Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts

2/05/2014

Communist Sheila Jackson Lee: 'We'll Give President Obama a Number of Executive Orders'

Let's call a spade a spade.  Sheila Jackson Lee, the Congressional Black caucus, some new caucus called the 'Congressional Full Employment Caucus', and a majority of House and Senate Democrats should be identified by what they truly believe, and are advocating for the country to become - Communists.

Sheila Jackson-Lee calls for lawlessness and imposing a a dictatorship

Speaking for her newly created caucus, Jackson Lee, looking like she just crawled out of bed, told reporters:
“We will be answering the call of all of America because people need work and we’re not doing right by them by creating work. I believe this caucus will put us on the right path and we’ll give President Obama a number of executive orders that he can sign with pride and strength.  In fact, I think that should be our number one agenda. Let’s write up these executive orders — draft them, of course — and ask the president to stand with us on full employment.”
In other words: "Screw the Constitution!  We don't care about it! We don't like it! We're not going to abide by it!"

Notice that she is not calling on Congress to write legislation, debate it in committee, send it to the floor for more debate, in both the House and Senate, and then vote on it.  She is calling on this new caucus to write up executive orders and to deliver them straight to the President!  These idiots are acting like something out of a Little Rascals movie where Spanky and Alfalfa call for a meeting of the he-man-woman-haters club to come up with new rules for everybody.  It's absolutely juvenile and dangerous.  She is advocating to act like some third world tribal dictatorship.                  

No longer can there be any doubt. Sheila Jackson Lee, and her comrades are out of the closet calling for lawlessness under the United States Constitution, and openly pushing the communist agenda.

"Oh, you're just being an alarmist. Nobody wants communism." 

Well, let's take a look at the 10 planks of communism, as laid out byKarl Marx in 1848.



1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes. 
Americans do these with actions such as the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution (1868), and various zoning, school & property taxes. Also the Bureau of Land Management (Zoning laws are the first step to government property ownership)

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. 
Americans know this as misapplication of the 16th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, 1913, The Social Security Act of 1936.; Joint House Resolution 192 of 1933; and various State "income" taxes. We call it "paying your fair share".

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. 
Americans call it Federal & State estate Tax (1916); or reformed Probate Laws, and limited inheritance via arbitrary inheritance tax statutes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. 
Americans call it government seizures, tax liens, Public "law" 99-570 (1986); Executive order 11490, sections 1205, 2002 which gives private land to the Department of Urban Development; the imprisonment of "terrorists" and those who speak out or write against the "government" (1997 Crime/Terrorist Bill); or the IRS confiscation of property without due process. Asset forfeiture laws are used by DEA, IRS, ATF etc...).

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly. 
Americans call it the Federal Reserve which is a privately-owned credit/debt system allowed by the Federal Reserve act of 1913. All local banks are members of the Fed system, and are regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) another privately-owned corporation. The Federal Reserve Banks issue Fiat Paper Money and practice economically destructive fractional reserve banking.

6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State. 
Americans call it the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Department of Transportation (DOT) mandated through the ICC act of 1887, the Commissions Act of 1934, The Interstate Commerce Commission established in 1938, The Federal Aviation Administration, Federal Communications Commission, and Executive orders 11490, 10999, as well as State mandated driver's licenses and Department of Transportation regulations.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. 
Americans call it corporate capacity, The Desert Entry Act and The Department of Agriculture… Thus read "controlled or subsidized" rather than "owned"… This is easily seen in these as well as the Department of Commerce and Labor, Department of Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Reclamation, Bureau of Mines, National Park Service, and the IRS control of business through corporate regulations.

8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. 
Americans call it Minimum Wage and slave labor like dealing with our Most Favored Nation trade partner; i.e. Communist China. We see it in practice via the Social Security Administration and The Department of Labor. The National debt and inflation caused by the communal bank has caused the need for a two "income" family. Woman in the workplace since the 1920's, the 19th amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, assorted Socialist Unions, affirmative action, the Federal Public Works Program and of course Executive order 11000.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country. 
Americans call it the Planning Reorganization act of 1949 , zoning (Title 17 1910-1990) and Super Corporate Farms, as well as Executive orders 11647, 11731 (ten regions) and Public "law" 89-136. These provide for forced relocations and forced sterilization programs, like in China.

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. 
Americans are being taxed to support what we call 'public' schools, but are actually "government force-tax-funded schools " Even private schools are government regulated. The purpose is to train the young to work for the communal debt system. We also call it the Department of Education, the NEA and Outcome Based "Education" . These are used so that all children can be indoctrinated and inculcated with the government propaganda, like "majority rules", and "pay your fair share". WHERE are the words "fair share" in the Constitution, Bill of Rights or the Internal Revenue Code (Title 26)?? NO WHERE is "fair share" even suggested !! The philosophical concept of "fair share" comes from the Communist maxim, "From each according to their ability, to each according to their need! This concept is pure socialism. ... America was made the greatest society by its private initiative WORK ETHIC ... Teaching ourselves and others how to "fish" to be self sufficient and produce plenty of EXTRA commodities to if so desired could be shared with others who might be "needy"... Americans have always voluntarily been the MOST generous and charitable society on the planet.

What Sheila Jackson Lee and her comrades are proposing is absolute lawlessness under our Constitution! In addition she is baldly advocating for Barack Obama to assume Dictatorial powers and engage in further lawlessness.

Make no mistake, Obama has and continues to operate lawlessly, using Executive Orders to circumvent the Constitution and Congress, unilaterally changing the law (Affordable Care Act), or refusing to enforce laws he disagrees with (immigration/border security and DOMA).

If Jackson-Lee and her comrades move forward with their agenda, all of them, up to and including the President should be forced to resign, impeached, or forcibly removed from office.

As a retired veteran, I've paid my fair share Ms. Jackson Lee, and I don't intend for you or any other communist piece of shit to destroy what I and my Brothers took an oath to defend!

Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/25/2014

Dem Strategist: Obama "needs more outlets where it’s just him talking to the American people".

Posted by Brian




Did Dem Strategist Just call For Obama To Be A Dictator?

CNN host Don Lemon, Democrat strategist Hilary Rosen, and conservative Reihan Salam discussed President Obama's failures and sinking numbers on a recent CNN segment of "Out Front".

It was a brutal segment for Rosen, as both Salam and Lemon challenged her talking points and supposed reasons for Obama's troubles.

Rosen, saying that Republicans blow Obama's words and "intentions" out of proportion, was challenged by Lemon, who said, "Isn’t the president above that? Like, you don’t punch down."

Exactly.  It's laughable that she and Obama are complaining that Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are destroying the Presidents message.  Apparently, those two outlets alone are able to drown out MSNBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, and Ed Schultz (Radio Show) combined.  It's a ridiculous statement, especially in the context of the amount of negative press and political noise that was aimed at the Bush Administration for 8 years.  How was it that Fox and Rush were not able to counter them back then.

Salam then jumps in: “The problem is that there are a lot of people, including Democratic lawmakers, including women who serve in the Obama administration who say that this is a difficult guy to work with. There are lawmakers, Democratic lawmakers, who feel as though he has just been tremendously difficult working helping them achieve their goals. It’s not just Republicans. So I have a feeling that the president sometimes wants to shift blame to other people for some of his failures as a communicator and someone who is building communications.”

It is here that Rosen suggests that Obama's problem is he can't speak to American's directly, whenever he wants to, with no one to challenge him on what he says:
“Well, I don’t think he is shifting blame. I think that what he is saying is that he needs more and more outlets where it’s just him talking to the American people.


You know, Like Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez, talking for hours to a captive audience with no one to challenge him, or to put anything he says in context. We need to just let him be the benevolent dictator he aspires to be, and we need to shup up and be good subjects. Is that about right, Hilary Rosen?

Ms Rosen might want to go back and brush up on the history of the Jewish people, and what happens when people allow exactly what she is advocating for.

Enhanced by Zemanta

1/11/2014

Iran vs. Israel: Who's Side Is Wasserman-Schultz On?

DNC Head and Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, despite her public claims of support for Israel, is submarining bipartisan efforts to place sanctions on Iran over their nuclear program.

Wasserman-Schultz is a two-faced liar, and no friend to Israel.  She sold her allegiance is to the Democrat Party, her Jewish community, and Israel long ago.

She will, of course, vehemently deny this, and ala Hillary Clinton, blame it on some right-wing conspiracy against her, as she has done in the past when she was caught lying.

That's the problem for "Little Debbie". She has been exposed as a serial liar so many times that even if she is telling the truth this time, nobody believes her.  She has shown her political ambitions trump all.

Even Israel.




Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

10/31/2013

CNN: Obama Bullying Insurance Companies Who Criticize ObamaCare

Posted by Brian

Obama might not be the best friend of Israel, but he certainly likes the tactics of the Nazi's, ruling through fear and intimidation.

On CNN's Anderson Cooper 360, correspondent Drew Griffin stated that insurance companies "fear" the White House if they speak out against ObamaCare:

"Anderson, what’s going on is behind the scenes attempt by the White House to at least keep insurers from publicly criticizing what is happening on this Affordable Care Act rollout. Basically, if you speak out, if you are quoted, you’re going to get a call from the White House, pressure to be quiet. Several sources tell me and my colleague Chris Frates that insurance executives are being told to keep quiet".

"Bob Laszewski who heads the Health Policy Strategy Associates, a consulting firm for big insurers, and an outspoken critic of ObamaCare, says he is getting calls from these executives who want him to speak out, Anderson, for them about the problems because they feel defenseless against the White House PR team. Laszewski told me today, “The White House is exerting massive pressure on the industry, including the trade associations, to keep quiet.” Sources telling us they fear White House retribution".


Enhanced by Zemanta

10/30/2013

"The Obama Potato Gun Defense" or "How To Intimidate Journalists Who Criticize My Administration"

Posted by Brian

A few months ago, CBS reporter Sharyl Attkisson had her home and work computers hacked after stories she published were critical of the Obama Administration's seeming incompetence in Benghazi.   Now, we get an even more brazen confiscation of a reporters confidential notes and files from a reporter, Audrey Hudson, who has also be critical of the Obama regime, including a full military-stye invasion of her home, in what can only be described as an attempt to intimidate the reporter while sending a clear message to other reporters who may be thinking about criticizing the increasingly thin-skinned Obama Administration.
In a pre-dawn raid on her home, Federal Agents ostensibly looking for a "potato gun", ransacked Mrs. Hudson's home. Speaking to Gretchen Carlson of Fox News [video], Mrs. Hudson said that what made her think that the raid was about more than a potato gun though, was the first thing that the Homeland Security officer asked her upon entering her home - "Are you the same Audrey Hudson who wrote all of the Federal Air Marshall stories for the Washington Times?"

Do you still wonder what tyranny looks like?


“I think they found a great way to get into my house and get a hold of my confidential notes and go through every other file in my office."
- Audrey Hudson, journalist

Federal agents' pre-dawn raid on reporter's home raises questions
By Todd Starnes Todd's American Dispatch Published October 28, 2013 FoxNews.com

Audrey Hudson’s husband had just left for work on August 6 when suddenly, her dog began barking. The nationally-known journalist walked over to the curtains and peeked outside to discover her Chesapeake Bay home was surrounded by law enforcement officers wearing full body armor.

The phone rang. It was her husband.

“I’m in the driveway,” he said. “The police are here. Open the door.”

And so began Hudson’s nightmare – held captive by armed agents of the U.S. Coast Guard, Maryland State Police and the Department of Homeland Security as they staged a pre-dawn raid in search of unregistered firearms and a “potato gun.”

But instead of taking the potato gun, agents seized unrelated government documents and notes from the former Washington Times journalist.

Agents took Hudson’s records during a search for guns and related items owned by her husband, a civilian Coast Guard employee. They also confiscated her legally registered firearms, according to court documents obtained by The Associated Press.
Continue Reading at Fox News
Enhanced by Zemanta

10/29/2013

HE LIED! Obama Knew 3 Years Ago Millions Would Lose Their Health Insurance!

Posted by Brian

All that time in 2009 that President Obama was going around the country campaigning for the Affordable Care Act, and as late as 2012 while defending it, Barack Obama told Americans “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan."  Yeah, well not so much.  It seems that Barack Obama, Jay Carney, and the rest of his "transparent" administration knew this statement was not true over three years ago.
Courtesy of SavingTheRepublic.com

Where I come from, that is called lying.
Worse, Obama and the Democrats told the American people that those who pointed out this would happen, along with a host of other really bad things about the ACA, were the ones who were lying. We were told they were engaged in fear-mongering, scaring old people, and essentially being either uninformed, or they were heartless, mean, or un-Christian.  Suddenly, godless liberals were born-again, asking "what would Jesus do?"  All of a sudden, the left embraces Jesus, claiming he is a socialist, proving the old adage that politics makes strange bedfellows.
We can certainly debate whether Jesus was a socialist or not, but there is one thing that Jesus would not do.  Jesus wouldn't lie to people to advance his agenda.
However, there is a religion which does advocate lying and deception in furtherance of their agenda and faith.  Just saying.

Obama administration knew millions could not keep their health insurance

By Lisa Myers and Hannah Rappleye, NBC News

President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.

Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC News that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by the new health care law. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”

None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date -- the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example -- the policy would not be grandfathered.

Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”
That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them.

Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” was still saying in 2012, “If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”

“This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn’t keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn’t make it either,” said  Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today.
Continue Reading at NBC News
Enhanced by Zemanta

10/17/2013

U.S. Leftists on Campus: "IDF soldiers don’t rape Palestinians because Israelis are so racist" or " All Jews Suck"

Anti-Semitism in the 21st Century: The Resurgence
Anti-Semitism in the 21st Century: The Resurgence (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Posted by Brian

Yesterday I  posted a video of college students who had gone to public school, and yet were completely ignorant of what, where, why, and when the Holocaust occurred.  Today, I am drawn to this story which exposes that anti-semitism is no longer creeping, but deluging college students with lies, hyperbole and propaganda. Today, I am just a little bit more clear of why we are seeing a pre-WWII Nazi Germany mentality toward Israel and the Jewish people in more and more corners of the globe, including the United States.

It must be emotionally draining to be a leftist.  Common sense, rational thought, and the ability to walk and chew gum at the same time are not required. Just raw emotion masquerading as "caring" is.

This is how sick those on the left have become:

Anti-semitic leftist academics claim that the fact that there are few, if any, rapes of Palestinian women by Israel's IDF is proof that Israeli's are racist.

This is being disseminated on US college campuses as serious thinking!  So, if I am to use their twisted logic, and claim that the fact that Arab Muslims who occupy Israel's West Bank are not averse to raping Israeli women proves they are "enlightened"?

What's even more sick is that this "theory" was not hatched in the bowels of some leftist American think tank, or on the campus of UC Berkeley. It comes from an award-winning paper from Hebrew University in Israel, produced by graduate student Tal Nitzan, under the tutelage of her PhD advisors led by Zali Gurevitch, which sought to focus on "military rapes" of Palestinian women by IDF forces.  Her thesis was driven by a false premise based on Muslim propaganda as part of their worldwide jihad. Unable to find any instances of rape by IDF forces, she twisted her brain into a pretzel to come up with her "new" theory.  The IDF were not committing atrocities by raping Muslim Arab women.  They were committing atrocities by NOT raping them.  See how that works?   Neither do I.  But to the leftist mind, it makes perfect non-sense, and those on the American anti-semitic left have picked up on it and spread it throughout the halls of academe.

This brings me to former IDF officer Hen Mazzig, who on a recent trip to United States college campuses found out first-hand of the anti-Semitism being taught at US universities, using things like the very study noted in the previous paragraph.  Mazzig, who describes himself as "very liberal",  and "a member of the leftist Zionist party, Meretz",  was "shocked" by the reception of "anti-Israel bigotry" and "hostility" at campuses in the Seattle WA,  Oregon, and (of course) Berkeley CA.


Hen Mazzig at University of Washington attending an anti-semitic Film Screening 
Sponsored by SUPER-UW (Students United for Palestinian Equal Rights) 
and Jewish Voice for Peace (Self-hating Jews listed by ADL as anti-semitic)

Such was the hatred directed at Israel, and at Mazzig himself, that it has caused him to not only reflect on and reevaluate his entire way of looking liberalism and leftists, but it actually changed him both personally and politically.  Those whom he had seen as allies in a great ideological struggle hated him and his country.  He discovered that the "new" anti-semitism no longer says it hates Jews, but simply replaces "Jew" with "Israel".

In Seattle, a professor told him and the audience that 'the Jews of Israel have no national rights and should be forced out of the country'.  Mazzig asked her where the Jewish people should go to, and she responded “I don’t care. I don’t care if they don’t have any place else to go. They should not be there.” When told that she is advocating for ethnic cleansing, both she and her brainless supporters denied it.  Also in Seattle, Mazzig was confronted by a leftist who screamed at him, “You are worse than the Nazis. You are just like the Nazi youth!”  Other anti-Israel protestors called him killer and rapist.  Another professor asked him how many rapes the IDF had committed against palestinians, to which Mazzig replied that he knew of none personally.  The professor, who was obviously well acquainted with the ridiculous Hebrew University paper mentioned previously, proudly proclaimed that Mazzig was right, because, she said, “You IDF soldiers don’t rape Palestinians because Israelis are so racist and disgusted by them that you won’t touch them.”

Shai Bernstein and Hen Mazzig speak about their experiences living in Israel and serving as Israeli soldiers.
 Photo: Trevon Johnson - trejohn12@gmail.com

Mazzig was so shocked and dismayed, not only by the treatment he received from the academic imbeciles at our universities, but more so from "how unaware the organized Jewish community is and how little they are actually doing to counter this rising anti-Semitism", that he wrote and posted an op-ed piece in the Times of Israel urging American Jews "Wake Up!"

I would agree.  Too many of my Jewish friends, both conservative and liberal, seem completely oblivious to the rising anti-semitism around them, and in fact embrace some of the "peace" groups and "inter-faith alliances" which disseminate anti-semitism in our own communities. They support the most anti-Israel administration in my memory, ignoring or brushing aside each incident of  Obama or someone in his administration snubbing, insulting, or spitting in the face of Israel and its leaders.  They fail to recognize that Obama views Israel just as he does the United States -  as a country which is,  in their minds, flawed at its very core.  He sees both of us as being illegitimate from our very founding.  To Obama and the leftists, both the U.S. and Israel are built on racism and oppression.  They don't see the freedom, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness.  They see only inequality, racism, and victims.

Every day Obama and these leftists get a little more bold, and reveal just a little bit more of what their intentions are to those who are awake and paying attention.

To those American Jews who are not fully engaged on the game that the new left in the Democrat Party is engaged in, they play a dangerous game of appeasment with those who will be more than happy to slit their throat should the time ever come. It is up to those of us who are engaged to sound the alarm and wake them up.

After reading this I urge you to read his piece and to send this to as many of your Jewish and Israel-loving friends as you can.

Enhanced by Zemanta

9/10/2013

"Cracker!" - Second Race-based Assault in two days in New York City

Posted by Brian

Bus rider’s face smashed in during ‘hate attack’

An attacker pummeled a bus passenger so hard he smashed the bones in his face after calling the victim a “cracker” in Manhattan – marking the second time in two days that people appeared to be randomly targeted in racial tirades against white people, authorities said.
Surveillance camera shot of suspect

In the latest incident, the suspect passed a 31-year-old rider on the M60 bus riding through Harlem, on West 127th Street, between Amsterdam Avenue and Morningside Drive, around 2:45 p.m., Friday, when he shouted the racial slur and punched the victim in the face, breaking his nose and eye socket, cops said.

Read More at The NY Post

9/09/2013

Ed Asner: H'wood Actors Afraid To Criticize Obama for Fear of Being Labeled as Racists

Posted by Brian

Ed Asner (L), and Mike Farrell (R) are two actors who openly oppose Obama's plans to attack Syria.  Most refuse to criticize Obama for fear of  being seen as racist.

"I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration."
Hillary Clinton - 2003 (Audio)

Once you get past the eardrum-splitting screech, Hillary Clinton is correct in the quote above.  In fact, Hillary was praised and lauded by the media and those on the left for her bravery and passion.
  
Ten years later, not only is it unpatriotic to disagree with the Obama Administration, you are now a racist for doing so.  

Our first black President, whom all said was ushering in a new era of post-partisan and post-racial politics, is not only "not" to be debated or challenged on anything, but never to be criticized.  To do so is to anathema to being a member of the Ku Klux Klan.  There is no criticism to be tolerated of Barack Hussein Obama, and guys like Chris Matthews are there to point out how all critics of Obama are racist.

Therefore, it will be interesting to see how guys like Matthews treat Ed Asner's claim (see story below) that the Hollywood anti-war left are fearful of coming out against Obama on attacking Syria, for fear of being attacked by the media and this administration as racists. So all of these idiots on the left, like Janeane Garafolo, who was a leading voice of calling any criticism of Obama racist, are now afraid to criticize Obama for fear of being seen as racist.

Obama's sycophants have twisted themselves into such pretzels in defending him against any criticism, even that which is deserved, that they have now succeeded in silencing themselves.

Related Stories:
Ed Asner Explains Hollywood Silence on Obama, Syria: They 'Don't Want to Feel Anti-Black'
Highball with Chris Matthews: Criticizing Obama is Unconstitutional and Racist!

No Surprise. MSNBC's Race-Baiter Toure' Founded Anti-White Newspaper at Emory University


Enhanced by Zemanta

8/23/2013

Limbaugh Living Rent-Free In Obama's Head, Blames Rush for Problems

Posted by Brian
Barack Obama claims that it is Republicans who are afraid of Limbaugh, but why is it that it is he who always brings Limbaugh's name up? One the one hand, Limbaugh is "just an entertainer that no one pays attention to, and on the other it is Rush Limbaugh who is soooo influential that Obama can't get anything done. With Limbaugh occupying so much of Obama's brain, you'd think that "the Messiah" would be getting smarter by the second.
It's extemely funny how Obama likes to claim that he doesn't even think about Limbaugh, but never fails to blame him when things are going south for him.  Me thinks that Obama doth protest too much, or to quote 'Ace Ventura': "Obsess much?"

Rush Limbaugh (on right) is the tenant in Barack Obama's head.

Obama on CNN: Congress Has Two Jobs, But Too ‘Worried About’ ‘Rush Limbaugh’ to Do Them 
by Noah Rothman | 7:59 am, August 23rd, 2013

In an exclusive interview with CNN’s Chris Cuomo on Friday, President Barack Obama said that the upcoming fight over the continuation of a resolution which will fund the government does not have to be a fight at all. He said that enough Republicans in Congress agree that seeking to defund the Affordable Care Act is a bad idea, but they are afraid of angering their base or of conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh.
Continue Reading at Mediaite


Enhanced by Zemanta

7/10/2013

Can America Fall From Within? [Video]

Posted by Brian

This is a "Full movie" low-res version of "Agenda: Grinding America Down" and will only be available to view for a short time.
Please watch, then go to http://agendadocumentary.com/ to order copies for you, your friends, pastors, and others.  Cost is only $18 and bulk discounts are available, with discounts beginning at 2 copies.


Related:
Think You Know Obama? Bet You Didn't Know This!

6/18/2013

Making Us Less Safe - Obama Admin Allowing Women SEAL's/Rangers by 2015

Posted by Brian

As if further proof is needed that the Obama Administration and his limp-wristed, milquetoast SecDef Chuck Hagel are intentionally weakening our military fighting force, we now get a story from the NY Daily News that there are plans to allow women into the Special Operations teams known as the Navy SEAL's and Army Rangers.

Obama with intellectual midget and SecDef Chuck Hagel
This is not only disturbing, it is an outrage!  We're not talking about your average military billets here.  These are the top 1% of the top 1%!  The mental demands are not what are at issue here.  I fully believe that any motivated woman can fire a weapon a well as her male counterparts.  But the physical demands that are placed on the men who go through the training required to qualify as SEAL's and Rangers would be considered torture by some[Watch video].  And they go through it willingly.  These men are a complete different breed both mentally and physically.

This isn't like allowing a girl to join the boys Pee Wee football team when she's 12 years old.  This is akin to lining her up across the interior line from Ndamukong Suh in the NFL.

Of course, Hagel, Obama and the boys have it all figured out.  While denying that they will lower the physical standards,  Daily news story also says that "the services are methodically reviewing and revising the standards for many jobs, including strength and stamina, in order to set minimum requirements for troops to meet regardless of their sex".

Well, that certainly sounds like they are considering lowering the standards to help women meet them! Lowering standards for any job, to "level the playing field" for anyone, is a load of crap.  Lowering them to please a bunch of politicians and women's rights activists to help seal their legacy is criminal!  This will get good men AND women killed! That's right - KILLED!

For you women, as well as you sensitive metrosexuals out there standing up for "gender equality", let me clue you in on something.  Men and women aren't equal!  Biologically we are ,and always have been, different.  We are born with different muscle mass. We think differently.  We are built differently.  This is not to say men are better than women, it is to say we are different.  To pretend differently is naive, and in cases like this, dangerous.

The really sick thing in all of this is that Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer, the NOW gang, and others will celebrate this (if it is implemented) as some sort of "victory" for women.  Pelosi, Boxer, and their ilk don't give a damn about women!  Like everything else to them, women are voting blocs and political pawns to be exploited for their own ambitions and power.

In their sick, twisted minds, if some women (and men) have to be sacrificed on the field of combat for their legacies, so be it.

Click below to Read Article
Women could train as Army Rangers and Navy SEALs within a few years, military plans show 
Enhanced by Zemanta

6/05/2013

Obama's New UN Ambassador Called For "New State of Palestine" and Placing "Mammoth" U.S. Military Force In Israel

Posted by Brian

While many are focusing on the fact that President Obama has promoted Susan Rice to head the NSA, what is just as troubling, maybe even more so, is Obama's appointment of Samantha Power to replace Rice as the new U.S.' new UN Ambassador.


Power, the radical leftist wife of Cass Sunstein, Obama's Regulatory Czar, was a key figure, along with Susan Rice, in convincing Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration to commit America's military to using force in Libya.

Oh, yeah.  She's radically anti-Israel/pro-Palestinian. Appointing Power as Ambassador to a UN body which is already anti-Israel should send a chill up the spine of every Israeli, American Jew, and those who support the democratic State of Israel.

In a 2002 interview, Powers stated:
"[W]hat we need is a willingness to put something on the line in helping the situation. Putting something on the line might mean alienating a domestic constituency of tremendous political and financial import (American Jews); it may more crucially mean sacrificing -- or investing, I think, more than sacrificing -- billions of dollars, not in servicing Israel's military, but actually investing in the new state of Palestine, in investing the billions of dollars it would probably take, also, to support what will have to be a mammoth protection force, not of the old Rwanda kind, but a meaningful military presence. Because it seems to me at this stage (and this is true of actual genocides as well, and not just major human rights abuses, which were seen there), you have to go in as if you're serious, you have to put something on the line.”  It's essential that some set of principles becomes the benchmark, rather than a deference to [leaders] who are fundamentally politically destined to destroy the lives of their own people. … I do think in that sense, both political leaders have been dreadfully irresponsible. And, unfortunately, it does require external intervention…Any intervention is going to come under fierce criticism. But we have to think about lesser evils, especially when the human stakes are becoming ever more pronounced.”




Ed Morrissey addessing this very statement in a 2008 Hot Air article, wrote:
For those who may not catch the reference, Power means the Joooooos.  And why would that alienate the Jewishcabalthatsecretlyrunseverything? For one thing, Power wants to spend billions on bolstering Palestinian military strength, instead of spending it on helping the Israelis to defend themselves. Bear in mind that this interview takes place about seven months after 9/11, when people supposedly still knew how dangerous radical Islamist groups like Hamas and al-Qaeda were. Power wanted to send them money and stop funding Israeli efforts to fight them.  Even more ridiculously, Power’s ultimate aim is to send a massive American or Western force into Israel to stop what Power apparently sees as an Israeli genocide against the Palestinians. She specifically states that the force has to be “massive”, not like a Srebrenica- or Bosnia-sized force. Why would it need to be so large? In order to neutralize the Israeli Defense Force, and protect the forces of Fatah and Hamas.

Suddenly, the appointment of Samantha Power as UN Ambassador gives a whole new perspective to two recent decisions made by the Obama Administration regarding Israel, where my first reaction was "what the hell are they thinking"?

The incidents I'm referencing are the Obama Administration's publishing of Top Secret details of an Israeli missile defense facility, which included it Top Secret location, the thickness of its walls, and right down to the type of cooling systems it employs.

The second decision which perplexed me was the supplying of F-16 fighters and Patriot missile systems to Jordan.  Ostensibly, these are to be used as short-term insurance against the Syrian conflict spilling into Jordan, but giving high tech military equipment to hostile countries around Israel does not make sense in the long-term, either for Israel or the United States.  Keep in mind that Russia still backs Assad, and sees this as a hostile move by the Obama Administration.

The appointment of Power, along with Obama's demonstrated hostility to Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu, should make Israel , the Jews and anyone who supports them feel afraid. Very afraid!
Enhanced by Zemanta