment magazine 'People En Espanol' on the same day the embassy workers bodies were flown in to Andrews AFB, and goes on Letterman to yuck it up, saying he "expects the Muslim world to work with us to keep our people safe".

And we wonder why the rest of the world looks at the US as weak? Any other President would have been convening his security and intelligence teams to find our who did this, ready to kick ass and take names!  But this President apologizes, hosts known terrorists at the White House (Hani Nour Eldin), hosts Iftar dinners, throws allies under the bus (Mubarak), disrespects Heads of State (Netanyahu), and sucks up to our enemies.

Whether through sheer incompetence, mistakes, naivete', or all three, this President and his Administration have blood on their hands, and have managed in a mere three-and-a-half years to make not only the US, but the rest of the world a much more dangerous place.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama Admin Airs Apology Video In Pakistan

Posted by Brian
Why don't they just have a good old-time Bible burning in Islamabad to suck up to these savages?

Pakistani TV shows US ads condemning anti-Islam film

Pakistani TV channels are airing an advert showing news clips of US President Barack Obama condemning an anti-Islam film made in the US.

The advert also features a statement from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at a press conference rejecting the amateur film's message.
Unrest over the film, Innocence of Muslims, has claimed several lives.
Also on Thursday, a protest against the film outside the US embassy which had turned violent ended peacefully.
The adverts seek to emphasise the message reiterated by US officials throughout the crisis: that the "disgusting" film was not made by the US government, but that there is never any justification for violence.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Cult Of Personality - I Pledge Allegiance To Obama

Posted by Brian

"I Pledge Allegiance..."

The Drudge Report has two links today which should, to people paying attention, alarm the hell out of them.

The first one is a link to an Obama 2012 link which is selling an Obama flag in which the stars from the U.S. flag are replaced by the Obama logo.  This follows the outrage a few months ago when it was discovered that a Democrat headquarters was flying an "Obama flag" outside it's building, the only difference being that the blue field was a picture of Obama instead of the logo.  This is not tone deafness.  This is straight out of Obama's "get in their faces!" comment from 2008.

The second piece is a story in the Washington Examiner in which several Hollywood stars are urging people to "pledge allegiance to Barack Obama" by taking "pictures of themselves with their hands on their hearts and a note explaining why they support President Obama"(Not unlike a video from 2009 where stars urged the same thing). The story reports that Obama staffers are also part of this Obama reelection ad campaign.

That these useful idiots (Jessica Alba, Scarlet Johansson, and Natalie Portman) are lending themselves to this campaign is not chilling, or even surprising.  Hollywood elites are well-known for their liberal
causes.  The chilling thing is that this comes from the official Obama
campaign.  The chilling thing is that this man, Obama, is so arrogant, so power-hungry, that he would
not, cannot see the historical danger in people that would put their faith and trust into a single person as the answer to all of their and the nation's problems!

History is rife with the consequences of people and nations who buy into the cult of personality of a single person.   Hitler. Franco. Mussolini. Mao, Stalin. Peron, Pol Pot. Castro. Mugabe. Amin. The list goes on and on. Millions murdered. Millions more thrust into poverty and despair. People afraid to speak out due to the loss of basic freedoms like free-speech, and freedom to worship a God of their own choosing. And yet, we have these vacuous starlets encouraging people to "pledge allegiance" to an individual, when we have reams of history which tell us how dangerous this is.

The incident this past week of a filmmaker dragged out of his house at 1:00AM, because he allegedly "insulted" Islamists halfway around the world with a third-rate, poorly-produced video, should outrage everyone.  Yet, the so-called "defenders of freedom", the media, are not outraged. In fact, many supported the arrest and questioning of this filmmaker. At least the ones who weren't completely silent on the whole thing.

We have, in President Obama, a man who would have you believe that he has all the answers.  That he is the sole arbiter of of the issues that face this country.  Many will say, "but he has to go through Congress", or that "the Supreme Court will keep him from doing anything unconstitutional". Really.  Obama's Presidency is already littered with numerous examples of him unilaterally bypassing Congress with Executive Order after Executive Order.  His EPA is handing down regulations on a nearly daily basis which is destroying the energy industry in the country.  He has ignored the orders of a Federal judge not once, but twice(!), in regards to oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

Freedom of Speech?
Filmmaker taken in for questioning for making movie "insulting" to Muslims
As for the Supreme Court: Who can count on them after Chief Justice John Roberts handed down one of the worst, if not the worst, decision in Supreme Court history, with the ruling on ObamaCare.  A case in which the government lied through their teeth to the nine justices.  A case in which one of the justices, Elena Kagan, was directly involved in the crafting of ObamaCare while in the Obama Administration, and didn't even consider recusing herself from the case.  A case in which one of the justices repeatedly corrected the attorney for the Obama Administration, who kept calling the penalty a tax, by calling it a fee.  This, after Obama repeatedly told the American people that it was not a tax. Yet,  his attorney kept calling it a tax.  Finally, Justice Roberts sided with the four leftist justices to find that ObamaCare was Constitutional because he said it was a tax.  So, for the first time in our nation's history, the people of the United States are being compelled to buy a service, whether they want it or not.  Do you still have faith in the ability of a Supreme Court holding Barack Obama in check if he is elected to a second term?

Keep in mind, that whoever is the next President is going to be nominating two, if not three, new Supreme Court Justices.  If the next President is Barack Obama, his Supreme Court picks would pitch the court so far to the left that it would take decades to correct.  The damage that would be done to our country would be immeasurable. Our nation would be changed as to be unrecognizable, not only to the Founders, but even to us.

Ronald Reagan once said:
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

Our country is at a crossroads. We are on the precipice of falling into despotism. We are currently a post-constitutional society, with an out-of control government, governed by an elitist political class who are more concerned with maintaining their power than governing according to the ideals that this country was founded upon.  The Constitution is an annoyance to them. An obstacle to chasing the utopian fantasies common to all other dictators and despots that have tried, and failed, before them to engineer the "perfect" society.

It is not too late to turn the Great Ship around, though we fight an uphill battle against an administration, the media, and a legion of sycophants willing to "pledge" themselves to a man who despises the values and ideals that this country was founded on, and which has allowed it to be the "the last best hope of for a mankind plagued by tyranny and deprivation".

Election day is less than two months away.  Let us not be that generation who has to explain to our children and grandchildren of what a great country the United States used to be.

Enhanced by Zemanta


Despite Media Love Fest, Obama DNC Bounce Evaporates

Posted by Brian
With a 6-point convention bounce for Obama, Democrats and the media were calling the election over What started as a thrill up their collective legs has now turned into a trickle down the crack of their ass. Romney is surging and polls show him ahead in key battleground states.

Even as the media brazenly advocates for an Obama second term, the American people aren't buying it. The people bought into Obama's promise of "Hope & Change" in 2008.  In 2012, we just want a change in leadership.

by MIKE FLYNN  18 Sep 2012

This afternoon, Gallup reported its latest presidential tracking poll, finding Obama's lead had slipped again. Today, he leads Romney, among registered voters, by 1 point, 47-46. This is the same level of support he had before the Democrat convention. More importantly though, it represents a 6-point swing in Obama's support in one week. Last week he led by 7 points. Clearly, the media will tell us this is trouble for Romney.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

Illegal? Obama Gives Wink And Nod To Donating To Super Pac's At Jay-Z Fundraiser

Posted by Brian

Obama proves time and again that laws and the Constitution are not something he respects, but obstacles he is willing to go up, over, and around to maintain his power.
Taken as a whole, his willingness to use his position to behave criminally on so many fronts would have had the media and Democrats screaming for Articles of Impeachment if it had been a Republican.

Instead, we get silence.

by JOHN NOLTE  19 Sep 2012, 11:30 AM PDT

If our corrupt media believe a Republican said something inappropriate at a fundraiser about the 47% of the American people the rest of us carry, the corrupt media attempt to destroy his campaign over it.

However, if a sitting president appears to openly and brazenly break the laws surrounding the solicitation of super PAC money, this very same media dutifully report but refuse to talk about it:
Continue Reading Here
Enhanced by Zemanta



Posted by Brian
H/T Breitbart
Ronald Reagan once gave one of the great speeches in American political history - "A Time For Choosing". (Video of speech, below)  Though it did not move Barry Goldwater into the Oval Office, it laid the foundation for Ronald Reagan's ascension to that Office sixteen years later. It is time for choosing again.
A small number of Ron Paul fans still cling to the idea that he or Gary Johnson still have a legitimate shot at winning the White House in November.  This is not only unrealistic, it's delusional.  At this time there are only two realistic choices - Mitt Romney or Barack Obama.
As Kurt Schlichter makes clear in his article below, this is no time to play around with some morally superior notion that you won't compromise your ideological purity to vote for someone like Mitt Romney.  In other elections, like 1992 and 1996, though I disagreed with Ross Perot, I understood to a degree the need for people to lodge a "protest vote" for Perot.  In both cases, particularly 1992 (Perot won 18.9% of the vote), those "protests" ensured the election of Bill Clinton.  Clinton remains the only candidate to win both election and reelection to President with less than 50% of the vote in either election.  The difference this time is that, though I didn't and still don't support Bill Clinton, he was no Marxist ideologue.  Barack Obama is. The stakes this election are greater that they've ever been in my lifetime.  Another 4 years of Barack Obama will ensure that the future United States will no longer resemble the republic that has been a beacon of hope and freedom for over 225 years.
Ron Paul supporters, the choice is: An imperfect Mitt Romney, or a Barack Obama who stands for everything you hate. Make a choice


by KURT SCHLICHTER  18 Sep 2012, 11:14 AM
There is no more time for games, no room for hurt feelings. Ron Paul fans, you need to choose, because not voting for Romney is a vote for Obama. It’s that simple. And you could make the difference.
Maybe Romney isn’t the uncompromising Ayn Rand hero you’d design if you could build your ideal candidate from scratch, but he’s a lot better than the guy on whose watch this happened:

Continue Reading Here

Ronald Reagan - "A Time For Choosing"

Enhanced by Zemanta

IRONY: Pakistani Protestor Dies By Smoke From Burning U.S. Flag

Posted by Brian

America basher’s backfire: Killed by flag smoke 
By ANDY SOLTIS Post Wire Services
Last Updated: 4:51 AM, September 18, 2012 Posted: 12:31 AM, September 18, 2012

In an apparent case of red, white and blue revenge, a Pakistani protester died yesterday after inhaling smoke from a burning American flag during an anti-US rally.
Read More Here

OBAMA VIDEO FROM 1998: "I Actually Believe In Redistribution"


At an October 19, 1998 conference at Loyola University, Barack Obama spoke against "propaganda" that said government doesn't work and the need to "pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution."


Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

WH Press In Blackout On Sebelius' Breaking Law

Posted by Brian
The "free press" can no longer be addressed as such.  They don't even hide the fact that they are bought and paid for by the Democrat Party and other leftist organizations and individuals.  The zeal with which they go after conservatives and Republicans for even minor infractions, or "perceived" wrongdoing, is non-existent when the violator is a liberal Democrat.
Democrat William Jefferson was caught in a money laundering scam, and though charged and convicted, the story was barely addressed by the media.  Minnesota lawmaker Kerry Gauthier was caught have sex at a rest stop with a 17 year-old boy (read: statutory rape), and the news cycle on it was barely 24 hours. His punishment? He dropped out of his race for reelection. Yet, Republican Larry Craig "taps his foot" under a bathroom stall at an airport, allegedly attempting to solicit sex, and it's 24/7 coverage for days, until he is forced to resign.
Enter Kathleen Sebelius, who is caught using her position to campaign for Barack Obama, a violation of Federal law, and the press is uninterested.  Taken by itself, this may seem a minor matter. Much ado about nothing.  But taken with all of the other scandals with the Obama White House, like the killings in Libya, the "Fast and Furious" gun scandal, the leaking of Top Secret information from the White House, Solyndra, LightSquared, and God knows what else.  The media doesn't care!  It's get Obama reelected at any and all costs!
Sean Hannity declared in 2008 that the "media died".  I disagree.  They didn't die.  They are alive and well, operating as a Soviet-style state-run media, parroting White House propaganda to the masses like good little communists.

Reporters haven’t asked about Sebelius breaking law in W.H. briefings

Reporters covering the White House don’t seem to have many questions about Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who was last week found in violation of federal law against engaging in political activity while on the job.
A review of transcripts by The Daily Caller indicate that no questions have been asked by the reporters who cover the president about Sebelius during official White House briefings or gaggles since Sept. 12, when the U.S. Office of Special Counsel said in a report that the cabinet secretary violated the Hatch Act earlier this year.
Continue Reading Here
Enhanced by Zemanta

Media Hack Soledad O'Brien: Romney "Doesn't Worry About 47% Of The Country"

Posted by Brian

Soledad O'Brien is quickly becoming one of the biggest hacks in journalism. My guess is that she is able to get by with it because she is easy on the eyes.  But it doesn't make it easy to watch her. Behind her smile is a condescending, elitist air. She is also thin-skinned and hostile to those with whom she disagrees. In her mind, she is the smartest, most prepared person in the room, her stack of "facts" from Wikipedia and Google laid out before her.

Soledad O'Brien makes no attempt to hide her disinterest in Bay Buchanan's answer.
In an infamous confrontation with Breitbart's Joel Pollack over Obama's relationship to Harvard Professor Derrick Bell and critical race theory, O'Brien was at her most acidic.  O'Brien asked Pollack to define critical race theory, which he did, and then accused Pollack of not knowing what he was talking about. She then gave her own definition.  The problem is that Pollack was correct, and O'Brien was wrong. As in other interviews with those whom she disagrees, she comes off as very full of herself, and of her moral and intellectual superiority.  The interview descended into O'Brien and her guest accusing Pollack of racism. The typical liberal tactic when you're getting your ass handed to you in a debate.

This brings us to O'Brien's latest hack interview with Bay Buchanan over comments Mitt Romney made at a fundraiser.  She starts out, not by quoting Romney, but by giving her "summary" of Romney's statement in the most negative light she can,  Saying he doesn't "worry about 47% of the country," complete with snarled lips and facial expressions disgust. She does nothing to hide her bias, and is unwilling to even consider Bay Buchanan's logic: that Romney was speaking politically as to his ability to reach those 47% of voters, and get them to vote for him. Therefore, he needs to focus his message to the other 53%, especially the independent voters, in order to win the election.  Of course, O'Brien's message is that Romney doesn't care at all for those 47% , and wishes they would just die.

You see, that's how all conservatives think according to O'Brien and her ilk.  Yet she is totally unconcerned for the 47% of Americans that are dependent on government, or that the number continues to grow at an alarming rate, precisely because of liberal social policies and entitlement programs. It is the soft bigotry of low expectations, as stated by George W. Bush.


“There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what. All right, there are 47 percent who are with him, who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it.” 
“That, that’s an entitlement. And the government should give it to them. And they will vote for this president no matter what…These are people who pay no income tax,” he continued, adding “so our message of low taxes doesn’t connect.”  
“[M]y job is, is not to worry about those people. I’ll never convince them they should take personal responsibility and care for their lives.”

Enhanced by Zemanta


DNC Video: "The Government Is The Only Thing We All Belong To"

“Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.” - C.S. Lewis

If you want to know exactly what is wrong with the modern Democrat Party, they have managed to sum it up in a single line.  Their "the government is the only thing that we all belong to" line in a DNC video exposes how deep the ideological divide is of the Democrats Party from the ideas and beliefs of the Founding Fathers.
We do not belong to the "belong" to this, or any other government.  This is the lie of the statist.  Our Constitution is very clear that the government belongs, and works for us.  Not the other way around!  These lifelong politicians in Washington have not only forgotten that, but they have set themselves up as a privileged class, who see themselves as lording over us.  We as citizens of this great country, need to rise up and send them a message, not only this November, but in every election. One that is loud and clear. For those incumbents who are no longer governing according to the Constitution, each cycle should be the opportunity to send them back to private life.  In government it truly should be the old axiom, "what have you done for me today?".  If you forget that, you're gone. Period!
Remember: They work for us!


Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta