Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts

8/15/2013

The Liberty Amendments Interview: Mark Levin on Returning States' Rights, the Peoples' Rights, a Return to Federalism

Posted by Brian
BREITBART NEWS INTERVIEW: MARK LEVIN AND THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS
by JOEL B. POLLAK  12 Aug 2013


Breitbart News: With The Liberty Amendments, you're attempting to launch a movement to amend the Constitution. Do you expect to be successful, and how long would it take?

Levin: What I hope to do, at least in some small way, is begin a discussion among those of us who believe the Republic is unraveling, and find a way to re-establish the Constitution and reclaim our heritage.  When you look at the massive debt and reckless monetary policies of the federal government; the ability of five Supreme Court justices to pervert the Constitution and impose via fiat their personal policy preferences on the whole of society without any recourse; Congress's legislating, through massive bills, outside its enumerated powers and its delegation of unchecked power to a massive and growing bureaucracy, which legislates thousands of times each year by regulatory fiat; and the increasing authoritarianism of presidents who issue executive orders to create their own law and also blatantly rewrite statutes by interpretation and execution (or not) based on whether they agree with them or not; I think this and much more evinces the growing and steady decline of constitutional republicanism. And I've concluded that Washington is incapable of reforming itself, which should seem fairly obvious. After all, it has designed the federal Leviathan, which is getting bigger and more aggressive.  And I was thinking: What has this federal government become? It is not a constitutional, federal, or representative republic, as our Framers understood those institutions. I believe the federal government is increasingly operating outside the Constitution and that we are in a post-constitutional period. This is how justices, presidents, and members of Congress are able to concoct and then impose such monstrous laws as Obamacare and Dodd-Frank, among thousands of other laws and rules every year, on an unwitting population. This book is written for those of us who fear what is happening to our nation--the increasing authoritarianism and abuse of the individual--and refuse to accept these events either by pretending they are not serious or as the inevitable decline of a great republic. This has been building for decades, since at least the advent of the Progressive era, and, in my view, requires a resolute, decades'-long effort to reverse course. So, the question arises, what do we do? For those of us who care, my book explores some of the possibilities. And they are provided in the Constitution itself. The Framers knew better than others what it was like to confront actual tyranny. So why wouldn't we look to these greatest men for answers? So, that's what I did. If you look at Article V of the Constitution, it includes, among other things, two processes for amending the Constitution. The first process has resulted in twenty-seven amendments: two-thirds of both Houses of Congress propose an amendment, and three-fourths of the states are required to ratify it. In the second process, which is every bit as legitimate, two-thirds of the states decide to convene a meeting for the purpose of proposing amendments, which are then sent to the states for three-fourths ratification. It is a process that essentially bypasses Congress.  Let me be as clear as I can: this second amendment process provides for a convention of the states to propose amendments, which in turn must be ratified by three-fourths of the states; it does not provide for a Constitutional Convention. Furthermore, because three-fourths of the states must ratify proposed amendments, there would be no "runaway convention" overturning the entire Constitution, as some might fear monger. I fully expect the most vociferous critics of this constitutional process to be among those who support or have contributed to all manner of constitutional evasions and distortions in favor of the increasing centralization and concentration of power, which is precisely what the Constitution was established to prevent. Now, this is something I want to discuss at length on my program, and which I discuss at length in the book.  I believe our strongest weapon is the Constitution, and therefore we should do all we can to reacquaint the American people with their Constitution. This is how we push back against a mindset that insists they surrender so much of their liberty to federal institutions; it is a mindset pounded home each and everyday by self-serving politicians, in academia, by the media, et cetera. Alexis de Tocqueville, and many others, eloquently warned about democracies acquiescing to the gradualism of soft tyranny and its destructiveness on man's nature. The amendment process of which I speak was proposed and enacted by the Framers, who considered it crucial to accomplishing the ratification of the Constitution, for it was specifically established to address the possibility of an oppressive federal government. In particular, George Mason insisted two days before the Constitutional Convention's end that there needed to be a lawful and civil way to address an oppressive federal government, which he believed inevitable, short of violence and revolution. The Convention delegates in Philadelphia agreed. Thus, the Constitution provides that at least two-thirds of the states could ultimately get together, essentially bypassing Congress, and propose amendments to the Constitution which, in turn, all the states would then consider, three-fourths of which would be required to ratify them. This is no easy task. But it is the path the Framers provided in the Constitution to lawfully and civilly address an increasingly oppressive federal government, which ultimately would not control itself. So, we turn to the Constitution to save the Constitution, and restore the Republic. As I write in the book, I admit that this is something that, originally, I was skeptical about. But having now thoroughly studied the intent of the Framers in this regard, it is crystal clear they put this process in place to provide us recourse under the kind of circumstances we find ourselves confronted with today. I need to underscore that this is not some radical or novel idea, although it has been largely ignored. It will be ferociously opposed by the proponents or beneficiaries of an all powerful federal government, or dismissed by those who delude themselves that nothing of this sort can happen in America and, as they will undoubtedly claim, Americans are resilient and we have overcome worse. But it is those who seek to further impose this alien design on our society who are the target of this amendment process. Their objections, albeit self-serving, are understandable. As for the others, let me say it is because Americans are resilient that I believe we are not destined for all eternity to suffer a miserable existence, which is precisely why we must take matters into our own hands by embracing the Constitution. It was President Reagan who famously stated: "You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children's children say of us that we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done." The book is called The Liberty Amendments for a reason. I have proposed eleven amendments for people to think about, not because I am all-knowing and all-powerful, but because they are my suggestions to encourage people to think about or, even better, to become active in reclaiming their heritage through this state convention process. The amendments I propose are not abstractions, but concrete suggestions, based precisely on what I believe, through research and scholarship, the Framers intended for this republic. I discuss each amendment at length in the book, and it is impossible to do them justice in a short interview. But it is worth remembering, whereas the statists promise a utopian paradise that conflicts with our constitutional order as justification for an ever-growing federal government, and many Republicans embrace the status quo, as designed by the statists-- I call them neo-statists--I say let's enthusiastically embrace the Constitution rather than fear it. Let's be positive about it. It offers us liberty, opportunity, security. These amendments are all aimed at reclaiming our founding principles by unraveling the federal Leviathan and reducing the excessive and growing power of the ruling class. Do I think this is doable, and how quickly? Absolutely, or I wouldn't have written the book.The Framers thought so, because otherwise they wouldn't have bothered including this process in the Constitution. Will it happen tomorrow? Absolutely not. But I dare say that at some point it will. Because the situation in this country will reach a point, with lost liberties and economic dislocation, that I believe the people will look for a legitimate and non-violent means by which to save themselves. The nation's demise is not inevitable, unless we do nothing. We can prevent this, if we, the people, have the desire and motivation to do so. People want to know how we can do it. And the only way I can think of--I'm open to others--is by turning to the Constitution and the recourse the Framers left us. One other point. Look at the statists. They play for keeps, and they are resolute. They never surrender, and they are never done with their social engineering and societal experiments. For example, for a century they have pushed national health care. They finally achieved it with Obamacare. Yet, Obamacare is just a start. It is a platform from which they intend to pursue endless lifestyle calibrations. The individual will be tormented and coerced endlessly. We conservatives, on the other hand, get impatient. We are too quick to abandon the battlefield. We must be as resolute, as defiant, as ambitious for liberty and constitutionalism as the statist is for the opposite. As I said earlier, there is an American spirit, and we must rekindle it and spread it. We need not accept this, we must not. We have children and grandchildren to think about; we must think about future generations, and not just the next two or three. We must encourage people to engage in the Constitution in the way that our Founders intended.
Continue Reading at Breitbart News' Big Government
Enhanced by Zemanta

2/18/2013

In NY, having 8 rounds in a magazine is worse than LURING A CHILD or RAPE

Posted by Tom

New York recently passed the most draconian gun laws in the Nation.  Here's a list of Crimes per New York Statute that are LESSER crimes than having 8 ROUNDS IN A MAGAZINE, which is a CLASS D FELONY......

120.70 - Luring a child | E Felony
121.11 - Criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation | A Misdemeanor
125.10 - C
riminally negligent homicide | E Felony
130.20 - Sexual misconduct | A Misdemeanor
130.25 - Rape 3rd degree | E Felony
130.40 - Criminal sexual act 3rd degree | E Felony
130.52 - Forcible touching | A Misdemeanor
130.53 - Persistent sexual abuse | E Felony (repeat child molester, must be caught and convicted in two separate cases before the charges even reach this level)
130.65A - Aggravated sexual abuse 4th degree | E Felony
130.85 - Female genital mutilation | E Felony

 220.28 - Use of a child to commit a controlled substance offense | E Felony
255.25 - Incest 3rd degree | E Felony
263.11 - Possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child | E Felony

263.16 - Possessing a sexual performance by a child | E Felony 
 and....
135.05 - Unlawful imprisonment 2nd degree | A Misdemeanor
135.10 - Unlawful imprisonment 1st degree | E Felony
135.45 - Custodial interference 2nd degree | A Misdemeanor
135.50 - Custodial interference 1st degree | E Felony
135.55 - Substitution of children | E Felony (switched at birth type of thing)
135.60 - Coercion 2nd degree | A Misdemeanor
150.01 - 5th degree Arson | A Misdemeanor
150.05 - 4th degree Arson | E Felony
178.10 - 4th degree Criminal diversion of prescription medications and prescriptions | A Misdemeanor
178.15 - 3rd degree Criminal diversion of prescription medications and prescriptions | E Felony
240.05 - Riot 2nd degree | A Misdemeanor
240.06 - Riot 1st degree | E Felony
240.08 - Inciting to riot | A Misdemeanor
240.10 - Unlawful assembly | B Misdemeanor
240.15 - Criminal anarchy | E Felony
240.20 - Disorderly conduct | Violation
240.61 - Placing a false bomb or hazardous substance 2nd degree | E Felony
250.45 - Unlawful surveillance 2nd degree | E felony (Hidden cams for sexual gratification)



Keep in mind.....POLITICIANS write the laws where THEY KEEP THEIRS and YOU DON'T!

Calls on Police to Inspect the Homes of ‘Assault Weapon’ Owners

Posted by Tom

Don't worry, they're not coming to take your guns, they're only going to "inspect your home," if you own an assault rifle in Washington State.

It's time for EVERYONE TO WAKE UP and realize what's going on around them!  More and more bills are being proposed to ban rifles, magazines, "universal background checks," which is really universal gun registration, and even gun confiscation!


The CRIMINAL actions of SOME, should not dictate that Constitutional Rights of Everyone!

‘Orwellian’: Proposed Gun Law in Washington State Calls on Police to Inspect the Homes of ‘Assault Weapon’ Owners

2/15/2013

Gun Violence Problem or? What Works!

Posted by Tom

Politicians and and far too many members of the media would have us believe that controlling, regulating or even confiscating guns is the answer to preventing gun violence.  Until the Federal and State Governments go after the Gangs and Criminals with the same fervor they did with organized crime, this problem is guaranteed to continue! 

I can tell you unequivocally what will make a significant impact not only on gun violence, but many other crimes as well.  This includes Robbery, Burglary, Aggravated Assault, Rape, Car Jacking, Home Invasions, Drug Dealing, etc.  Rarely does a person go from having a clean criminal record to becoming a murderer!  Almost all start with lesser crimes, many involving guns, until they finally "graduate" to taking a human life.  Far too many of these same offenders are later released to repeat the process all over again!

By having a Criminal Justice System with a revolving door, we allow these repeat offenders to continue to victimize the innocent.  It's hard to commit crimes when you're locked in prison!  Many Politicians want to say we have a "gun problem" when in reality, what we have is a Judicial, Criminal Control problem!  Here are REAL solutions that will dramatically effect not only violent crimes, but ALL crime:

1.  STRONG MANDATORY SENTENCES for anyone using a gun in the commission of a crime.  If you're caught with a gun while committing a crime, you should be sentenced to an AUTOMATIC 20 Years in Federal Prison, PLUS the time for whatever your crime was.  Example:  If you are convicted of dealing drugs and are in possession of a gun, you get 5 years for dealing drugs AND 20 Years for having a gun during the commission of a crime and end up with a 25 year sentence.  No parole, no good time, no concurrent sentencing.  If you're convicted of Murder, you might get 30 years for Murder AND 20 Years for using a gun.  With a 50 year or more sentence, and no chance of parole, they've effectively ended their lives in prison!  Even the dumbest of Criminals will realize the cost is simply too great to use a gun!

2.  CONVICTED FELONS and MENTALLY DEFECTIVE:  If you're a convicted Felon or a person adjudicated mentally defective and you're caught with a gun, even if you've committed no other crime, you should get an automatic 10 years in Federal Prison or a secure Mental Institution.  No parole, no good time, etc.  How many then will think before they hit the streets carrying an illegal gun?

3.  FEDERALLY MANDATED MENTAL HEALTH REPORTING:  There needs to be a Federal law that requires the mandatory reporting of those adjudicated mentally defective to the NICS background check system.  Currently only 27 States report to this system!  Still others don't even use the Federal NICS system, but instead use their own State run system.  That means 23 States are NOT reporting the Mentally defective!  This is why nut jobs slip through the cracks!

4.  DISQUALIFYING GUN OWNERSHIP CONVICTIONS:  If you're a gun owner and are convicted of a  Felony or other disqualifying offense, you sign a legal document acknowledging that you are required to turn in your firearms to be sold at auction and the proceeds used to make restitution for your crime.  Also, if you're found with a gun at ANY time in the future, you get an automatic 20 Years.  How many would then choose to risk 20 years by retaining or using a firearm?

5.   COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN:  Historically, this Country has had a huge problem with drinking and driving.  Our Nation launched a focused campaign to educate people on the dangers of drunk driving, how to be responsible and got tough on those convicted of drunk driving.  As a result of that campaign, drinking and driving has been cut in half!  This same approach needs to be made when it comes to firearms training, safe storage responsibility and to educate youths on their future opportunities and the consequences of actions that include criminal behavior. 

6.  COMMUNITY RESOURCES:  In an era where our youth worship sports figures and music stars, we need to establish mentoring problems to help at risk youth realize the unlimited potential of education and hard work!  At the same time, these same Mentors can emphasize the importance of good decision making and conflict resolution, instead of destroying lives through violence.

CRIMINALS SHOULD NOT DETERMINE THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF LAW ABIDING CITIZENS.   Only by holding CRIMINALS responsible for their actions and educating people do we solve this problem!  Do the American People simply want Politicians to "do something," that has little to no chance of actually reducing violence, or do they want these same Politicians to DEMAND we hold Criminals responsible for their actions and actually reduce ALL crime, especially gun violence?  Only by adopting these laws will we make a REAL reduction in gun violence, ensure the Constitutional Rights of law abiding Citizens, while at the same time protecting them from being victimized by Criminals!

I agree with President Obama on one point.  The Victims of Gun Violence DESERVE to have meaningful laws passed that will actually protect us all by deterring Criminals and taking them off the street.  The answer is NOT to make Criminals of law abiding gun owners.

Imagine this....
If mandatory minimum sentences are passed for gun violations, the prison population would swell, but Dart says there is no place for the swell of inmates to go.




Chicago's mayor and police chief are now saying they want want mandatory minimum sentences for people who commit gun violations, while at the same time say they can't afford it.  This past week, Mayor Rahm Emanuel called for even tougher gun laws, CBS News reports, and Police Superintendent Gary McCarthy says “gun offenders have to do significant jail time.”

“We can't have this irrational type of notion that there's magic jail cells all over the place that are all sitting there empty, " said Dart. "It's as if all of a sudden we just raise penalties and these people get shipped off to the moon or something.”  READ THE FULL STORY HERE


So what do we take from all of this?  It's easier and cheaper to infringe upon the Constitutionally protected rights of law abiding Citizens than it is to hold Criminals accountable!

2/01/2013

Incredibly powerful video...The Last Line of Defense

Posted by Tom

I normally wouldn't post a short video clip, but I found this incredibly powerful...


Who is Sheriff Mack?...

Author/speaker and former sheriff Richard Mack has served in a wide variety of roles over the course of his nearly twenty year career in law enforcement, which began in Provo, Utah. Mack began his career with the Provo Police Department as a parking enforcement cadet while attending BYU. A couple of years later he became a full-time officer and was soon promoted to Corporal, Sergeant, and Detective. His most traumatic experience there was a one-year assignment as an undercover narcotics agent. After nearly 11 years at Provo PD, Mack decided to return to his childhood turf in Arizona and run for Graham County Sheriff. His campaign took off and he was elected in 1988. He was sheriff for two terms until 1997. He was named Elected Official of the Year by the Arizona-New Mexico Coalition of Counties in 1994, received the NRA Law Officer of the Year, inducted into the NRA Hall of Fame, 1995 Cicero Award, Samuel Adams Leadership Award from the Local Sovereignty Coalition, and Gun Owners of America Defender of the Second Amendment Award. During his tenure, federal officers informed the sheriffs of the state that they would be required to enforce the so-called "Brady Bill" and run background checks at their expense under the law. In 1994, Mack and six other sheriffs from across the country, challenged the constitutionality of the Brady Bill and ultimately, fought it all the way to the United States Supreme Court, where they won a monumental decision for freedom. Three years later, in a landmark 5-4 split decision based on the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Mack won his case. Mack as an undercover narcotics agent Mack as an undercover narcotics agent A graduate of the FBI National Academy, some of Mack's positions include: patrol officer, undercover narcotics officer, hostage negotiator, youth officer, school resource officer, communications supervisor, corporal, front desk sergeant, detective, sheriff, Search and Rescue supervisor, jail administrator, and DARE instructor. Mack has been a consultant on numerous cases regarding police abuse, brutality, and other misconduct by public officials. He has joined with other members of the law enforcement community to speak out in favor of drug policy reform. A graduate of Brigham Young University, Mack lives with his wife in Fredericksburg, Texas. During the past two years Sheriff Mack has been a speaker at more than 70 different Tea Party rallies all across the country, ranging all the way from Honolulu to Bangor, Maine. Mack has supported this noble movement, because it is both effective and peaceful.

1/29/2013

UPDATED! A VERY DISTURBING PICTURE!

Posted by Tom

I have never been one to believe in conspiracy theories, etc., but I am beginning to see an incredibly disturbing trend developing within this Country.  I'm going point out some facts and situations which individually may mean very little, but collectively should give any Freedom loving American cause for concern.  History is replete with examples of how his this very same model has been used and abused by Governments to create oppressive, totalitarian regimes.

I realize this is a long article, but I think you'll find it filled with information you're probably not aware of.  The sum of which has the potential for GRAVE IMPACT upon the American People.  

Please share this with others, Americans need to WAKE UP! 
Please LIKE and SHARE on FACEBOOK at bottom of page

 

THE PATRIOT ACT:
Originally enacted under the Bush administration in response to 9/11, on May 27, 2011, President Obama, over widespread bipartisan objections, approved a Congressional four year extension of controversial parts of the Patriot Act that were set to expire. In March of 2010, Obama signed a similar extension of the Patriot Act for one year. These provisions allow the government, with permission from a special secret court, to seize records without the owner’s knowledge, conduct secret surveillance of suspicious people who have no known ties to terrorist groups, and to obtain secret roving wiretaps on people.

Wiretaps for oral, electronic or wire communications, approved by federal and state courts, are at an all-time high. Wiretaps in year 2010 were up 34% from 2009, according to the Administrative Office of the US Courts.  There are at least 72 fusion centers across the US which collect local domestic police information and merge it into multi-jurisdictional intelligence centers, according to a recent report by the ACLU. These centers share information from federal, state and local law enforcement and some private companies to secretly spy on Americans. These all continue to grow and flourish under the Obama administration.

In July 2010, the Washington Post released “Top Secret America,” a series of articles detailing the results of a two year investigation into the rapidly expanding world of homeland security, intelligence and counter-terrorism. It found 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence at about 10,000 locations across the US. Every single day, the National Security Agency intercepts and stores more than 1.7 billion emails, phone calls and other types of communications. The FBI has a secret database named Guardian that contains reports of suspicious activities filed from federal, state and local law enforcement. According to the Washington Post Guardian contained 161,948 files as of December 2009. From that database there have been 103 full investigations and at least five arrests the FBI reported. The Obama administration has done nothing to cut back on the secrecy.

The Bay Area Transit System, in August 2011, hearing of rumors to protest against fatal shootings by their police, shut down cell service in four stations. Western companies sell email surveillance software to repressive regimes in China, Libya and Syria to use against protestors and human rights activists. Surveillance cameras monitor residents in high crime areas, street corners and other governmental buildings. Police department computers ask for and receive daily lists from utility companies with the addresses and names of every home address in their area. Computers in police cars scan every license plate of every car they drive by. The Obama administration has made no serious effort to cut back these new technologies of spying on citizens.

The Patriot Act even allows the Government to get records from your local Library, to see what books you're reading.  It also allows for the WARRANTLESS search of your emails more than 150 days old, without justification or oversite.  These concrete examples document a sustained assault on domestic civil liberties in the United States under the Obama administration.
__________________________________________________________________________________

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DATA MINING:
DHS Directive 110-01 specifically identifies information to be gathered from Social Media Sites on U.S. Citizens, amongst others.  This includes, but is not limited to: Name, addresses, relatives, pictures, internet service provider information, account numbers, employment, education and lots more!  In short, nothing is private to the DHS.  DHS Data mining is also certainly not limited to Social Media sites, but from any available databases, including commerial sites specializing in it's collection.  

Data-mining programs at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security are not fully reviewed by the agency for their effectiveness and, in some cases, for their compliance with privacy protection mandates, according to a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. The DHS has not completed privacy impact assessments for two of the six data-mining programs the GAO reviewed, the report said.  In addition, DHS violated its own privacy rules by sharing information from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Pattern Analysis and Information Collection (ICEPIC) program with state and local law enforcement agencies, said Representatives Brad Miller of North Carolina and Donna Edwards of Maryland, both Democratic members of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee.

One of the "most disturbing findings" by the GAO was that ICEPIC rolled out its law enforcement sharing component before it was approved by the DHS privacy office, Miller and Edwards said in a press release. The program violates the DHS privacy impact assessment created for the program, the GAO report said.

_________________________________________________________________________________

NEW NSA DATA CENTER BEING BUILT IN UTAH:

The Utah Data Center is a data storage facility being built for the NSA and is designed to be a primary storage resource capable of storing data on the scale of yottabytes.  It is alleged to capture "all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Internet searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital 'pocket litter'," though its precise purpose is secret.[1] The US Senate has voted to approve the FAA Sunsets Extension Act of 2012, which will authorize warrantless surveillance of Americans for counter-terrorism purposes for another five years. The bill extends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which granted retroactive immunity for wiretaps and email monitoring under the Bush Administration.[3]

>HERE IS A VIDEO THAT GOES MORE INTO THE FACILITY<

_________________________________________________________________________________

STINGRAY DEVICES: 
A federal court judge in Arizona next month will decide if the Department of Justice overstepped the 4thamendment when it used a device called a “stingray” to collect evidence against David Daniel Rigmaiden, a 30-year-old Arizona man accused of leading a massive identity theft ring from 2005 to 2008.  Stingrays look like cell towers but are used to collect cell information (even when the phone is not in use) from everyone within reach of the device. Law enforcement officials say the tool is used in a targeted way to search for terror suspects. the defendant in this case says his fourth amendment rights were violated.  READ HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS..

_________________________________________________________________________________

DHS EMERGENCY POWER EXTENDED, INCLUDING PRIVATE TELECOM SYSTEMS:
The Obama administration has given the Department of Homeland Security powers to prioritize government communications over privately owned telephones and internet systems in "emergencies."  An executive order signed June 6 gives DHS the authority to seize control of telecommunications facilities, including telephone, cellular and wireless networks.

When President Obama inked his name to the Assignment of National Security and Emergency Preparedness Communications Functions Executive Order on July 6, he authorized the US Department of Homeland Security to take control of the country’s wired and wireless communications — including the Internet — in instances of emergency. The signing was accompanied with little to no acknowledgment outside of the White House, but initial reports on the order quickly caused the public to speak out over what some equated to creating an Oval Office kill switch for the Web. Now the Obama administration is addressing those complaints by calling the Executive Order a necessary implement for America’s national security.

Former White House spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden insists that “The [order] does not transfer authorities between or among departments,” but the order does indeed allow the DHS to establish and implement control over even the privately owned communication systems in the country, including Internet Service Providers such as Time Warner, Verizon and Comcast, if the administration agrees that it is warranted for security’s sake. (everything justified by "Safety")

Immediately after last week’s signing, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) said the order allowed the DHS "the authority to seize private facilities when necessary, effectively shutting down or limiting civilian communications." This is essential for any Government taking control of it's Citizens.
  
 

RETURNING WAR VETERANS LABELED AS "DOMESTIC TERRORIST THREAT."
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S.  “This report appears to raise significant issues involving the privacy and civil liberties of many Americans - including war veterans,” said Rep. Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.  The FBI has also characterized returning veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan as a major domestic terrorist threat.  FBI documents show the bureau was working with investigators inside the nation's uniformed services "in an effort to identify those current or former soldiers who pose a domestic terrorism threat." The other agencies working with the FBI are the U.S. Army Criminal Investigative Division, the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service.  Freedom of information Act requests have revealed that the majoirty of  DHS "intelligence" has been provided by none other than the "Southern Poverty Law Center."
 __________________________________________________________________________________


LICENSE PLATE READERS - DESIGNED TO TRACK YOUR MOVEMENTS:
Today, tens of thousands of LPRs are being used by law enforcement agencies all over the country.  The system's unchecked, and largely unmonitored, use raises significant privacy concerns. License plates, dates, times, and locations of all cars seen are kept in law enforcement databases for months or even years at a time. In the worst case, the New York State Police keeps all of its LPR data indefinitely. No universal standard governs how long data can or should be retained.
 
The country's largest such company, Federal Signal Corporation (FSC), which sells LPRs under its PIPS brand name, says it has sold 20,000 mobile systems across North America and another 15,000 fixed devices across the United States and the United Kingdom.  "We work with the 25 largest cities in the United States, over 100 cities in the US.  Tim O'Leary, a company vice president, in an interview with Ars said, "We think the market is growing at 8 to 10 percent, adjusted growth rate, annually."
Various agencies, in particular the Department of Homeland Security, the Drug Enforcement Agency, and Customs and Border Protection have issued Millions of dollars in Federal Grants to local law enforcement to buy the hardware.
__________________________________________________________________________________

RECENT MILITARY "TRAINING" ACTIVITIES IN MANY U.S. CITIES:

HOUSTON:  Following reports of a military exercise occurring in Miami this week, KTRK-TV shot video of military-style helicopters roaming the skies in Houston, Texas. There have also been several reports of gunfire in the area.  The U.S. Army tells KTRK-TV that they are overseeing a “multi-agency training drill” at the old Carnegie High School on Houston’s south side. There were reportedly armed men in fatigues, a lot of firearms and what many believed were real live rounds.  The Army did not give any additional details regarding what the training is all about or why it is being conducted in Houston.

MINNEAPOLIS: 
Just as Chicagoans saw Black Hawk helicopters with “heavily armed men” hanging out of them in April this year and were told it was part of a routine training exercise, so too are the residents of Minneapolis being alerted to an upcoming urban training.
WCCO (via CBS Local) stated Monday that residents are not to be alarmed if they see a similar scene of low-flying military helicopters. It reported the U.S. Special Operations Command would be conducting exercises from now through the beginning of September.

What scenarios could the military be trying to make as real as possible?  Glenn Beck has some ideas and it makes sense.  Either a massive change in military training has taken place OR the government is preparing for “something big,” such as a civil breakdown.


MIAMI: Police sent out a warning [last] Monday that multiple police agencies would be providing support for a joint military training exercise somewhere over Miami and elsewhere in the county. The exercise will include the use of military helicopters.  But those who don’t read the papers were terrified at the sight of soldiers rappelling onto rooftops, as what sounded like machine gun fire echoed off the high-rises.  Josh Epperson, an artist who was visiting Miami during the drill, said “I heard the machine gun fire and then I hit the deck…I didn’t know what to expect, and it was one of the loudest things I’d ever heard.”  One local resident, Frances Jerrals, didn’t understand what was happening when she saw military helicopters flying over her southeast Houston neighborhood.
“When you see this, you think the worst. When you hear this, you think the worst,” Jerrals told KTRK-TV.  “I felt like I was in a war zone…It was nonstop. I was terrified,” she added.

__________________________________________________________________________________

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND OTHER AGENCIES ORDER HUGE QUANTITIES OF AMMUNITION:  These various agencies have ordered more than
1.6 BILLION rounds of ammunition! when you add up all the contracts.  This ammunition is designated for use here in the continental United States!  The question begs, is the Government stockpiling ammunition to be used against the American People?  Furthermore, future purchases are now be hidden from the American People by new Government policies.  Why?


__________________________________________________________________________________
DHS PURCHASES 2700 ARMORED VEHICLES FOR USE IN THE UNITED STATES:

The Department of Homeland Security (through the U.S. Army Forces Command) recently retrofitted 2,717 of these ‘Mine Resistant Protected’ vehicles for service on the streets of the United States.


_________________________________________________________________________________

DHS ORDERS ORDERED $2 MILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF "NO MORE HESITATION TARGETS" These targets depicted pregnant women, children, and elderly gun owners in residential settings as “non-traditional threats,”
_________________________________________________________________________________

R.I.O.T. SOFTWARE, DEVELOPED FOR DHS, TRACKS SOCIAL MEDIA USERS:
In this video obtained by the Guardian, Raytheon's 'principal investigator' Brian Urch explains how the Rapid Information Overlay Technology (Riot) software uses photographs on social networks. These images sometimes contain latitude and longitude details – automatically embedded by smartphones within so-called 'exif header data'. Riot pulls out this information, analyzing not only the photographs posted by individuals, but also the location where these images were taken.



_________________________________________________________________________________

HOMELAND SECURITY GIVEN GREEN LIGHT TO MONITOR AMERICAN JOURNALISTS - JANUARY 9, 2012:

Under the National Operations Center (NOC)’s Media Monitoring Initiative that emerged from the Department of Homeland Security in November, Washington has written permission to collect and retain personal information from journalists, news anchors, reporters or anyone who uses “traditional and/or social media in real time to keep their audience situationally aware and informed.”

>CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION<

_________________________________________________________________________________ 

GENIA PRODUCTS CREATED FOR DHS:

Genia products specializes in the development of lasers, capable of conducting laser scans from 164 feet.  Lasers are capable are even capable of detecting gun powder.  Imagine a suitable vehicle equipped in front of your home conducting such a scan.  Are you over the "Government Limit" of storing ammunition? 

That could cause you to be classified as a "Beligerent" under the NDAA and permit your indefinite  detention, without the writ of Habeus Corpus. Some of their information has been removed from their site, but here is >GENIA PRODUCTS< ______________________________________________________________________________ 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY REPORTING:
It has been reported that Department of Homeland Security has issued memo's to suppliers of MRE's to Report any "large purchases" made by individuals.  Certain books, which are deliberately NOT being named here, also flag individuals to the Department of Homeland Security.

Do you still have doubts?  Here's a COMPLETE LIST OF ALL THE DHS MEMOS for "SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY REPORTING FLYERS"

_________________________________________________________________________________
DR JAMES GARROW ALLEGES PRESIDENT OBAMA ASKING TOP GENERALS IF THEY'LL FIRE ON U.S. CITIZIENS, IF ORDERED TO DO SO:


It has also been reported that members of the 28th Infantry Division, the Pennsylvania National Guard, have also been asked if they would obey orders to forcibly confiscate guns from law abiding citizens.
 __________________________________________________________________________________


This new National ID would utilize a computer chip and biometric features that would permit Radio Frequency ID signals (RFID) to monitor the movements of American Citizens along roadways, bridges, tunnels, office buildings and even any doorway with a sensor.  Not to mention the ability to store every detail of your personal, private information, including your medical records and anything else deemed "important."
________________________________________________________________________________

 

>>Supreme Court Rules Government can Spy on Americans <<

Read here to see just how your Phone, Computer and even GPS unit can now be searched and exactly how it's done!


__________________________________________________________________________________


THE 2ND AMENDMENT - THAT WHICH UNDERPINS ALL OTHER FREEDOMS AND LIBERTIES UNDER THE CONSTITUTION:  We now have the greatest, sustained assault on the Second Amendment that this Country has ever seen.....Including continued threats from various Government entities of  additional, potentially unconstitutional, Executive Action and by some, even proposals confiscation.


Unconstitutional Official Acts
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:
"The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land it is superseded thereby.  No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."
-----------------------------------------------------

Americans need to WAKE UP and understand the almost daily, incremental loss of their Liberties.  History is replete with examples of how his this very same model has been used and abused by Governments to create oppressive, totalitarian regimes.

Anyone who is NOT concerned simply doesn't understand history and is therefore doomed to repeat it.

PLEASE SHARE THIS WITH ALL YOU KNOW - AMERICANS NEED TO WAKE UP!
Please LIKE and SHARE on FACEBOOK at bottom of page 
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/28/2013

YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE UNDER ATTACK!

Posted by Tom


The "Home of the Free" and "Land of the Brave" is rapidly becoming the "Home of the Controlled" and "Land of the Intimidated".  The fundamental right of Americans to share their feelings in protest, specifically regarding those who need to hear their message the most, may now become a FELONY!

The Second Amendment has been under attack for some time and now it's the First Amendment!

Let's take a look at H.R. 347, the "Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011," perhaps a better label would be the "First Amendment Eradication Act"  Incidentally, only three members of the House Of Representatives voted against this, among these were Justin Amash and Ron Paul.


H.R. 347 Explained:
The law is allowed to be used against anyone who knowingly enters or remains in a restricted building or grounds without lawful authority to do so, but those grounds are considered any area where someone — rather it’s President Obama, Senator Santorum or Governor Romney — will be temporarily visiting, whether or not the public is even made aware of their presence. Entering such a facility is thus outlawed, as is disrupting the orderly conduct of “official functions,” engaging in disorderly conduct “within such proximity to” the event or acting violent to anyone, anywhere near the premises. Under that verbiage, that means a peaceful protest outside a candidate’s concession speech would be a federal offense, but those occurrences covered as special event of national significance don’t just stop there, either. And neither does the list of covered persons that receive protection!....

With Secret Service protection awarded to visiting dignitaries, this also means, for instance, that the federal government could consider a demonstration against any foreign president on American soil as a violation of federal law, as long as it could be considered disruptive to whatever function is occurring.

In short, they can assign Secret Service protection to anyone they like, without your knowledge, and simply by being in the proximity to these persons can make you a FELON if you're peacefully protesting on any given subject or in ANY area they may choose to be in.

Free Speech is undisputably essential to preserving a democracy and in fact ensures the free exchange of ideas that recognizes Human Rights under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Let's look at how Chicago handles some basic Freedoms:

Christopher Drew thought he was exercising his First Amendment when he recorded an altercation with cops in 2009, but for the Chicago, Illinois artist, he couldn’t be further from the truth. He was approached by an officer with the Chicago Police Department three years ago and questioned about the artwork he was selling on the city’s State Street. When law enforcement realized that they were being recorded, Drew was dished felony charges under the eavesdropping law and ended up spending a few days in jail. Drew asked an Illinois judge to dismiss the hefty felony charge, but the court rejected his plea. Later this year his case is expected to go to trial, and if found guilty, Drew could serve 15 years in prison.
 
“In a democracy you are suppose to oversee your public servants. If they’re doing wrong you’re suppose to bring it to the attention of other citizens and to the court,” Drew explained to RT. “They have no privacy right, they are in public and they are on the public dime and doing public duty. That means that we’re their employer. We have a right to record our employees and bring that evidence to the system that they are doing wrong.”

Michael Allison has become a victim of the police state’s bizarre law, too. He was at his mom’s house in Illinois when cops showed up and questions the automobiles he had parked on the property. When Allison began recording his conversation with the cops, he was cuffed and charged with violating the eavesdropping law. Those charges included five counts of eavesdropping, each with a maximum of 15 years in prison.

For videotaping his own conversation with a cop on his family property, Allison could have served the rest of his life behind bars.


Never forget this.  The 2nd Amendment UNDERPINS and ENSURES ALL OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!  You think it's outdated?  You better look around and think again!  Your liberties are being taken from you as we speak!





Let's take a look and see how MAYOR BLOOMBERG responds to a Journalist asking questions.  Dare you ask questions of the political elite or the Police will be used to intimidate you.....The Major who says we don't need guns sure thinks he needs and is entitled to MANY!



1/01/2013

Georgetown Law Professor: Give Up "Archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil" Constitution

Posted by Brian

It seems that every other day, some liberal professor from some "elite" university is exposing the absolute tripe that our young people are being exposed to, and taught, at our institutions of higher learning.
This time, it's some nut-job from Georgetown University, a Constitutional law professor named Louis Michael Seidman, who goes by three names, so you know he thinks he is important.  This gas bag, in a New York Times op-ed piece, says that the U.S. should just toss out the Constitution, with "all of its archaic, idiosyncratic, and downright evil provisions".
I often wonder why these people, who believe that this nation, our founding, and our Constitution are so fundamentally flawed and evil, aren't rushing for the nearest door to escape this oppressive place.  Why would you want to stay in a place that you hate and despise.  Instead, these malcontents and wretched refuse enter our public schools and institutions of higher learning, and spew their poison into the minds of malleable children and young adults.
Professor Seidman is one more liberal who, to his credit, has the guts to say that he hates this country and what it stands for.  Now, if he just had the guts to buy a ticket to the socialist utopia of his choice, and quit trying to screw up my country.



HERE’S WHY THIS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSOR THINKS AMERICA SHOULD ‘GIVE UP THE CONSTITUTION’
Posted on December 31, 2012 at 12:07pm by Becket Adams

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University, has a simple plan for getting the U.S. back on track: Let’s give up the Constitution.

No, really. That’s the title of his New York Times op-ed. His basic argument is that America is not in a perilous financial crisis because of simple, vapid, and dishonest little men. The U.S. is in trouble because of our unreasonable adherence to an outdated document.

“As the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions,” writes Seidman.
Continue Reading

Enhanced by Zemanta

12/17/2012

Ed "Sgt." Schultz Goes All Hitler - 'Confiscate Guns'

Posted by Brian

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Founding Fathers,  U.S. Constitution, 2nd Amendment

"a Glock pistol qualifies as an assault weapon."
"Write all the feel good laws you want, it's the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact."
Ed Schultz on Twitter
How very Hitler/Stalin-esque of you Ed! Moron!

MSNBC’s Ed Schultz Talks Gun ‘Confiscation’
By Dan Gainor | December 16, 2012 | 07:23

Liberals always say they don’t want to take away guns. But give them an awful tragedy like the Newtown, Conn. shooting and they get bolder and more honest. MSNBC host Ed Schultz showed a rare bout of such honesty during a brief Twitter exchange Saturday. Schultz asked “Why should anyone own an assault rifle ?” and followed it up by saying “it's the confiscation of these types of weapons that counts and will have an impact.”
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

12/10/2012

Judicial Activism: NC Judge Rules "Choose Life" Plate Unconstitutional

Posted by Brian

Proposed NC "Choose Life" License Plate
Oh the horror!
America is losing the culture war.
Do you believe in family values?  Bigot!  Do you believe in Judeo-Christian values?  Racist bigot!  Are you patriotic?  Redneck cracker!  Do you support the Constitution?  Right-wing, tea-bagging, redneck cracker!!
The Courts, stacked with activist judges, no longer look to the Constitution for their rulings.  They rule based on their own personal beliefs, or on judicial decisions from some "enlightened" court in Europe. Our Constitution is so outdated.
They circumvent the will and the votes of our citizens, overturning measures and propositions passed with large majorities. They are routinely ignoring our Constitution, or twisting themselves into pretzels to looking for concocted "emanations and penumbras" hiding within the words of the Framers, and which only they have the intellect with which to decipher them for we unwashed masses.
So it is with a judge in North Carolina who has ruled that it is unconstitutional for the state to make and sell license plates with the words "Choose Life"( Shown above) on them.   His reasoning?  There isn't a plate which supports "Pro-Choice" members of the community. Well, if that is all that is stopping them, I propose a license plate designed around the illustration below.
There! All fixed!

My proposal for the NC "Pro-Choice" License plate

Judge finds NC ‘Choose Life’ plates unconstitutional 
Posted on: 10:40 am, December 10, 2012, by Joe Borlik, updated on: 11:25am, December 10, 2012

RALEIGH, N.C. – A federal judge has ruled it is unconstitutional for North Carolina to issue pro-life license plates unless the state offers similar plates supporting abortion rights.

U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox ruled on Friday that North Carolina cannot produce or distribute the “Choose Life” plate.
Enhanced by Zemanta

11/16/2012

Pelosi: The 11th Amendment?...14th? Whatever, I'm with the Constitution."

Posted by Brian
Nancy Pelosi.  Idiocy on parade!
Thank you San Francisco for providing Americans a person who remind us on a daily basis of the absolutely arrogant, mental deficients people like you give the charge of overseeing our government and the People.

More Idiocy From Pelosi:
Nancy Pelosi's Greatest Hits



Pelosi Unsure on 11th & 14th Amendments: ‘Whatever It Is, I’m with the Constitution’
By Elizabeth Harrington November 15, 2012
 (CNSNews.com) – House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) confused the 14th and 11th Amendments when suggesting the president could bypass Congress and unilaterally raise the debt ceiling, saying, “Whatever it is, I’m with the constitution.”
During her weekly press conference on Capitol Hill on Thursday, Pelosi was asked about the need for two separate deals in Congress to both raise the approaching debt ceiling and address the expiration of the Bush era tax cuts.
“I would hope not,” Pelosi said.  “I would hope that by now—well, me, I’m with the 11th Amendment, so.”
“Is it the 11th Amendment?” she asked.
“That—14th is it?”
“Whatever it is, I’m with the Constitution of the United States,” said the Minority Leader.
Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

9/18/2012

RON PAUL FANS: "A TIME FOR CHOOSING" 2012

Posted by Brian
H/T Breitbart
Ronald Reagan once gave one of the great speeches in American political history - "A Time For Choosing". (Video of speech, below)  Though it did not move Barry Goldwater into the Oval Office, it laid the foundation for Ronald Reagan's ascension to that Office sixteen years later. It is time for choosing again.
A small number of Ron Paul fans still cling to the idea that he or Gary Johnson still have a legitimate shot at winning the White House in November.  This is not only unrealistic, it's delusional.  At this time there are only two realistic choices - Mitt Romney or Barack Obama.
As Kurt Schlichter makes clear in his article below, this is no time to play around with some morally superior notion that you won't compromise your ideological purity to vote for someone like Mitt Romney.  In other elections, like 1992 and 1996, though I disagreed with Ross Perot, I understood to a degree the need for people to lodge a "protest vote" for Perot.  In both cases, particularly 1992 (Perot won 18.9% of the vote), those "protests" ensured the election of Bill Clinton.  Clinton remains the only candidate to win both election and reelection to President with less than 50% of the vote in either election.  The difference this time is that, though I didn't and still don't support Bill Clinton, he was no Marxist ideologue.  Barack Obama is. The stakes this election are greater that they've ever been in my lifetime.  Another 4 years of Barack Obama will ensure that the future United States will no longer resemble the republic that has been a beacon of hope and freedom for over 225 years.
Ron Paul supporters, the choice is: An imperfect Mitt Romney, or a Barack Obama who stands for everything you hate. Make a choice

TIME FOR RON PAUL FANS TO SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION

by KURT SCHLICHTER  18 Sep 2012, 11:14 AM
There is no more time for games, no room for hurt feelings. Ron Paul fans, you need to choose, because not voting for Romney is a vote for Obama. It’s that simple. And you could make the difference.
Maybe Romney isn’t the uncompromising Ayn Rand hero you’d design if you could build your ideal candidate from scratch, but he’s a lot better than the guy on whose watch this happened:

Continue Reading Here

Ronald Reagan - "A Time For Choosing"

Enhanced by Zemanta