Posted by Brian
Three days ago, Dianne Feinstein wanted to be the arbiter on who she feels is and isn't a reporter, and thus protected by the first amendment. A month ago, she defended NSA spying on American citizens. Now, the reptilian Feinstein again crawls out from under her rock, wanting to limit 2nd Amendment rights for ordinary Americans. Is there anything in the Bill of Rights that she does support for average Americans?
Molon Labe Senator! Molon Labe!
Feinstein calls for new gun control laws again after Navy Yard shooting
6:19 PM 09/16/2013
California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein is renewing her call for new gun-control laws because of Monday’s deadly Navy Yard shooting. “When will enough be enough?” Feinstein said in a statement Monday evening.
“Congress must stop shirking its responsibility and resume a thoughtful debate on gun violence in this country,” she said. “We must do more to stop this endless loss of life.”
Read More at The Daily Caller
Showing posts with label Political Opportunism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Political Opportunism. Show all posts
9/16/2013
5/21/2013
Preying On The Dead: Dem Senator Blames OK Twister On GOP
Posted by Brian
I wondered how long it would take before some leftist asshat politicized the tragedy in Oklahoma!
Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (RI) took to the Senate floor to criticize Republicans about global warming.
Let me tell you something Senator. This is tornado season. It comes every year. This year it has come later then ever before. However, that is not the first thing that popped into my head as I watch it unfold on national television. What came to mind is the PEOPLE in Moore, Oklahoma and elsewhere who have lost friends, family, homes, pets, and essentially everything else. My thought was not: "how can we use the pain and suffering of these people for political gain. It takes a special kind of sick SOB for that sick crap, and you are apparently that sick SOB.
These leftist scumbags PRAY for this kind of thing so they can prey on the carcasses of the dead before they can even be buried. These political vultures are soulless pieces of human debris and deserve nothing but our contempt and derision!
I wondered how long it would take before some leftist asshat politicized the tragedy in Oklahoma!
Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (RI) took to the Senate floor to criticize Republicans about global warming.
Let me tell you something Senator. This is tornado season. It comes every year. This year it has come later then ever before. However, that is not the first thing that popped into my head as I watch it unfold on national television. What came to mind is the PEOPLE in Moore, Oklahoma and elsewhere who have lost friends, family, homes, pets, and essentially everything else. My thought was not: "how can we use the pain and suffering of these people for political gain. It takes a special kind of sick SOB for that sick crap, and you are apparently that sick SOB.
These leftist scumbags PRAY for this kind of thing so they can prey on the carcasses of the dead before they can even be buried. These political vultures are soulless pieces of human debris and deserve nothing but our contempt and derision!
Related articles
3/20/2013
Mark Levin: Reid a "Miscreant", "Lowest Of the lowlives", for politicizing Marine Deaths
Posted by Brian
MARK LEVIN SLAMS REID OVER MARINES INSULT: 'LOWEST OF THE LOW-LIVES'
Noel Sheppard
Conservative talk radio host Mark Levin on Tuesday absolutely excoriated Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) for implying on the Senate floor that the sequester was connected to the death of seven Marines at the Hawthorne, Nevada, Army depot earlier in the day. "Harry Reid, you’re the lowest of the lowlives, you know that? You really are at the bottom of the sewer" (video follows courtesy Right Scoop with partial transcript).
MARK LEVIN:
The exploitation that the left is involved in, whether it’s that mass murder in Connecticut or this, is just inconceivable to a rational human being. If Harry Reid really cared about these seven Marines, why politicize this? Why not just go to the Senate floor and talk about it, and if you want to talk about the sequester, that’s in a separate speech? The sequester had nothing to do with this. […]
Harry Reid, you’re the lowest of the lowlives, you know that? You really are at the bottom of the sewer, all the time on every issue, whether it’s accusing Mitt Romney of not filing taxes. You are just a very ill human being. And the fact that you’re the Senate Majority Leader says an awful lot about the Democrats in the Senate.
The American people deserve better than this miscreant. We do. We deserve better than this man. He’s a vicious, stupid man. Somehow out of Searchlight, Nevada, he’s acquired tens of millions of dollars as he lives on a penthouse floor on the Ritz Carlton in Washington, D.C. Somehow, somehow this low IQ, no talent, hack, backwoods politician has become the Senate Majority Leader and an extremely wealthy man.
Read More at NewsBusters
MARK LEVIN SLAMS REID OVER MARINES INSULT: 'LOWEST OF THE LOW-LIVES'Noel Sheppard
Conservative talk radio host Mark Levin on Tuesday absolutely excoriated Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) for implying on the Senate floor that the sequester was connected to the death of seven Marines at the Hawthorne, Nevada, Army depot earlier in the day. "Harry Reid, you’re the lowest of the lowlives, you know that? You really are at the bottom of the sewer" (video follows courtesy Right Scoop with partial transcript).
MARK LEVIN:
The exploitation that the left is involved in, whether it’s that mass murder in Connecticut or this, is just inconceivable to a rational human being. If Harry Reid really cared about these seven Marines, why politicize this? Why not just go to the Senate floor and talk about it, and if you want to talk about the sequester, that’s in a separate speech? The sequester had nothing to do with this. […]
Harry Reid, you’re the lowest of the lowlives, you know that? You really are at the bottom of the sewer, all the time on every issue, whether it’s accusing Mitt Romney of not filing taxes. You are just a very ill human being. And the fact that you’re the Senate Majority Leader says an awful lot about the Democrats in the Senate.
The American people deserve better than this miscreant. We do. We deserve better than this man. He’s a vicious, stupid man. Somehow out of Searchlight, Nevada, he’s acquired tens of millions of dollars as he lives on a penthouse floor on the Ritz Carlton in Washington, D.C. Somehow, somehow this low IQ, no talent, hack, backwoods politician has become the Senate Majority Leader and an extremely wealthy man.
Read More at NewsBusters
Related articles
2/21/2013
Americans' and GOP Being Played by Obama on Sequestration
The American Public is being Duped! The Sequester is the Least of Our Problems!
Everyone is all in a tizzy over the upcoming sequestration. Massive cuts to the military, border control, the FBI, federal prosecutors, transportation, education (every good liberal plan always has to be about how it hurts the children), and a host of other things are being thrown around. Make no mistake, Obama will allow the cuts to unfold, and then promptly blame the Republicans for all of it. The whole thing is political gamesmanship meant to destroy the GOP, and Obama is light years ahead of GOP leaders Boehner, Cantor, and the rest of this feckless bunch.
Keep in mind also, that we are talking about $85 Billion in so-called "cuts". This represents about 2% of the overall federal budget. It wasn't that long ago that the Federal Government was able to "find" $60 Billion overnight for Hurricane Sandy Relief, which was loaded with pork-barrel spending having nothing to do with "relief" (Link). You know? The one "Krispy Kreme" Christie squealed (Link) about like a stuck pig? But yet, they can't find $85B worth of waste in the tangled bureaucracy of D.C. to avoid these automatic cuts?
Of course, the cuts won't come from non-essential services, or those mandated by the Constitution to be the primary purpose of the Federal government. No, instead our elected officials will continue to fund things like paying senior citizens $1.2 million to play video games, so we can study their effect on them.(link) Then there is the essential service of spending $2.2 Billion a year to provide free cell phones to people, because we all know that having a cell phone has now been reclassified as a basic human right. How about $4 million to build the IRS its own TV studio? Who could oppose that essential spending? Of course, we all know that it is essential that the government provide all-expense paid trips to federal employees for conferences in Las Vegas and Hawaii at a cool million dollars a pop.
I can think of aanother quick way to save money right off of the top. How about Barack Obama cuts the number of vacations, golf trips, and other non-essential trips he takes by half. This would save $700 MILLION per year of the estimated $1.4 BILLION (link) he and his family currently cost. (In contrast, England's Royal Family cost the British $60 million a year.) He might even be able to save more if he can convince Michelle to actually ride on the same plane as him, instead of taking earlier flights when he is held up by actually performing Presidential duties. I know its a huge sacrifice for her to make, but in the interest of actually appearing that she gives a crap about the rest of the serfs around the country, this might be a nice gesture.
Of course, none of this is going to happen. The whole sequester song-and-dance act is not about coming up with budget solutions, else Harry Reid would have brought a budget to the Senate floor at least once during the last 4 years, as he is required by law to do. But, why worry about the law when the whole purpose is to create a fiscal crisis and blame it on the Republicans?
Also keep in mind that the sequester is the idea of the Obama White House, which he now blames on the GOP. (Link) Let's be clear. Obama is lying! The Washington Post, which is liberal, gives Obama "Four Pinocchio's" out of four on his claim.
Back in July of 2011, White House national economic Director Jack Sperling said that the White House proposed the idea of the sequester. It was then brought to Senate Majority Leader Reid, who it was said looked like he wanted to "throw up" when he was first told. They then explained to him that it would work because they "would design it so that half the threatened cuts would be from the Defense Department….The idea was to make all of the threatened cuts so unthinkable and onerous that the supercommittee (tasked with making additional cuts) would do its work and come up with its own deficit reduction plan".
Remember back in 2011when President Obama supported the sequester cuts? Now, on February 19, 2013, he gives a speech on how devastating they will be.
The sequestration is a political calculation, not an economic solution, perpetrated by, and being carried out by, the White House, for two years. It is a plan to corner Republicans, not to cut spending, but to allow Obama and the Democrats to continue spending at unsustainable rates (GAO analysis, not mine) for the foreseeable future. The Republican leadership, under Boehner, who moronically signed onto the plan only weeks after the original proposal, is too stupid to explain it to the American people. Furthermore, the mainstream media is complicit in furthering the propaganda from Obama and the Democrats in convincing the American people that this is a Republican plan, and that it is their fault. Worse, most Americans are completely unaware of the coming economic collapse being purposefully driven by this Administration, statist Democrats, and big government Republican leadership, because of the media's total dereliction in providing people actual facts, choosing instead to provide White House talking points in print ond on the "news" programming.
Sadly, if there is not one person, Republican or Democrat, who is willing to stand up to Obama and the White House and put a halt to his agenda and his spending, the sequestration will be nothing compared to the economic disaster that is looming in the near future.
Posted by Brian
Everyone is all in a tizzy over the upcoming sequestration. Massive cuts to the military, border control, the FBI, federal prosecutors, transportation, education (every good liberal plan always has to be about how it hurts the children), and a host of other things are being thrown around. Make no mistake, Obama will allow the cuts to unfold, and then promptly blame the Republicans for all of it. The whole thing is political gamesmanship meant to destroy the GOP, and Obama is light years ahead of GOP leaders Boehner, Cantor, and the rest of this feckless bunch.
Keep in mind also, that we are talking about $85 Billion in so-called "cuts". This represents about 2% of the overall federal budget. It wasn't that long ago that the Federal Government was able to "find" $60 Billion overnight for Hurricane Sandy Relief, which was loaded with pork-barrel spending having nothing to do with "relief" (Link). You know? The one "Krispy Kreme" Christie squealed (Link) about like a stuck pig? But yet, they can't find $85B worth of waste in the tangled bureaucracy of D.C. to avoid these automatic cuts?
Of course, the cuts won't come from non-essential services, or those mandated by the Constitution to be the primary purpose of the Federal government. No, instead our elected officials will continue to fund things like paying senior citizens $1.2 million to play video games, so we can study their effect on them.(link) Then there is the essential service of spending $2.2 Billion a year to provide free cell phones to people, because we all know that having a cell phone has now been reclassified as a basic human right. How about $4 million to build the IRS its own TV studio? Who could oppose that essential spending? Of course, we all know that it is essential that the government provide all-expense paid trips to federal employees for conferences in Las Vegas and Hawaii at a cool million dollars a pop.
I can think of aanother quick way to save money right off of the top. How about Barack Obama cuts the number of vacations, golf trips, and other non-essential trips he takes by half. This would save $700 MILLION per year of the estimated $1.4 BILLION (link) he and his family currently cost. (In contrast, England's Royal Family cost the British $60 million a year.) He might even be able to save more if he can convince Michelle to actually ride on the same plane as him, instead of taking earlier flights when he is held up by actually performing Presidential duties. I know its a huge sacrifice for her to make, but in the interest of actually appearing that she gives a crap about the rest of the serfs around the country, this might be a nice gesture.
Of course, none of this is going to happen. The whole sequester song-and-dance act is not about coming up with budget solutions, else Harry Reid would have brought a budget to the Senate floor at least once during the last 4 years, as he is required by law to do. But, why worry about the law when the whole purpose is to create a fiscal crisis and blame it on the Republicans?
Also keep in mind that the sequester is the idea of the Obama White House, which he now blames on the GOP. (Link) Let's be clear. Obama is lying! The Washington Post, which is liberal, gives Obama "Four Pinocchio's" out of four on his claim.
Back in July of 2011, White House national economic Director Jack Sperling said that the White House proposed the idea of the sequester. It was then brought to Senate Majority Leader Reid, who it was said looked like he wanted to "throw up" when he was first told. They then explained to him that it would work because they "would design it so that half the threatened cuts would be from the Defense Department….The idea was to make all of the threatened cuts so unthinkable and onerous that the supercommittee (tasked with making additional cuts) would do its work and come up with its own deficit reduction plan".
Remember back in 2011when President Obama supported the sequester cuts? Now, on February 19, 2013, he gives a speech on how devastating they will be.
The sequestration is a political calculation, not an economic solution, perpetrated by, and being carried out by, the White House, for two years. It is a plan to corner Republicans, not to cut spending, but to allow Obama and the Democrats to continue spending at unsustainable rates (GAO analysis, not mine) for the foreseeable future. The Republican leadership, under Boehner, who moronically signed onto the plan only weeks after the original proposal, is too stupid to explain it to the American people. Furthermore, the mainstream media is complicit in furthering the propaganda from Obama and the Democrats in convincing the American people that this is a Republican plan, and that it is their fault. Worse, most Americans are completely unaware of the coming economic collapse being purposefully driven by this Administration, statist Democrats, and big government Republican leadership, because of the media's total dereliction in providing people actual facts, choosing instead to provide White House talking points in print ond on the "news" programming.
Sadly, if there is not one person, Republican or Democrat, who is willing to stand up to Obama and the White House and put a halt to his agenda and his spending, the sequestration will be nothing compared to the economic disaster that is looming in the near future.
Posted by Brian
Related articles
12/17/2012
Here We Go! 2nd Amendment In Crosshairs...Again
Posted by Brian
You can practically set you're watch by it. A crazed gunman, mentally unstable or just your average run of the mill antisocial piece of s*it, shoots up a mall, school or movie theatre. It's only a matter of hours or days before every left-wing nut with a microphone is calling for banning assault weapons.
So it is with Democrat Senator's Mark Warner and Joe Manchin who are calling for exactly that. This is political opportunism at its very worst.
Never mind the fact that the gunman may or may not have even used a so-called assault weapon. In the case of the shooter in Connecticut, the guy used a pistol. That doesn't matter though. The fact that he left an assault weapon in his vehicle is reason enough for their knee-jerk reaction to every one of these kinds of attacks. It's the weapon that's at fault, not the gunman. We are supposed to try to understand the reasons behind why this person would commit such a heinous act.
Here's the reason. Are you ready for it? Because they're evil bastards. You can call it mentally unstable. Probably true. You can blame it on a less than satisfactory childhood. LOTS of people have bad childhoods. But, they don't go out and shoot up an elementary school. Many of them probably have access to weapons. But at some level, they have a religious or moral belief that prevents them from doing something like that. In fact, the thought doesn't even enter their minds.
For the individuals who do this type of thing have lost their soul, and probably a long time before they committed the act. But we as a society are now told that religion and all of its strict rules and "commandments" are so passe'. It's all a bunch of ancient superstition meant to control people. I mean, who believes in "Thou shall not murder", or"Honor thy mother and father". How about "Do not covet", for all of you who are pissed off at those who are wealthy, and want the government to redistribute some of their stuff to you? As we allow schools and the government to teach our children that there is no abberant behavior, sexual deviancy, and that those who are backwards enough to believe in a power greater than ourselves (some of us call him GOD) are somehow intolerant, and bigots. I give you 20 dead elementary school children, and eight dead adults.
It wasn't the gun that did it. It was the soulless man who valued neither his, nor anyone else's life.
Connecticut school shooting: two US Senators call for assault weapons ban
Two US Senators became the first of America's pro-gun advocates to break ranks on Monday night as they called for a ban on assault weapons in the wake of the Sandy Hook elementary school shootings.
By Peter Foster, Washington7:49PM GMT 17 Dec 2012
The two Senators – both Democrats but with "A" ratings and previous endorsements from the powerful National Rifle Association gun lobby group – both spoke out to argue publicly that the death of 20 Year 2 children was a "game-changing" moment for America's divisive gun debate.
Continue Reading
You can practically set you're watch by it. A crazed gunman, mentally unstable or just your average run of the mill antisocial piece of s*it, shoots up a mall, school or movie theatre. It's only a matter of hours or days before every left-wing nut with a microphone is calling for banning assault weapons.
So it is with Democrat Senator's Mark Warner and Joe Manchin who are calling for exactly that. This is political opportunism at its very worst.
Never mind the fact that the gunman may or may not have even used a so-called assault weapon. In the case of the shooter in Connecticut, the guy used a pistol. That doesn't matter though. The fact that he left an assault weapon in his vehicle is reason enough for their knee-jerk reaction to every one of these kinds of attacks. It's the weapon that's at fault, not the gunman. We are supposed to try to understand the reasons behind why this person would commit such a heinous act.
Here's the reason. Are you ready for it? Because they're evil bastards. You can call it mentally unstable. Probably true. You can blame it on a less than satisfactory childhood. LOTS of people have bad childhoods. But, they don't go out and shoot up an elementary school. Many of them probably have access to weapons. But at some level, they have a religious or moral belief that prevents them from doing something like that. In fact, the thought doesn't even enter their minds.
For the individuals who do this type of thing have lost their soul, and probably a long time before they committed the act. But we as a society are now told that religion and all of its strict rules and "commandments" are so passe'. It's all a bunch of ancient superstition meant to control people. I mean, who believes in "Thou shall not murder", or"Honor thy mother and father". How about "Do not covet", for all of you who are pissed off at those who are wealthy, and want the government to redistribute some of their stuff to you? As we allow schools and the government to teach our children that there is no abberant behavior, sexual deviancy, and that those who are backwards enough to believe in a power greater than ourselves (some of us call him GOD) are somehow intolerant, and bigots. I give you 20 dead elementary school children, and eight dead adults.
It wasn't the gun that did it. It was the soulless man who valued neither his, nor anyone else's life.
![]() |
| Democrat Senators, Mark Warner and Joe Manchin |
Connecticut school shooting: two US Senators call for assault weapons ban
Two US Senators became the first of America's pro-gun advocates to break ranks on Monday night as they called for a ban on assault weapons in the wake of the Sandy Hook elementary school shootings.
By Peter Foster, Washington7:49PM GMT 17 Dec 2012
The two Senators – both Democrats but with "A" ratings and previous endorsements from the powerful National Rifle Association gun lobby group – both spoke out to argue publicly that the death of 20 Year 2 children was a "game-changing" moment for America's divisive gun debate.
Continue Reading
Related articles
- Enemies of Second Amendment Will Exploit Connecticut Shooting (sgtreport.com)
- Sen. Feinstein vows to pursue ban on assault weapons (swrnn.com)
- The 2nd Amendment Is Hard to Change, as Our Founders Intended (conservativebyte.com)
- What If We Sued the NRA Out of Existence? (dissidentvoice.org)
- Ed Schultz: 'Times Change,' Stop 'Hiding Behind The Second Amendment' (mediaite.com)
- Lautenberg to revive gun control bill (politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com)
- Dem Senator: We Will Have Assault Weapons Ban Bill Day One In Next Congress (freedomoutpost.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



