Posted by Brian
New Trier, Ill - Northeastern Cook County, Chicago suburb
Tired of hearing lies, half-truths, and being referred to as Nazi's and Chihuahua's, a man identifying himself as a veteran stood up and educated a group of snide, elitest Chicago Democrats drawing cheers and shout of approval from the crowd who had shown up to forum billing itself as a "space for real conversation", only to be told to "shush" time and again.
Don't take my word for it. Watch the video. Pay attention especially to the guy at the 15 second mark, who addresses the room in a tone of voice normally reserved for a 2-year-old. This is the voice of the elitest who views himself as intellectually superior to those around him, and is disgusted to even be in the same room to people he views as lower than primordial sludge, and thus addresses them with a voice that drips with contempt.
This was not a forum to have a "real conversation", as advertised. This was a lecture, put on by leftists, to allow them to tell everyone HOW things should be, and how they are going to be. Unfortunately for them, a US military veteran, along with a whole bunch of pro-Second Amendment, pro-Constitution people showed up and told them how things are.
Remember. There are a whole lot more people like this veteran, who love our Country and our Constitution, than the media and the leftists want you to believe.
More At Legal Insurrection
Showing posts with label Second Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Second Amendment. Show all posts
12/19/2013
9/16/2013
Texas: You Have the Right to Keep and Bear Arms If You Are In A State Militia
Posted by Brian
WAIT UNTIL YOU SEE HOW A HIGH SCHOOL TEXTBOOK SUMMARIZES THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED IN THE SECOND AMENDMENT
Sep. 16, 2013 3:24pm Jason Howerton
Controversy is brewing around a school district in Denton, Texas, that is said to be using a United States history book that seems to summarize the Second Amendment inaccurately. However, the Denton Independent School District maintains it only uses the book as “supplemental” material and is “disseminating the correct information on the Second Amendment” from other texts.
But there are several other schools that appear to be using the book, too.
“The people have the right to keep and bear arms in a state militia,” the definition in the book, “United States History: Preparing for the Advanced Placement Examination,” which acts as a study guide for the Advanced Placement U.S. history test, reads.
Continue Reading at The Blaze
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
WAIT UNTIL YOU SEE HOW A HIGH SCHOOL TEXTBOOK SUMMARIZES THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED IN THE SECOND AMENDMENT
Sep. 16, 2013 3:24pm Jason Howerton
Controversy is brewing around a school district in Denton, Texas, that is said to be using a United States history book that seems to summarize the Second Amendment inaccurately. However, the Denton Independent School District maintains it only uses the book as “supplemental” material and is “disseminating the correct information on the Second Amendment” from other texts.
But there are several other schools that appear to be using the book, too.
“The people have the right to keep and bear arms in a state militia,” the definition in the book, “United States History: Preparing for the Advanced Placement Examination,” which acts as a study guide for the Advanced Placement U.S. history test, reads.
Continue Reading at The Blaze
Related articles
Sen. FrankenFeinstein Already Calling For New Gun Control Laws Only Hours After DC Shooting
Posted by Brian
Three days ago, Dianne Feinstein wanted to be the arbiter on who she feels is and isn't a reporter, and thus protected by the first amendment. A month ago, she defended NSA spying on American citizens. Now, the reptilian Feinstein again crawls out from under her rock, wanting to limit 2nd Amendment rights for ordinary Americans. Is there anything in the Bill of Rights that she does support for average Americans?
Molon Labe Senator! Molon Labe!
Feinstein calls for new gun control laws again after Navy Yard shooting
6:19 PM 09/16/2013
California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein is renewing her call for new gun-control laws because of Monday’s deadly Navy Yard shooting. “When will enough be enough?” Feinstein said in a statement Monday evening.
“Congress must stop shirking its responsibility and resume a thoughtful debate on gun violence in this country,” she said. “We must do more to stop this endless loss of life.”
Read More at The Daily Caller
Three days ago, Dianne Feinstein wanted to be the arbiter on who she feels is and isn't a reporter, and thus protected by the first amendment. A month ago, she defended NSA spying on American citizens. Now, the reptilian Feinstein again crawls out from under her rock, wanting to limit 2nd Amendment rights for ordinary Americans. Is there anything in the Bill of Rights that she does support for average Americans?
Molon Labe Senator! Molon Labe!
Feinstein calls for new gun control laws again after Navy Yard shooting
6:19 PM 09/16/2013
California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein is renewing her call for new gun-control laws because of Monday’s deadly Navy Yard shooting. “When will enough be enough?” Feinstein said in a statement Monday evening.
“Congress must stop shirking its responsibility and resume a thoughtful debate on gun violence in this country,” she said. “We must do more to stop this endless loss of life.”
Read More at The Daily Caller
Related articles
'Fascist': Matt Drudge blasts Dianne Feinstein for trying to define who is and isn't a 'real reporter'
ActivistPost - Dianne Feinstein: First Amendment Is A Special Privilege - 16 September 2013
Feinstein defends Congress intelligence oversight amid new revelations
Dianne Feinstein Says No to Free Speech for Bloggers
Feinstein Defends NSA Oversight
Ehhhh!! 'The Fonz' Jumps the Shark Again! Pushes For Gun Control as DC Shootings Still in Progress!!
Posted by Brian
Henry 'The Fonz' Winkler is apparently an acolyte of Rahm Emmanual and his "never let a crisis go to waste" philosophy, as he tweeted out his pro-gun control thoughts while some of the victims were still bleeding out.
Henry Winkler, whose Happy Day's character 'Fonzie' was arguably the coolest guy in America for a few years until the famous "jump the shark" episode, couldn't wait for the facts to come out before weighing in. That he weighed in is not a shock. It was only a matter of time before some Hollywood leftist would. What is shocking is that it appears he beat Michael Moore to the punch. As of this writing, Moore is still hung up on Syria and Larry Summers removing himself from the FED job.
Winkler isn't as prolific in his bashing of pro-Second Amendment folks as the faux conservative David Frum, who took to Twitter with the following:
Hey! Frum's entitled to his opinion but don't, as The Blaze did, call him a conservative commentator. Even Frum has had to admit that his views no longer align with conservatism on everything from healthcare reform, monetary policy, social spending to aid the unemployed, man-made global warming, and as everyone can see, that pesky old Second Amendment.
What's truly sick is that these ghouls don't have the decency to wait until all the facts are in before turning these types of things into political hot potatoes. You won't find Frum, Winkler or their ilk, of objectively looking at the numerous killings of young blacks in Washington D.C. or Chicago, and the tough gun control laws they have there which prevent law-abiding citizens the ability to protect themselves in those cities.
Nor will the subject of allowing trained and licensed people to used concealed carry weapons on military and government installations. I guarantee you, if our trained men and women of the military were allowed to carry their own personal firearms legally on base, incidents like today, or the Fort Hood shooting either wouldn't occur, or the carnage would be much less if these sicko's knew that nearly everyone on the base was armed..
That would make too much sense.
Henry 'The Fonz' Winkler is apparently an acolyte of Rahm Emmanual and his "never let a crisis go to waste" philosophy, as he tweeted out his pro-gun control thoughts while some of the victims were still bleeding out.
Henry Winkler, whose Happy Day's character 'Fonzie' was arguably the coolest guy in America for a few years until the famous "jump the shark" episode, couldn't wait for the facts to come out before weighing in. That he weighed in is not a shock. It was only a matter of time before some Hollywood leftist would. What is shocking is that it appears he beat Michael Moore to the punch. As of this writing, Moore is still hung up on Syria and Larry Summers removing himself from the FED job.
Winkler isn't as prolific in his bashing of pro-Second Amendment folks as the faux conservative David Frum, who took to Twitter with the following:
Hey! Frum's entitled to his opinion but don't, as The Blaze did, call him a conservative commentator. Even Frum has had to admit that his views no longer align with conservatism on everything from healthcare reform, monetary policy, social spending to aid the unemployed, man-made global warming, and as everyone can see, that pesky old Second Amendment.
What's truly sick is that these ghouls don't have the decency to wait until all the facts are in before turning these types of things into political hot potatoes. You won't find Frum, Winkler or their ilk, of objectively looking at the numerous killings of young blacks in Washington D.C. or Chicago, and the tough gun control laws they have there which prevent law-abiding citizens the ability to protect themselves in those cities.
Nor will the subject of allowing trained and licensed people to used concealed carry weapons on military and government installations. I guarantee you, if our trained men and women of the military were allowed to carry their own personal firearms legally on base, incidents like today, or the Fort Hood shooting either wouldn't occur, or the carnage would be much less if these sicko's knew that nearly everyone on the base was armed..
That would make too much sense.
9/12/2013
‘I’M GOING TO CUT YOU OFF RIGHT THERE’: CNN ANCHOR CALLS OUT OUSTED COLORADO DEMOCRAT FOR BLAMING RECALL ON ‘VOTER SUPPRESSION’
Posted by Brian
Sep. 12, 2013 5:00pm Jason Howerton
Refusing to accept her defeat gracefully, recalled Colorado state Sen. Angela Giron appeared on CNN Thursday to blame her embarrassing ouster on “voter suppression.” Earlier this week, Colorado residents voted to recall Giron and Democratic Senate President John Morse over a number of gun control laws they helped pushed through the Legislature.
“We know what really happened here. Yes, we had the strong NRA and you have a person like Mr. Head, but what this story is really about, it’s about voter suppression,” Giron said.
The former state senator claimed that 70 percent of Colorado residents vote by mail, but there was no mail-in voting for the recall election. Surprisingly, she was quickly called out by a CNN anchor.
“OK, forgive me, but I’m going to cut you off right there. Because if we talk voter suppression, I’ve read reports on lack of popularity on your behalf. Let’s just not go there,” CNN’s Brooke Baldwin said. Being reprimanded by the CNN anchor left Giron looking like this:
Sep. 12, 2013 5:00pm Jason Howerton
Refusing to accept her defeat gracefully, recalled Colorado state Sen. Angela Giron appeared on CNN Thursday to blame her embarrassing ouster on “voter suppression.” Earlier this week, Colorado residents voted to recall Giron and Democratic Senate President John Morse over a number of gun control laws they helped pushed through the Legislature.
“We know what really happened here. Yes, we had the strong NRA and you have a person like Mr. Head, but what this story is really about, it’s about voter suppression,” Giron said.
The former state senator claimed that 70 percent of Colorado residents vote by mail, but there was no mail-in voting for the recall election. Surprisingly, she was quickly called out by a CNN anchor.
“OK, forgive me, but I’m going to cut you off right there. Because if we talk voter suppression, I’ve read reports on lack of popularity on your behalf. Let’s just not go there,” CNN’s Brooke Baldwin said. Being reprimanded by the CNN anchor left Giron looking like this:
READ MORE at THE BLAZE
Related articles
'Call it for what it is!' Visibly frustrated Angela Giron blames her recall on voter suppression [video]
CNN Anchor Shuts Down Colo. Recall Loser Who Claims Voter Suppression
Angela Giron's pre-recall tweets don't exactly scream concern for 'voter suppression'
DNC Chief Wasserman-Schultz Blames 'Voter Suppression, Pure And Simple' For Successful Recall Of Colorado Gun Controllers
8/06/2013
Gun-related violent crimes drop as sales soar in Va.
Posted by Brian
Posted: Friday, November 23, 2012 11:20 pm | Updated: 12:05 am, Mon Jan 28, 2013.
BY MARK BOWES
Gun-related violent crime in Virginia has dropped steadily over the past six years as the sale of firearms has soared to a new record, according to an analysis of state crime data with state records of gun sales. The total number of firearms purchased in Virginia increased 73 percent from 2006 to 2011. When state population increases are factored in, gun purchases per 100,000 Virginians rose 63 percent.
But the total number of gun-related violent crimes fell 24 percent over that period, and when adjusted for population, gun-related offenses dropped more than 27 percent, from 79 crimes per 100,000 in 2006 to 57 crimes in 2011.
The numbers appear to contradict a long-running popular narrative that more guns cause more violent crime, said Virginia Commonwealth University professor Thomas R. Baker, who compared Virginia crime data for those years with gun-dealer sales estimates obtained by the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
Read More at Richmond Times-Dispatch
Posted: Friday, November 23, 2012 11:20 pm | Updated: 12:05 am, Mon Jan 28, 2013.
BY MARK BOWES
Gun-related violent crime in Virginia has dropped steadily over the past six years as the sale of firearms has soared to a new record, according to an analysis of state crime data with state records of gun sales. The total number of firearms purchased in Virginia increased 73 percent from 2006 to 2011. When state population increases are factored in, gun purchases per 100,000 Virginians rose 63 percent.
But the total number of gun-related violent crimes fell 24 percent over that period, and when adjusted for population, gun-related offenses dropped more than 27 percent, from 79 crimes per 100,000 in 2006 to 57 crimes in 2011.
The numbers appear to contradict a long-running popular narrative that more guns cause more violent crime, said Virginia Commonwealth University professor Thomas R. Baker, who compared Virginia crime data for those years with gun-dealer sales estimates obtained by the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
Read More at Richmond Times-Dispatch
7/08/2013
WATCH - Iraq Vet Reams Lawmakers, NY SAFE Act : "You Stand on the Bodies of Dead Children" for "Political Expediency"
Posted by Brian
Iraq Vet and law enforcement officer Aaron Weiss got in his two cents worth while addressing the Duchess County Legislature in New York. Impassioned and visibly moved, he makes a powerful case for the people's right to keep and bear arms, while illuminating the cowardice of those who would "stand on the bodies of dead children" to ram through legislation for the supposed "public good".
Aaron Weiss is a true patriot, and his words should be spread far and wide.
Iraq Vet and law enforcement officer Aaron Weiss got in his two cents worth while addressing the Duchess County Legislature in New York. Impassioned and visibly moved, he makes a powerful case for the people's right to keep and bear arms, while illuminating the cowardice of those who would "stand on the bodies of dead children" to ram through legislation for the supposed "public good".
Aaron Weiss is a true patriot, and his words should be spread far and wide.
4/02/2013
***BREAKING*** Obama Admin Votes To Approve U.N. Gun Control, Void 2nd Amendment!!
Posted by Brian
While the Obama Administration is embroiled in two gun-running scandals, ("Operation Fast and Furious", and the reported smuggling of weapons from Libya to Syrian rebels, which resulted in the Benghazi Embassy attacks and the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, two Navy SEALS, and a fourth embassy person), they voted to approve the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty.
Sold as a way to regulate the sale and transport of illegal weapons between countries, the treaty is a massive power grab by the international community to regulate the rights of individuals to own or possess personal firearms. It requires individual countries to maintain a national registry for the sale and possession of all firearms (link).
Somebody, please show me where any President has the authority to cede the sovereignty of our country and its Constitution to an international body. Particularly one made up of dictators, thugs, and despots. This is a treasonous act by this President and this Administration, who has stated that he is "not coming for your guns", then turns around and votes to have the U.N. do just that! His goal, along with all leftists is to disarm citizens, not only in this country, but all over the world. The only ones left with weapons will be the governments and criminals.
So much easier to control "the masses" that way!
UN Passes Sweeping Gun Control Measure
Tuesday, 02 Apr 2013 12:50 PM
The United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday signed off on a sweeping, first-of-its-kind treaty to regulate the international arms trade, brushing aside worries from U.S. gun rights advocates that the pact could lead to a national firearms registry and disrupt the American gun market.
The long-debated U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) requires countries to regulate and control the export of weaponry such as battle tanks, combat vehicles and aircraft and attack helicopters, as well as parts and ammunition for such weapons. It also provides that signatories will not violate arms embargoes, international treaties regarding illicit trafficking, or sell weaponry to a countries for genocide, crimes against humanity or other war crimes.
With the Obama administration supporting the final treaty draft, the General Assembly vote was 154 to 3, with 23 abstentions.
Read More at News Max
While the Obama Administration is embroiled in two gun-running scandals, ("Operation Fast and Furious", and the reported smuggling of weapons from Libya to Syrian rebels, which resulted in the Benghazi Embassy attacks and the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, two Navy SEALS, and a fourth embassy person), they voted to approve the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty.
Sold as a way to regulate the sale and transport of illegal weapons between countries, the treaty is a massive power grab by the international community to regulate the rights of individuals to own or possess personal firearms. It requires individual countries to maintain a national registry for the sale and possession of all firearms (link).
Somebody, please show me where any President has the authority to cede the sovereignty of our country and its Constitution to an international body. Particularly one made up of dictators, thugs, and despots. This is a treasonous act by this President and this Administration, who has stated that he is "not coming for your guns", then turns around and votes to have the U.N. do just that! His goal, along with all leftists is to disarm citizens, not only in this country, but all over the world. The only ones left with weapons will be the governments and criminals.
So much easier to control "the masses" that way!
UN Passes Sweeping Gun Control Measure
Tuesday, 02 Apr 2013 12:50 PM
The United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday signed off on a sweeping, first-of-its-kind treaty to regulate the international arms trade, brushing aside worries from U.S. gun rights advocates that the pact could lead to a national firearms registry and disrupt the American gun market.
The long-debated U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) requires countries to regulate and control the export of weaponry such as battle tanks, combat vehicles and aircraft and attack helicopters, as well as parts and ammunition for such weapons. It also provides that signatories will not violate arms embargoes, international treaties regarding illicit trafficking, or sell weaponry to a countries for genocide, crimes against humanity or other war crimes.
With the Obama administration supporting the final treaty draft, the General Assembly vote was 154 to 3, with 23 abstentions.
Read More at News Max
Related articles
3/18/2013
California "No Rights" List: Gun Registration Leading to Confiscation
Posted by Brian
Does anyone still believe that firearms registration doesn't lead to confiscation? California Attorney General Kamal Harris apparently believes that it not only gives her the authority, but she is putting her belief into action.
She claims that law enforcement are only confiscating firearms from those who are no longer "qualified" to own a weapon, even though they may have been purchased legally. She claims that it is for people who have been deemed to have "lost their rights" to own firearms due to criminal convictions, restraining orders, or mental health detentions. There are currently 19,700 Californians on the "No rights" list. To date, 10,000 firearms have been confiscated.
Already, there is a man who had his firearms confiscated because his wife "voluntarily" had herself committed to a hospital to adjust her medications.
The program, which has already been given $24 million to implement, leaves me to wonder how many veterans who may need mental health care, make the decision not to seek treatment if doing so puts them on a permanent list which denies them the right to own firearms.
There is no word yet on what the state plans to do about the millions of illegal firearms owned by criminals and illegal immigrants once they have confiscated firearms from those who have purchased and registered their firearms legally.
California again proves that purpose of registration is confiscation
SECOND AMENDMENT MARCH 13, 2013BY: KURT HOFMANN
From Bloomberg: Wearing bulletproof vests and carrying 40-caliber Glock pistols, nine California Justice Department agents assembled outside a ranch-style house in a suburb east of Los Angeles. They were looking for a gun owner who’d recently spent two days in a mental hospital.
How did they know this individual was a gun owner?
California is the only state that tracks and disarms people with legally registered guns who have lost the right to own them, according to Attorney General Kamala Harris.
Ah, yes--Kamala Harris. We've discussed her before, regarding her advocacy of "body armor control," and her perhaps even more chilling apparent disregard for the Fourth Amendment:
The idea, she contends, is to remind legal gun owners how to behave.
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.
Read more at Examiner.com
Does anyone still believe that firearms registration doesn't lead to confiscation? California Attorney General Kamal Harris apparently believes that it not only gives her the authority, but she is putting her belief into action.
She claims that law enforcement are only confiscating firearms from those who are no longer "qualified" to own a weapon, even though they may have been purchased legally. She claims that it is for people who have been deemed to have "lost their rights" to own firearms due to criminal convictions, restraining orders, or mental health detentions. There are currently 19,700 Californians on the "No rights" list. To date, 10,000 firearms have been confiscated.
Already, there is a man who had his firearms confiscated because his wife "voluntarily" had herself committed to a hospital to adjust her medications.
The program, which has already been given $24 million to implement, leaves me to wonder how many veterans who may need mental health care, make the decision not to seek treatment if doing so puts them on a permanent list which denies them the right to own firearms.
There is no word yet on what the state plans to do about the millions of illegal firearms owned by criminals and illegal immigrants once they have confiscated firearms from those who have purchased and registered their firearms legally.
California again proves that purpose of registration is confiscation
SECOND AMENDMENT MARCH 13, 2013BY: KURT HOFMANN
From Bloomberg: Wearing bulletproof vests and carrying 40-caliber Glock pistols, nine California Justice Department agents assembled outside a ranch-style house in a suburb east of Los Angeles. They were looking for a gun owner who’d recently spent two days in a mental hospital.
How did they know this individual was a gun owner?
California is the only state that tracks and disarms people with legally registered guns who have lost the right to own them, according to Attorney General Kamala Harris.
Ah, yes--Kamala Harris. We've discussed her before, regarding her advocacy of "body armor control," and her perhaps even more chilling apparent disregard for the Fourth Amendment:
The idea, she contends, is to remind legal gun owners how to behave.
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.
Read more at Examiner.com
Related articles
3/12/2013
CA Bill Would Effectively Outlaw Pistol Ammunition
Posted by Brian
Wacko environmentalists are pushing for a ban on lead ammunition, the consequence of which would leave to pistol owners unable to purchase ammunition for their weapons. As steel core ammunition is defined in the penal code as "armor piercing", the outlawing of lead effectively outlaws all ammunition used by pistols.
Furthermore, the use of steel core ammunition in California is severely limited due to fire hazards created when the bullets strike a rock. Many outdoor ranges limit when steel core can be used , especially during California's notorious "fire season". In addition, shooting steel core on federal forestry land is prohibited entirely, and as many ranges are on land leased from the federal government, they don't allow the firing of this type of ammunition at any time so as not to have their lease pulled.
California Penal Code Section 12320 states:
Any person, firm, or corporation who, within this state knowingly possesses any handgun ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or armor is guilty of a public offense and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in the county jail for a term not to exceed one year, or by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Cal. Penal Code section 12323 Defines "Armor Piercing" as follows:
ABSTRACT: 'Handgun ammunition' means ammunition principally for use in pistols and revolvers as they are defined in Section 12001 of the Penal Code. Handgun ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or amor is defined in the same manner as it is defined in federal law. Penal Code Title 2: Control of Deadly Weapons Chapter 2.6: Ammunition Definitions Section 12323 As used in this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: (a) 'Handgun ammunition' means ammunition principally for use in pistols, revolvers, and other firearms capable of being concealed upon the person, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 12001, notwithstanding that the ammunition may also be used in some rifles. (b) 'Handgun ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or armor' means any ammunition, except a shotgun shell or ammunition primarily designed for use in rifles, that is designed primarily to penetrate a body vest or body shield, and has either of the following characteristics: (1) Has projectile or projectile core constructed entirely, excluding the presence of traces of other substances, from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium, or any equivalent material of similar density or hardness. (2) Is primarily manufactured or designed, by virtue of its shape, cross-sectional density, or any coating applied thereto, including, but not limited to, ammunition commonly known as 'KTW ammunition,' to breach or penetrate a body vest or body shield when fired from a pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person. (c) 'Body vest or shield' means any bullet-resistant material intended to provide ballistic and trauma protection for the wearer or holder. (d) 'Rifle' shall have the same meaning as defined in paragraph (20) of subdivision (c) of Section 12020.
This bill to ban lead ammunition is another end-run by the leftists on the People's Second Amendment Right to keep and bear arms. Their claim that it is to "protect wildlife", smacks of the same flawed logic, based on flawed studies (link), that has caused the electronic industry to switch from lead-based solder to silver solder in the manufacture of electronic components, which increase costs while decreasing reliability. In addition, the metals now used in electronic solder applications come with a host of problems, from phenomenom called "tin-whiskers", "tombstoned components, and cracked solder joints. In addition, the tin and silver-based solders are worse for the environment than the highly reliable lead solder, which has been used for decades.
"RoHS" directives mandated by the EU were based on a scientific study by Professor Timothy Townshend, which showed lead from electronic components was leaching into landfills. The European Union hastily put together a worldwide mandate to eliminate lead from commercial electronic components. They went forward with this directive, despite subsequent studies, including those by Professor Townshend himself, which all contradicted the results of the initial study, and showed no discernible leaching of lead into the landfills by electronic components. But by this time, the EU and other countries has realized the huge financial windfall to be gained through the enactment of the ROHS mandates. In the end, politics and money overrode sound science.
Sound familiar?
Bill would ban Lead Ammunition in California
By TRACIE CONE - Associated Press Monday, Mar. 11, 2013 | 05:35 PM
Environmentalists are pushing legislation to ban lead ammunition in California to prevent toxins from poisoning scavengers that eat animal remains left by hunters.
Final language of the bill was introduced Monday by Assembly Member Anthony Rendon, D-Lakewood, who said the legislation would remove a lingering source of pollution from the environment. It was sponsored by three major environmental groups — Defenders of Wildlife, Audubon California, and the Humane Society of the United States.
"There really is no question that lead ammo is a threat," said Kim Delfino of Defenders of Wildlife. "To pass a bill in California would set the stage for this happening throughout the country, the way low-emissions vehicle standards changed the market nationwide."
Continue Reading at ABC News
![]() |
| The endgame goal? |
Furthermore, the use of steel core ammunition in California is severely limited due to fire hazards created when the bullets strike a rock. Many outdoor ranges limit when steel core can be used , especially during California's notorious "fire season". In addition, shooting steel core on federal forestry land is prohibited entirely, and as many ranges are on land leased from the federal government, they don't allow the firing of this type of ammunition at any time so as not to have their lease pulled.
California Penal Code Section 12320 states:
Any person, firm, or corporation who, within this state knowingly possesses any handgun ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or armor is guilty of a public offense and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, or in the county jail for a term not to exceed one year, or by a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Cal. Penal Code section 12323 Defines "Armor Piercing" as follows:
ABSTRACT: 'Handgun ammunition' means ammunition principally for use in pistols and revolvers as they are defined in Section 12001 of the Penal Code. Handgun ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or amor is defined in the same manner as it is defined in federal law. Penal Code Title 2: Control of Deadly Weapons Chapter 2.6: Ammunition Definitions Section 12323 As used in this chapter, the following definitions shall apply: (a) 'Handgun ammunition' means ammunition principally for use in pistols, revolvers, and other firearms capable of being concealed upon the person, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 12001, notwithstanding that the ammunition may also be used in some rifles. (b) 'Handgun ammunition designed primarily to penetrate metal or armor' means any ammunition, except a shotgun shell or ammunition primarily designed for use in rifles, that is designed primarily to penetrate a body vest or body shield, and has either of the following characteristics: (1) Has projectile or projectile core constructed entirely, excluding the presence of traces of other substances, from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium, or any equivalent material of similar density or hardness. (2) Is primarily manufactured or designed, by virtue of its shape, cross-sectional density, or any coating applied thereto, including, but not limited to, ammunition commonly known as 'KTW ammunition,' to breach or penetrate a body vest or body shield when fired from a pistol, revolver, or other firearm capable of being concealed upon the person. (c) 'Body vest or shield' means any bullet-resistant material intended to provide ballistic and trauma protection for the wearer or holder. (d) 'Rifle' shall have the same meaning as defined in paragraph (20) of subdivision (c) of Section 12020.
This bill to ban lead ammunition is another end-run by the leftists on the People's Second Amendment Right to keep and bear arms. Their claim that it is to "protect wildlife", smacks of the same flawed logic, based on flawed studies (link), that has caused the electronic industry to switch from lead-based solder to silver solder in the manufacture of electronic components, which increase costs while decreasing reliability. In addition, the metals now used in electronic solder applications come with a host of problems, from phenomenom called "tin-whiskers", "tombstoned components, and cracked solder joints. In addition, the tin and silver-based solders are worse for the environment than the highly reliable lead solder, which has been used for decades.
"RoHS" directives mandated by the EU were based on a scientific study by Professor Timothy Townshend, which showed lead from electronic components was leaching into landfills. The European Union hastily put together a worldwide mandate to eliminate lead from commercial electronic components. They went forward with this directive, despite subsequent studies, including those by Professor Townshend himself, which all contradicted the results of the initial study, and showed no discernible leaching of lead into the landfills by electronic components. But by this time, the EU and other countries has realized the huge financial windfall to be gained through the enactment of the ROHS mandates. In the end, politics and money overrode sound science.
Sound familiar?
Bill would ban Lead Ammunition in California
By TRACIE CONE - Associated Press Monday, Mar. 11, 2013 | 05:35 PM
Environmentalists are pushing legislation to ban lead ammunition in California to prevent toxins from poisoning scavengers that eat animal remains left by hunters.
Final language of the bill was introduced Monday by Assembly Member Anthony Rendon, D-Lakewood, who said the legislation would remove a lingering source of pollution from the environment. It was sponsored by three major environmental groups — Defenders of Wildlife, Audubon California, and the Humane Society of the United States.
"There really is no question that lead ammo is a threat," said Kim Delfino of Defenders of Wildlife. "To pass a bill in California would set the stage for this happening throughout the country, the way low-emissions vehicle standards changed the market nationwide."
Continue Reading at ABC News
Related articles
Ban It Harder: Obama's 'Armor-Piercing Bullets' Suggestion
Gun shops face massive ammunition shortage
New Florida bill requires anger management classes before purchasing gun ammunition
California legislation moving forward to ban lead ammunition...
California Seizes Guns as Owners Lose Right to Bear Arms
WI Dems Push to Ban Hunting, Self-Defense Ammunition
EDITORIAL: With Ammunition Scarce Can Reloading Supplies Be Next?
3/09/2013
Diane Feinstein Questions Sanity of Military Vets To Own Firearms
Posted by Brian
Ah, the mind of the totalitarian statist. Senator Diane Feinstein, in response to an amendment to her bill to ban firearms, managed to insult every American veteran who has served.
Sen. John Cornyn proposed an amendment to her bill that would add retired veterans to the list of individuals exempt from her ban. What followed next was not only despicable, but by any measure, showed her total lack of knowledge of those who serve in the military.
Feinstein responded to Cornyn with this:
(Video Below)
H/T to The Black Sphere
Senate Hearing: Sen. Feinstein's remarks on retired members of the military begin at about the 1:34:50 mark.
Ah, the mind of the totalitarian statist. Senator Diane Feinstein, in response to an amendment to her bill to ban firearms, managed to insult every American veteran who has served.
Sen. John Cornyn proposed an amendment to her bill that would add retired veterans to the list of individuals exempt from her ban. What followed next was not only despicable, but by any measure, showed her total lack of knowledge of those who serve in the military.
Feinstein responded to Cornyn with this:
(Video Below)
As I understand our bill, no issue has arose in this regard during the 10 years the expired ban was effect… and what we did in the other bill was exempt possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States… that included active military. The problem with expanding this is that you know with the advent of PTSD, which I think is a new phenomenon as a product of the Iraq War, it’s not clear how the seller or transferrer of a firearm covered by this bill would verify that an individual was a member, or a veteran, and that there was no impairment of that individual with respect to having a weapon like this. So you know I would be happy to sit down with you again and see if we could work something out but I think we have to — if you’re going to do this, find a way that veterans who are incapacitated for one reason or another mentally don’t have access to this kind of weapon.
First of all Madame Senator, PTSD is not a "new phenomenon". Military fighting men and women have exhibited "battle fatigue", and "shell shock"long before the Iraq War came about. Millions of Vietnam, Korean, and WWI/II vets have all dealt with the horrors of battle, and the vast majority have shown themselves to be more than capable of the responsibility of owning any number of different types of firearms. Moreover, I argue that veterans as a rule are more responsible and show greater restraint with firearms than those have never served, due to the fact that many have seen firsthand the consequences of pulling that trigger. Many have come back to serve as Police Officers , or in the FBI, Border Patrol, and other law enforcement capacities. Your assertion that vets coming back from battle are somehow mentally defective is not only insulting, it is irresponsible.
The event at Sandy Hook Elementary, which launched your latest crusade, was tragic. But, it was not carried out by a military vet. Nor were the following: Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Colorado, Phoenix (Gabby Giffords), Amish School House murders. The vast majority of mass shooting are committed by people who never served in the military. Furthermore, the vast majority of mass shootings in the U.S., including the one at Sandy Hook, were not committed with the so-called "assault weapons" you propose banning, but with semi-automatic handguns (LINK).
Senator Feinstein's legislation is just another attempt by those on the left to exploit a tragedy for the express purpose of subjugating the Constitutional rights of Americans. That she does it this time by denigrating the men and women who have served to defend those rights for ALL Americans, is beyond despicable.
Senator, you owe all of the men and women who have ever served this great country of ours an apology!
H/T to The Black Sphere
Senate Hearing: Sen. Feinstein's remarks on retired members of the military begin at about the 1:34:50 mark.
Related articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












