Judicial Activism: NC Judge Rules "Choose Life" Plate Unconstitutional

Posted by Brian

Proposed NC "Choose Life" License Plate
Oh the horror!

America is losing the culture war.
Do you believe in family values?  Bigot!  Do you believe in Judeo-Christian values?  Racist bigot!  Are you patriotic?  Redneck cracker!  Do you support the Constitution?  Right-wing, tea-bagging, redneck cracker!!
The Courts, stacked with activist judges, no longer look to the Constitution for their rulings.  They rule based on their own personal beliefs, or on judicial decisions from some "enlightened" court in Europe. Our Constitution is so outdated.
They circumvent the will and the votes of our citizens, overturning measures and propositions passed with large majorities. They are routinely ignoring our Constitution, or twisting themselves into pretzels to looking for concocted "emanations and penumbras" hiding within the words of the Framers, and which only they have the intellect with which to decipher them for we unwashed masses.
So it is with a judge in North Carolina who has ruled that it is unconstitutional for the state to make and sell license plates with the words "Choose Life"( Shown above) on them.   His reasoning?  There isn't a plate which supports "Pro-Choice" members of the community. Well, if that is all that is stopping them, I propose a license plate designed around the illustration below.
There! All fixed!

My proposal for the NC "Pro-Choice" License plate

Judge finds NC ‘Choose Life’ plates unconstitutional 
Posted on: 10:40 am, December 10, 2012, by Joe Borlik, updated on: 11:25am, December 10, 2012

RALEIGH, N.C. – A federal judge has ruled it is unconstitutional for North Carolina to issue pro-life license plates unless the state offers similar plates supporting abortion rights.

U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox ruled on Friday that North Carolina cannot produce or distribute the “Choose Life” plate.

Related articles

• Legislating from the Bench: Pro Life Message Aborted by Federal Judge (shepherdspiehole.typepad.com)

16-year-old Behind Prayer Mural Ban Demands That a WWI and WWII Memorial Be Removed!

Posted by Brian
I seldom have to step away from my desk to keep my emotions in check, but this was one of those times.  This generation's Madelyn Murray-O'Hare manifests itself in the person of Jessica Ahlquist, the teen who was so offended by a mural which had the words "Our Heavenly Father" on it that she sued her school to have it removed, has found another religious symbol that offends her oh-so-sensitive being.

Jessica Ahlquist, the new face of atheist intolerance and the the offending mural she had removed.

The "offensive" WWI/WWII Memorial"

Apparently emboldened by her court victory awarded by a leftist, linguine-spined judge, she now is going after our veterans.  The offending symbol this time is a World War I and II Memorial which has a cross on it. Not able to see past her own prejudices, and blinded by her own hatred for anything which she perceives as "offensive", she cannot even begin to understand, or fathom the honor and bravery that is behind the men and women that memorial represents.  Regardless of what she says, her motives are rooted in one thing: Her own selfishness, wrapped in some sort of perverted idea that she is somehow noble in her quest to remove from view all thing religious. She is self-serving and narcissistic. She likes her power.  She likes the $40,000 scholarship fund set up for her by an atheist group. She likes the POWER.


The people of Cranston, Rhode Island need to stand up to this little shit, and not back down the way that the school did.  If the court rules in favor of removing this memorial, the town needs to take it all the way to the Supreme Court.  We, as a nation and a people can no longer tolerate being bullied and intimidated by atheists, or any other group, which seeks to remove and water down the faith and traditions upon which this country was built.

We have been a tolerant people. Too tolerant.  Our tolerance has put us in the situation we are in now as a country... high divorce rates, single mothers, out-of-control entitlement programs, 1.3 million abortions a year, the breakdown of the nuclear family. We are a nation in crisis.  Tolerance goes both ways, and those on the left are quick to call those they disagree with as intolerant in order to cow their opponents.  Meanwhile, they use the courts, the media, and mob tactics to advance their intolerant positions and beliefs on an overly tolerant people.  We need to meet their intolerance with intolerance!

It's time we drew  line in the sand!

TEEN ATHEIST BEHIND PRAYER MURAL BAN WANTS CONTENTIOUS WWI & WWII CROSS REMOVED

Jessica Ahlquist, the 16-year-old behind the prayer mural ban at Cranston High School West in Cranston, Rhode Island, just can’t seem to keep her name out of the news.  Months after she won her ACLU-led battle, the teenager continues to receive both attention — and threats.

While she’s been quiet over the past few weeks regarding her take on atheist demands that a WWI and WWII monument in front of a Woonsocket, Rhode Island, firehouse, be removed, she’s finally speaking out.
Continue Reading

Muslim Judge In PA Uses Sharia Law To Dismiss Assault Case Against Muslim

Posted by Brian

Sharia in Pennsylvania: Muslim admits to attacking atheist over "Zombie Muhammad"; Muslim judge dismisses case, tells atheist he'd be killed in Muslim lands

This is enforcement of Sharia in a Pennsylvania court. The attacker supposedly got off because he "is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet."

Then, Judge Mark Martin, himself a Muslim, told the atheist, Ernest Perce V.:

“Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society.

Travesty upon travesty. It should be noted that no Catholics were reported to have assaulted the atheists over "Zombie Pope." "Muslim Admits to Attacking Atheist; Muslim Judge Dismisses Case," by Al Stefanelli at Opposing Views, February 23:

Read More at Jihad Watch

Related articles

• CAIR fights for Sharia Law in Pennsylvania (creepingsharia.wordpress.com)

Prayer "In Jesus' Name" Banned In N. Carolina

The Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution has been dealt another blow by the U.S. 4th Circuit and the ACLU in North Carolina. Were they loaned a panel of judges from the ultra-liberal 9th Circuit?
The First Amendment states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
The bastardization of this clause has led to everything from removing prayer in schools, to prohibiting valedictorians from saying a prayer at high school graduations. To atheists and those wanting to remove any mention of God in any public setting, the clause ends at "establishment of religion". They conveniently omit the phrase "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof" portion of the clause. The clause was put there by the founders prohibit the federal government from establishing a state religion, not to remove any vestiges of religion from the public square. A reading of history would show that several of the original 13 states actually had "official" State religions, which the Constitution did not prohibit as it fell under "states rights". Eventually the states voluntarily removed the official state religions, but not because an activist federal court or judge ruled that they were required to, under the Constitution.
Moreover, to claim that somebody, including a priest or pastor who prays in a public forum, wuo ends a prayer with the phrase "in Jesus' name" is akin to government establishing an official religion strains the bounds of common sense.
Hopefully, the U.S. Supreme Court will have wisdom to overturn this completely backwards decision issued by the 4th Circuit.

Appeals Court Rules Against Forsyth County in Prayer Case



Posted by Brian

Florida Judge Defers To Sharia Law in Ruling

Posted by Brian

Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath

or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: 

"I, ________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice 

without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the

 rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform

all the duties incumbent upon me as ________ under the Constitution and 

laws of the United States.  So help me God.

28 USCS 453: 

Solemn Oath of Justices and Judges

For those of you who think that it can't happen in the United States, let me throw in a little reality check. A Florida Judge, hearing a case between current leaders of a mosque and former trustees of the mosque over who controls the funds in an eminent domain. The current leaders wanted the case heard in a secular civil court. The former trustees want the case decided by a sharia court. A slam dunk case for the current leaders and the judge to decide right? Well, apparently for the judge it was. He decided that the matter should be handled under sharia law! Read judges ruling here >This is the danger of liberal activist judges who rule, not based on their oath to uphold the law according to the Constitution and U.S. laws,  but on how they feel or their own personal beliefs.  This judge should not only be impeached, but disbarred.  Hopefully the people of this county in Florida will take action against this judge.

Activist judges who rule based on their own personal beliefs are the exact reason why we end up with no consistency in the courts.  I can stomach a judge who comes to a decision I disagree with when they actually use the Constitution as a guidepost to buttress their decision.  We can agree to disagree on our interpretations of what is written.  But when a judge completely ignores, or references things that are nowhere in the Constitution (as in Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas' opinion that the absolute right to privacy can be found in the "emanations and penumbras"of other Constitutional protections.).

This judge in Florida completely ignored the U.S. Constitution and laws in this decision.  As such, he has willfully violated his oath and should be removed.

Florida judge orders Muslims to follow sharia law, against their will

Posted on March 19, 2011 by creeping

Creeping
 Cruising right along, hat tip to reader sarajmt. Contact Your Elected Officials – especially if you live in Florida. via RedCounty, Florida Judge orders Muslims to follow sharia law!

In Tampa, Florida, a dispute arose over who controls the funds a mosque received in 2008 from an eminent domain proceeding.

Former trustees of the mosque are claiming in court they have the right to the funds. Current mosque leaders are disputing that claim.

READ MORE HERE--->

Related articles

• A Constitution for the United States of America or of the United States? (fauxcapitalist.com)
• And here we thought that Judges were supposed to be impartial and nonpartisan (iflizwerequeen.com)

EPA Power Grab Must Be Crushed

Hugh Hewitt

The Key New Year's Resolution: Stop the EPA

Rolling back Obamacare will be at the top of many to-do lists for 2011, but a far more significant power grab is underway at the United States Environmental Protection Agency, and blocking it should be the first priority of incoming chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Fred Upton.


The good news is that Upton agrees and has already begun planning to stop the EPA before it can begin the process of asserting effective control over every business and many millions of households in the United States.

In an op-ed Upton co-authored with Tim Phillips, president of Americans for Prosperity, in Monday's Wall Street Journal and again on my radio show yesterday, Upton promised vigorous action by his committee to halt the EPA's attempt to accomplish via backdoor regulation what the Congress could not pass in 2009 or 2010 --a global warming-inspired, job-killing array of federal rules and commands on any operation or system that emits carbon dioxide.  READ MORE HERE --->

Related articles

• Critical House Republican Takes Aim At EPA (huffingtonpost.com)
• GOP plans strategy to stymie EPA (politico.com)

The Ninth Circus Strikes Again! Deviancy Dumbed Down

Administration Shields Sexually Deviant Illegals and Supports DREAM Act
J. Christian Adams

Victor Nunez is an illegal alien from Mexico. Two years after arriving in the United States, he was convicted of petty theft for shoplifting. Then, he was convicted of a much more serious crime: He exposed himself in public. But even that wasn’t enough to have him removed from the country.


After a decade of his illegal presence, the Department of Homeland Security finally brought immigration charges to remove him from the United States. Crimes of “moral turpitude,” like exposing your genitals to children, are supposed to result in certain deportation.

The Immigration Judge denied his application, and the Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed, finding that he had two convictions for “crimes involving moral turpitude,” which under the immigration laws, makes one ineligible for the green card Nunez was seeking. Nunez was on a fast track back to Mexico.

READ MORE HERE

Related articles

• "Senators: ICE doing selective enforcement, not asking for more resources" and related posts (24ahead.com)