Showing posts with label gun confiscation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun confiscation. Show all posts

4/11/2013

Prescription Meds: The Left's New Path to Gun Control?

Posted by Brian

Psychotropic Drugs: An Anti-gun Statists Wet Dream!

Anti-gun hysteria has reached a fever pitch among lawmakers across the country, at both the state and federal level.  Legislation, which our so-called representatives are writing and passing, with nary any debate, is being proposed and voted on.  As posted on April 9th, the unintended consequences (or are they intended?) of the New York state anti-gun bill, misleadingly called the NYSAFE Act, is resulting in the confiscation of firearms from citizens who have done nothing wrong, save that they are on "anti-anxiety" medication.  An Attorney, Jim Tresmond, confirmed in a New York radio interview that this is indeed happening in New York. (Click here for the link to the interview)

(Connecticut's new gun legislation is expected to be even more prohibitive than New York's)

Now, before you say, "Yeah, we need to get the guns out of the hands of the mentally ill and those with mental issues!" Stick with me.  We're not talking about people who have severe mental instability, schizophrenia, or have shown documented evidence to be a threat to themselves or others. We are talking of people who have merely been prescribed psychotropic drugs used to treat any number of things, including mental disorders.  Sounds like a good thing, right?  Well, under that sweeping definition,  millions of Americans can be labeled as mentally unstable by a tyrannical government.  Under "psychotropic" are the following drugs: Ambien (a sleep aid), Antabuse (to treat alcoholism), Cymbalta (anti-depressant),Elavil (anti-depressant), Prozac, Lunesta (sleep aid), Ritalin (to treat ADHD), Valium (anti-anxiety), Xanax(anti-anxiety), and Welbutrin (smoking cessation aid), just to name a few. (For a more comprehensive list, click here)

The opportunity for the statists in the government to run roughshod over the 2nd Amendment with this is staggering.  I would venture that well over 50% of the population would qualify as mentally unstable by these standards.  Add to those, with both federal and state governments calling for universal gun registration to identify every legally owned gun in the country, the prospect that they would confiscate firearms from you even because a family member in you house currently is prescribed, or had ever been prescribed, drugs for anxiety or depression (mild or otherwise).  It would give a tyrannical government the authority to confiscate 99% of the legal firearms from the people.  Of course, the criminals would still be armed to the teeth, as I don't expect they will be rushing down to their local sheriff's office to register their weapons.

The left is on the march, and our 2nd Amendment rights have never been in more danger of being taken away.  Anyone who has the smallest interest in protecting their 2nd Amendment Rights need to speak up NOW, and get involved at ALL levels of government, as well as anyone within their circle of influence.  You have not been silenced yet, unless you refuse to speak up!
Enhanced by Zemanta

4/02/2013

***BREAKING*** Obama Admin Votes To Approve U.N. Gun Control, Void 2nd Amendment!!

Posted by Brian

While the Obama Administration is embroiled in two gun-running scandals, ("Operation Fast and Furious", and the reported smuggling of weapons from Libya to Syrian rebels, which resulted in the Benghazi Embassy attacks and the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, two Navy SEALS, and a fourth embassy person), they voted to approve the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty.

Sold as a way to regulate the sale and transport of illegal weapons between countries, the treaty is a massive power grab by the international community to regulate the rights of individuals to own or possess personal firearms.  It requires individual countries to maintain a national registry for the sale and possession of all firearms (link).

Somebody, please show me where any President has the authority to cede the sovereignty of our country and its Constitution to an international body. Particularly one made up of dictators, thugs, and despots.  This is a treasonous act by this President and this Administration, who has stated that he is "not coming for your guns", then turns around and votes to have the U.N. do just that!  His goal, along with all leftists is to disarm citizens, not only in this country, but all over the world.  The only ones left with weapons will be the governments and criminals.

So much easier to control "the masses" that way!

UN Passes Sweeping Gun Control Measure 
Tuesday, 02 Apr 2013 12:50 PM

The United Nations General Assembly on Tuesday signed off on a sweeping, first-of-its-kind treaty to regulate the international arms trade, brushing aside worries from U.S. gun rights advocates that the pact could lead to a national firearms registry and disrupt the American gun market.

The long-debated U.N. Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) requires countries to regulate and control the export of weaponry such as battle tanks, combat vehicles and aircraft and attack helicopters, as well as parts and ammunition for such weapons. It also provides that signatories will not violate arms embargoes, international treaties regarding illicit trafficking, or sell weaponry to a countries for genocide, crimes against humanity or other war crimes.

With the Obama administration supporting the final treaty draft, the General Assembly vote was 154 to 3, with 23 abstentions.
Read More at News Max


Enhanced by Zemanta

3/18/2013

California "No Rights" List: Gun Registration Leading to Confiscation

Posted by Brian

Does anyone still believe that firearms registration doesn't lead to confiscation?  California Attorney General Kamal Harris apparently believes that it not only gives her the authority, but she is putting her belief into action.
She claims that law enforcement are only confiscating firearms from those who are no longer "qualified" to own a weapon, even though they may have been purchased legally.  She claims that it is for people who have been deemed to have "lost their rights" to own firearms due to criminal convictions, restraining orders, or mental health detentions.  There are currently 19,700 Californians on the "No rights" list.  To date, 10,000 firearms have been confiscated.
Already, there is a man who had his firearms confiscated because his wife "voluntarily" had herself committed to a hospital to adjust her medications.
The program, which has already been given $24 million to implement, leaves me to wonder how many veterans who may need mental health care, make the decision not to seek treatment if doing so puts them on a permanent list which denies them the right to own firearms.
There is no word yet on what the state plans to do about the millions of illegal firearms owned by criminals and illegal immigrants once they have confiscated firearms from those who have purchased and registered their firearms legally.

California again proves that purpose of registration is confiscation
SECOND AMENDMENT MARCH 13, 2013BY: KURT HOFMANN

CA Attorney General Kamala Harris
"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible..."
For those who have not paid attention to history, and are thus unaware that the very point of any gun registration regime is the eventual confiscation of the registered, and thus conveniently pinpointed, guns, California is kindly offering another lesson.

From Bloomberg:  Wearing bulletproof vests and carrying 40-caliber Glock pistols, nine California Justice Department agents assembled outside a ranch-style house in a suburb east of Los Angeles. They were looking for a gun owner who’d recently spent two days in a mental hospital.

How did they know this individual was a gun owner?

California is the only state that tracks and disarms people with legally registered guns who have lost the right to own them, according to Attorney General Kamala Harris.

Ah, yes--Kamala Harris. We've discussed her before, regarding her advocacy of "body armor control," and her perhaps even more chilling apparent disregard for the Fourth Amendment:

The idea, she contends, is to remind legal gun owners how to behave.

"Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible and safe in the way that you conduct your affairs," Harris said.
Read more at Examiner.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/25/2013

Obama to Top Brass: Will you fire on American Citizens?

Posted by Tom

Dr. Jim Garrow, PhD, is a world renowned educator and human rights activist who was Nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009.  Dr Garrow is making a very serious accusation, one with potentially dire consequences.  He alleges that Obama is asking Top Military Officers, "Will you fire on American Citizens if ordered to do so"?


Obama has stated over the last several weeks that he will act on Gun Control, if Congress fails to take the steps he feels are necessary.  Does this mean he's considering taking action on his own, such as the forced confiscation of firearms, that would be in violation of the Constitution?  Is he attempting to ascertain the military's position if he were to issue such an order?


Dr Garrow is making a very startling accusation.  There are several points to consider.  Dr Garrow is by all accounts a very well accomplished and credible man, not many have been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.  On the other hand, he has not yet come forth with the identity of the Officer making this accusation.  Without naming the accuser, I consider this suspect.  If this is true, no doubt others would have been asked the very same question.

We will no doubt need additional corroborating evidence to know for sure, but just the fact this is being raised should be cause for concern.