Showing posts with label Health Care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Health Care. Show all posts

8/08/2012

WHAT!! Romney Response To Super PAC: Woman Would Have Lived Under 'RomneyCare'

Posted by Brian

Romney Communications Director Andrea Saul
If Mitt Romney wants to win this Presidential election, they better be ready to take the damn gloves off, or this race is over.  
From Romney aide Andrea Saul, in response to the Super Pac ad which claims that Mitt Romney is responsible for a woman who died of cancer, and doesn't really care that she did, comes this:

“If people had been in Massachusetts under Gov. Romney’s healthcare plan, they would have had healthcare,”

Are you KIDDING me?!  Is this moron, Andrea Saul, trying to lose the election?

This has got to be the most impotent response that she could have given!  Granted, she said the ads were "low" and "despicable", but then she cites RomneyCare? I'm sure that the Obama people are laughing their collective asses off at this limp-wristed response to an accusation that Mitt Romney killed this woman.

These people play for keeps!  They tossed her a softball with the bases loaded, and she completely whiffed it!!

How about something like this from the Romney camp:

"These accusations are completely ridiculous, and completely defamatory.  To lay blame on Mitt Romney and Bain Capital for this tragedy is ludicrous.  The fact is, this woman had health insurance for two years after her husband was laid off, during which time she may have been diagnosed in the early stages, but chose NOT to tell her family (her husbands suspicions, not mine).  Do you want to talk about deaths?  How about Officer Brian Terry and the hundreds of Mexicans murdered due to the Obama Justice Department's "Operation Fast and Furious"?  Should Obama be held responsible for that?  How about the millions of people who have lost their jobs since Barack Obama became President, and who have lost their health insurance as a result.  How many of those people have had family members die due to lack of health insurance?  You want to talk deaths!  We're willing to have that debate!"

IT's a known fact that Obama and his surrogates are going to hit below the belt.  Hell, they won't even condemn this ad. Mitt Romney and his team need to be able to come back with their own shots that are going to take this guys head off, not lay in the corner.

If they're going to continue to respond like they just did, then just concede the election now, and save us the pain of watching the John McCain campaign, Part Two.


Mitt Romney aide cites Mass. healthcare law to criticize super-PAC ad
By Jonathan Easley - 08/08/12 12:26 PM ET

The spokeswoman was responding to an ad linking Romney to the death of a woman who couldn't afford cancer treatments.

Mitt Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul cited the Massachusetts healthcare law, which the Obama campaign has called the template for the Affordable Care Act, while attacking a controversial new super-PAC ad.
Continue Reading Here
Enhanced by Zemanta

7/30/2012

'Chicken Little' Wasserman-Schultz: Romney Will Throw Seniors Out On The Street

Posted by Brian
h/t to The Shark Tank

Never underestimate the depths to which Florida Congresswoman, and DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz will sink to in defending Obama, ObamaCare, or bashing opponents.  In the past she led a protest outside Congressman Allen West's campaign headquarters in which she has called him "anti-woman" and "misogynistic".  Never let it be said that "Little Debbie" ever lets an opportunity pass to say something really despicable about Republicans or their policies.

Such is the case virtually every time she speaks on health care.  Especially if there are senior citizens present.  Her arsenal consists of Republicans want to "kill" seniors. Republicans want to put seniors on a "path to poverty".  Her latest vile theme is that Mitt Romney health care plans would put senior citizens "out in the cold" and turn them out of nursing homes. To be fair, if this weren't a group of senior citizens, but were instead a bunch of kids at a children's hospital, or she was at an NAACP conference, her message would have accommodated her audience to scare the hell out of them at too. She is nothing, if not consistent, in her vileness.

Curious though, how she fails to mention that ObamaCare takes $818B out of Medicare Part A to help pay for ObamaCare in the first ten years.  At the twenty year mark it is $3.2 TRILLION. Just a small thing to omit.  Oh! And Medicare Part B (physicians fees) isn't spared either. That is cut nearly $500B during the first ten years, and $1.75 trillion over 20 years.  How will this affect senior citizens, dear Debbie?  Might it create a reduction in non-critical services? Of course, what is deemed to be "non-critical" will be determined, not by physicians, but by bureaucrats in Washington or some other politburo-type setting.  And of course, the doctors, who are already losing money on Medicare patients, are probably not going to like that their fees will be cut even further.  Some might even decide to retire early, leaving a shortage of doctors to deal with elderly patients.  I wonder what that will do for the quality of care for seniors?  If they're having medical problems at such an advanced age, is it really fair to them to put them through a all of the surgeries, needles, and hospital stays?  I mean, what kind of quality of life is that?  Wouldn't it be better to just let them "die with dignity"?
Of course, not all doctors will leave their practice, but there will still be a shortfall to the hospitals due to the cuts in Medicare B.  I guess they can just roll those into the premiums that the rest of the people pay for their insurance, especially the rich.  But, of course, not all people will be able to absorb these new increases.  How will the government deal with that? I guess they can always make cuts here and there to certain kinds of medications and procedures, especially for the very young and the elderly.  It really wouldn't be cost effective to spend that money on somebody who's on the downhill slide, now would it?
Now, about the very young.  If they're already having medical problems at such a tender age, is it really fair to them to put them through a life of surgeries, needles, and hospital stays?  I mean, what kind of quality of life is that?  Wouldn't it be better to just let them "die with dignity".  Plus, the amount of money that would be need to "fix" them would mean that they are using more than their fair share of 'lifetime care'.  Those selfish bastards!

Yeah.  Debbie always seems to leave out what ObamaCare is already slated to do to the Medicare plans of senior citizens.  But then again, she wouldn't want to scare them now.  Would she?



DNC Chairwoman Wasserman Schultz Instilling Fear in Seniors, Again
July 30, 2012 | Filed under: Commentary | Posted by: Javier Manjarres
By Javier Manjarres

Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz continues on with her fear-mongering and scaring of seniors in New Hampshire by stating that GOP Presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s healthcare plan would force seniors out of nursing homes and “out in the cold” if they were to elect him  president.
Continue Reading Here

4/27/2012

Pelosi Opens Her Pie Hole And Crap Falls Out...Again

Posted by Brian
She's one of the most vile, despicable persons to ever step foot into Washington, yet the deviants in San Francisco continue to reelect her time and again.

The woman who arrogantly said of the Health Care bill, "We have to pass it so you can find out what's in it", steps before the mics again to lay out lie after lie to a sympathetic press pool.  So in the tank for the Democrats, not even the slightest thought occurs to them to fact check what comes out of the mouth of the Pelosi, Reid, and Obama in Washington.  They dutifully run from the mics, and parrot the words of these charlatans.  They have zero intellectual curiosity to research if what they claim is true, no matter how outrageous the claim or accusation.

Right off the top, Pelosi goes to a favorite leftist accusation.  The GOP want to give subsidies to "Big Oil", and destroy women's access to health care. Yes, the "eeevil" oil companies. The suppliers of that product which gets us to work everyday, and heats our homes, and provides lubrication for our machinery,  The product which provides the following:

Clothing Ink
Heart Valves
Crayons
Parachutes
Telephones
Enamel
Transparent tape
Antiseptics
Vacuum bottles
Deodorant
Pantyhose
Rubbing Alcohol
Carpets
Just to name a few. (Here's a more comprehensive list)

But, how about those subsidies? An article by Gary Hufbauer in the Washington Times exposes this to be false.  The Democrats' throw around the word 'subsidy', but what the oil companies get is the same tax deductions as every other company.  Subsidy insinuates that the government is giving money to the oil companies, which is not happening.  But to a leftist like Pelosi, all money belongs to the government.  How much they let us keep is up to them.  So, following her twisted logic, any deduction that you are able to claim on your taxes is a "subsidy".  YOU should be thanking HER for letting you keep the fruits of your labor.

One of the tax deductions that the oil companies receive is a 2% deduction on refining and production, which is to help keep jobs in the United States.  With Democrats bemoaning the "outsourcing" of jobs to other countries, you would think that they would be cheerleaders for this deduction. They don't, because this isn't about jobs.  It's not even about oil. Nor is it about "women's health" or a fictional "war on women.  They demonize "Big Oil" because they are an easy target.  They make a lot of money, (though not what the Dems claim), and they provide the perfect foil to promote their class warfare agenda.  It's about power. It's about subjugation of the voters. Create straw men, no matter how ridiculous ( Obama's alligators in a moat comes to mind), convince the weak-minded to willingly give up more and more of their liberty in return for the table scraps that Pelosi, and the leftists in Congress and the White House, decide they deserve.

This is going to be a HUGE election, and we are going to see and hear more and more of this kind of insulting and infuriating rhetoric between now and November. The American people should take great umbrage that Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and scores of others in Washington and the State houses look at us a stupid, malleable dupes.  We can send them a message by sending their asses home in shame on November 6th.

Pelosi: GOP Wants ‘Subsidies for Big Oil,’ Democrats Want to ‘Prevent Breast Cancer’

By Elizabeth Harrington April 26, 2012

(CNSNews.com) -- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said women’s health care is the “old favorite target” of Republicans when it comes to budget cuts, adding that while the GOP wants “to protect subsidies for big oil,” Democrats want to “prevent breast cancer” and “immunize our children.”




2/01/2012

White House To Catholic Church: We'll Tell You What You Believe. Now Take Your Contraceptives!

Posted by Brian
WH:‘No Constitutional Rights Issue’ in Forcing Catholics to Act Against Their Faith
 By Fred Lucas January 31, 2012


(CNSNews.com) – White House Press Secretary Jay Carney says there are no “constitutional rights issues” involved in a regulation issued by the administration that requires all health-care plans in the United States to cover sterilizations and all FDA-approved contraceptives, including those that induce abortions.
Because the Catholic Church holds that sterilization, artificial contraception and abortion are morally wrong and Catholic cannot be involved in them, the regulation in combination with the Obamacare mandate that all Americans buy health insurance will force American Catholics to choose between following the federal regulation or following the teachings of their church.
More at CNS News
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/31/2012

Romney Praises Ted Kennedy At RomneyCare Bill Signing

h/t to The Mark Levin Show
Mitt Romney with Ted Kennedy behind him at RomneyCare signing ceremony

For the Mitt Romney campaign the 'elephant in the room' has always been his RomneyCare health care mandate in Massachusetts. Though Romney has today's Florida vote locked up, this issue is going to become a larger issue in some of the red states, up to and through Super Tuesday on March 6th. Rick Santorum  brilliantly, and skillfully exposed Romney's problem with RomneyCare at the last debate (see video below). Romney was unable to put up a credible defense of his plan, and eventually his defense of RomneyCare showed that it is effectively identical to ObamaCare.
Now we have even the uber-liberal Mother Jones pointing out the problem that Mitt Romney is going to have with this issue.


VIDEO: Mitt Heaps Praise on Romneycare "Parent" Ted Kennedy
The GOP front-runner is doing his best to sidestep the health care reform landmine. This video sure won't help.
—By David Corn | Wed Oct. 12, 2011 2:00 AM PDT

It's no secret that Mitt Romney has an albatross around his neck: Romneycare, the Massachusetts health care overhaul he enacted while governor of the Bay State. The plan, which included a mandate compelling state residents to obtain health insurance, was a model in part for President Barack Obama's health care reform, which is much-despised by conservatives and Republican voters.
Read More at Mother Jones



Rick Santorum Destroys Mitt Romney on RomneyCare




Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

11/14/2011

AG Holder Stonewalls Congress On Document Requests...Again

Posted by Brian
Eric Holder, the top cop in the country, is making a habit of refusing to comply with congressional requests for documents of any kind, related to any number of different investigations.  For an Administration which was going to be the "most transparent" in history, the stonewalling of requested documents, administration people who refuse to appear before Congress, and non-complianceof any number of requests is downright serial.  What do they have to hide?  This is yet another instance in which it appears that Eric Holder has perjured himself under oath in testimony to Congress.
As the top law enforcement officer in the country, this appearance of corruption, lying, and concealing or failing to turn over subpoenaed evidence should require him to resign as Attorney General as soon as possible.


DOJ Refuses Judiciary Committee’s Request for Kagan-Obamacare Documents; Holder Then Testifies He Was Unaware of Request


(CNSNews.com) - The U.S. Department of Justice is refusing to comply with a request from the House Judiciary Committee to provide the committee with documents and witness interviews that the committee believes, as Chairman Lamar Smith (R.-Texas) put it in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, would allow the panel “to properly understand any involvement by Justice Kagan in matters relating to health care legislation or litigation while she was Solicitor General.”
The committee initially made the request in a July 6 letter that Smith sent directly to Attorney General Eric Holder.
Read More and watch the Video at CNS News


Enhanced by Zemanta

4/05/2011

So, Exactly What Does Constitute Tyranny?

Fried chicken with french friesImage via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian
To paraphrase a union chant: What does tyranny look like? This is what tyranny looks like!
When others can tell you what to eat, how many calories it can have in it, and how big the portions have to be, how is this not a form of tyranny?  I don't care if this is the health department or a Fatties United (F.U.) meeting.  As an individual, you should be the one dictating what goes into your body, not some do-gooder who claims that they are just trying to "help" you.  This is also a lesson in why it is a dangerous idea when government takes over health care.  By dictating what the "right foods" are to eat, and any number of other "behaviours" that may or may not be unhealthy, the government is given a defacto license to be tyrannical. If they own your body, then they own you.
Government health care hasn't even been fully implemented, and we are seeing kind of rules that can be imposed on individuals.  When one individual, or group of individuals, can dictate to other individuals what they can eat...well, if it walks like a Marxist and talks like a Marxist...

No Fry Zone: NYC Health Dept. Bans Fried Food at Work Meals

Posted on April 5, 2011 at 10:56am by Jonathon M. Seidl
h/t to The Blaze

No French fries. Or freedom fries for that matter.

The New York City Health Department has issued new guidelines banning fried foods from its work-sponsored meals, telling employees to cut bagels and muffins in half, and saying that if cakes are served for a celebration, they can’t be coupled with cookies. According to the Health Department, it’s about being consistent.

The Daily News explains:  READ MORE HERE--->

Enhanced by Zemanta

2/16/2011

ObamaCare - Full Speed Ahead

Kathleen Sebelius speaking after her official ...Image via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian
In direct defiance of a federal court order, Kathleen Sebelius and the Obama Administration continue to both fund and implement ObamaCare.  As part of an "educational outreach", because we are just too stupid to understand how wonderful ObamaCare is, HHS would increase its budget by $15.1M, over quadrupling its current budget, while increasing staffing by just under 50%.  This works out ot over $636,000 per new hire.  Ladies and gentlemen, your Obama administration looking after your money.  The arrogance, not to mention the criminal behavior, of this bunch is unbelievable.  Combined with Obama's new $3.7T budget proposal, the answer that we are getting from this administration in regards to the message sent by the American people on November 2nd, is "Screw You! We do what we want."  Are you pissed off yet?!

HHS looks to boost messaging efforts

By Jason Millman - 02/15/11 04:34 PM ET

The Obama administration health department office tasked with selling the healthcare reform law is looking to quadruple its budget while almost doubling the size of its staff.

Under the Department of Health and Human Services’ fiscal 2012 budget request, the assistant secretary for public affairs' office would get a bump from $4.8 million to $19.9 million in fiscal 2012. Meanwhile, the office would grow from 24 to 46 full-time equivalent employees.

Almost all of the new funding would be used to improve healthcare.gov and to conduct an educational outreach campaign “designed to help Americans understand and access their benefits and information under the law,” HHS wrote in its budget justification. The efforts were funded in fiscal 2010 and 2011 under the reform law, according to the budget document.
READ MORE HERE--->



Enhanced by Zemanta

2/10/2011

Obama Administration Continues to Violate Judges Orders

Kathleen Sebelius speaking after her official ...Image via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian
Even after a Federal Judge has found the Obama Administration in Contempt of Court, this administration goes full steam ahead spending taxpayer dollars on ObamaCare, in violation of the law.  Why are members of Congress not drawing up Articles of Impeachment on all members of this administration who are willfully, and with full knowledge, violating court orders. Until, and if, a higher court overturns this decision, the healthcare law is null and void, and no taxpayer funds are to be spent in implementing one aspect of it.  The Obama Administration is arrogant, and apparently believes that they are above the laws and the courts.  Somebody needs to have the cojones to bring this lawless bunch back down to earth.

Obama Administration Continues Spending Taxpayer Money Authorized by a Law Declared Unconstitutional

Thursday, February 10, 2011 By Susan Jones

(CNSNews.com) - A federal judge in Florida recently ruled that the entire health care law is unconstitutional – a ruling Judge Roger Vinson described as “the functional equivalent of an injunction.” But that hasn't stopped the Obama administration from spending hundreds of millions of dollars authorized by the disputed law.


On Wednesday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced a $750 million investment in prevention and public health -- funded through the Prevention and Public Health Fund, which was created by the new health care law.
READ MORE HERE--->


Enhanced by Zemanta

2/07/2011

Obama Administration - Serial Violaters of the Law

Posted by Brian
February 7, 2011

The Obama Administration, in all of its arrogance, is choosing to ignore the decision passed down by a federal judge declaring ObamaCare unconstitutional and that the "entire act must be declared void" (Pg 75 and 76 of the ruling - see transcript below).  What we have is a President and an Administration choosing to willfully violate the law.  This is the second time that this administration has blatantly ignored court orders, the other being the Obama Administration's willful continuation of a deep-water drilling moratorium, in violation of a court order in that case. Yet, most of the media is silent on this, or knowingly mis-reporting the facts in both of these cases.
This bunch in the White House, along with their propagadists in the mainstream media, have gone beyond sheer arrogance and are now entering behavior that is criminal.  The President and all of his appointees took an oath to "Uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States".  When they knowingly violate that oath of office, how is that not an impeachable offense?  At what point do the people of this country say "enough is enough" and demand that this lawless Government and its officials be held accountable?
For those of you who wanted "change" from this bunch of leftists - this is what it looks like.  A government with complete disregard for laws and the Constitution of the United States.

Democrats push Obamacare despite being ruled unconstitutional

February 4th, 2011 2:47 pm PT

Although ruled unconstitutional by a federal judge, Democrats plan to continue implementating the health care law known as Obamacare.

“It is as though the Constitution doesn't matter,” Rush Limbaugh said on his Thursday radio program.

Newsbusters reports Friday that radio talk show host Mark Levin – himself an attorney - had harsh words for the Obama administration:

I said that if the administration failed to follow the law, then it was lawless. (I said that) it was violating the constitution, that this was a serious as Watergate.


... There it is on Page 75. He voided the law. It's dust. It's gone, until a higher court does something else.
READ MORE HERE--->


Full Transcript of the Court Ruling
Obama Administration in contempt of court twice
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/19/2011

Sheila Jackson Lee: Repealing Health Care Is Unconstitutional

Sheila Jackson-LeeImage via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian
How did this woman get on the Judiciary Committee?
Sheila Jackson Lee, a paragon of ignorance, makes the absurd claim that the 14th Amendment allows the Federal Government the Constitutional right to force all Americans to purchase Health Insurance.  I wonder if she even knows what the 14th Amendment is all about.
It states:

AMENDMENT XIV

Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.
Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.
Section 1.


All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

This amendment to the Constitution was part of the Reconstruction Amendments (amendments 13, 14, and 15) after the Civil War. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery, The 14th Amendment was to protect the civil right of former slaves and insured Blacks full citizenship rights.  The 15th Amendment banned racial restriction on voting, or in other words, gave Black people the right to vote.

How this moron gets guarantees of government mandated health insurance out of this is a mystery, as is her being assigned to Judiciary.  All of her arguments are completely specious.  She doesn't attempt to explain how repealing health care is Unconstitutional. The reality is - she can't.  She therefore relies on sad stories of how some people died because they did not have health care. She laments, with the help of another woman, of how many children have died ("I don't know how many, but I'm sure it's a lot") due to lack of health care. No scare tactics there.  Just typical of the Democrat playbook: If you don't have facts, blame or insinuate that the conservatives and Republicans don't care about children.

Sheila Jackson Lee is an embarrassment. The fact that we have so many of these elite ignoramus's elected to public office should alarm and shame us all.
SEE VIDEO BELOW:



Enhanced by Zemanta

Pelosi: Dems Would Have Lost More Seats Without HealthCare

Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the United States Hou...Image via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian
Pelosi, Maddow, and Weiner - The HealthCare Spin Begins Again

Universal Health Care.  The holy grail of the progressives.  Of this I am certain - the Democrats will not go down without lies, smears, and a scorched earth policy where ObamaCare is concerned.
Appearing on Rachel Maddow, Nancy Pelosi claimed that Democrats would have lost even more seats if they had not rammed ObamaCare down the throats of the American public. Maddow, in her snarky way, sets up the interview talking about some recent polls released by AP and ABC (two really non-biased organizations there) which show support for repeal fading. As I posted yesterday, recent polls have been weighted with more Democrat voters than Republican or Independents. This couldn't skew the numbers at all now, could it?  In addition, there is a great clip from Anthony Weiner, in all of his arrogance and pomposity, ranting on the floor of the House about the "Health Care Fairy".

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



Enhanced by Zemanta

1/18/2011

Not The Time For GOP To Go Wobbly On Healthcare Repeal

ST. PAUL, MN - SEPTEMBER 03:  U.S. House Minor...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Posted by Brian
Republicans Need To Stick To Their Guns On Healthcare Repeal
Despite some recent polls which show the gap narrowing between those Americans favoring repeal of health care and those who want to leave it in place, Republicans need to move forward on repeal.  There are several important reasons for bringing a repeal vote to the floor, not the least of which is that repeal was a central message in the last election.  Forget that the polls are skewed by the way the questions are worded and that they are weighted to the left with more Democrats than Republicans questioned. That is typical of a lot of these polls, which is done so that the pollster can get the results they desire. What is important is this: If the GOP were to backtrack on this less than one month after gaining the majority in the House of Representatives, voter backlash would be severe. They will go down in 2012 just as the Democrats did this year.  The GOP said they heard the voters and got the message. This is their first opportunity to prove that.

In the meantime, Democrats are using the Gabrielle Giffords shooting as a call to tone down the rhetoric, set a new tone, and to work together.  This is showing a lot of chutzpah, seeing as how the Democrats were completely uninterested in having the GOP be a part of any meaningful discussions during the health care debate, and a lot of other legislation.  This attitude remained even after the creaming they took on November 2nd, ramming through as much crap as they could during the lameduck session. The Democrats haven't had a change of heart.  They have a change of strategy. Now we need to work together, which in Democrat-speak means: Republicans need to compromise with us.

In past Congresses, that is exactly what a lot of the Republican leadership has done. Who can forget the "Gang of Fourteen", led by John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and some other "moderate" Republicans, reaching across the aisle to work with Democrats to block judges nominated by a sitting Republican President? That, to Democrats, is bipartisan cooperation. Republicans who are willing to screw their own party and principles to get invited to the Sunday Morning talk shows, be on the panel of "Face the Nation", and get invited to Washington cocktail parties.

Already we are seeing John Boehner change terms such as "job-killing" bill to "job-crushing".  My God, man! Stick to your guns! (Note: I take no responsibility for some nut who is set off by the previous sentence). By changing the term, you buy into the narrative of the left that these "incendiary" words are what caused some drugged-out leftist scumbag to shoot 19 people. It is a typical leftist tactic to place collective blame on the country when a tragedy happens.  Boehner and the rest of the GOP leadership need to completely reject these premises floated by the media, face these issues head-on, and articulate to the American public what complete sophistry these media-driven crisis are.

If Republicans backtrack on this, they will almost ensure that a third-Party will rise up, formed by Americans who are already distrustful of both Parties.

Two New Obamacare Polls Have High Numbers of Democrats, Misleading Questions
By Katrina Trinko  January 17, 2011 5:40 P.M.

Two new polls show declining support for fully repealing Obamacare. Does this mean the GOP, on the verge of passing a bill repealing Obamacare in the House, should back down?

Not so, say GOP pollsters, who argue that the poll questions are poorly worded and that the demographic samples include a disproportionate number of Democrats.
READ MORE HERE-->



Enhanced by Zemanta

1/14/2011

Obama Goes Back On Tax Pledge!

Barack Obama signing the Patient Protection an...Image via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian
ObamaCare taxes unearned income 3.8% in 2013‏

Posted on January 11, 2011 by Hix
h/t to the Hix Fix

Dear Friends;

Another provision hidden in the details of the 2000+ pages of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010 is now starting to make headlines as economists are increasingly concerned about the possibility of a second recessionary dip because the real estate market is not rebounding. Guess how Pelosi, Reid, and Obama decided they could help cover the cost of their ObamaCare debacle? Starting in 2013 we will be taxes 3.8% on all unearned income. This includes the sale of all forms of real estate and, in fact, any income other than that generated from sources other than employment!

Definition: Unearned income – income derived from sources other than employment, such as interest and dividends from investments, or income from rental property. Also called unearned revenue. opposite of earned income.  READ MORE HERE--->
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/03/2011

The New "N-Word": Obamacare

Monday, January 03, 2011

Oops, your Liberal Partisanship is showing

The healthcare reform act, I think this is what Charles wants to somehow denigrate and personalize as Obamacare. That becomes sort of a partisan attack slogan, let’s call it what it is–Mark Shields, PBS

The Liberal echo chamber is in full effect as it attempts to protect “Obamacare” from anyone who would attempt to repeal it, namely the 112th Congress. Oh, did I say Obamacare? It seems that Liberals on PBS, CNN and all other Liberal propaganda News networks have secretly gotten together and decided that the word Obamacare is the new political N-word for anyone who uses it.
READ MORE HERE--->





Enhanced by Zemanta

12/31/2010

SHHH! Don't Tell Anyone, But Death Panels Are Back.

Physicians will be given financial incentives to encourage elderly Medicare patients to enter end-of-life "counselling" ("Do you really want to burden your family with your condition?"). This is something that some physicians now do with seriously ill patients.  My problem with this is when this discussion is brought up because the physician is going to get a financial kickback for doing so.  My question would be: Am I having drugs and procedures withheld due to their expense, and being told how I am being a burden to my loved ones because it's for my own good, or because my physician is getting more money from the system for doing so?  At what point will this start to corrupt some of those in the medical community to ignore their Hippocratic Oath?  Such a slippery slope.  - Brian
Obama can't pass laws -- so he rewrites the rules: The new era of governing by regulation
Charles Krauthammer Friday, December 31st 2010, 4:00 AM

Most people don't remember Obamacare's notorious Section 1233, mandating government payments for end-of-life counseling. It aroused so much anxiety as a possible first slippery step on the road to state-mandated late-life rationing that the Senate never included it in the final health care law.

Well, it's back - by administrative fiat. A month ago, Medicare issued a regulation providing for end-of-life counseling during annual "wellness" visits. It was all nicely buried amid the simultaneous release of hundreds of new Medicare rules.

Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., author of Section 1233, was delighted. "Mr. Blumenauer's office celebrated 'a quiet victory,' but urged supporters not to crow about it," reports The New York Times. Deathly quiet. In early November, his office sent an e-mail plea to supporters: "We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists . . . e-mails can too easily be forwarded." They had been lucky that "thus far, it seems that no press or blogs have discovered it. . . . The longer this (regulation) goes unnoticed, the better our chances of keeping it."
READ MORE HERE--->

Enhanced by Zemanta

12/27/2010

ObamaCare Will Include Health Care 'Rationing'

Return of the Death Panel

Every part of the Obama Administration is lying to you.
by John Hayward
12/26/2010

The New York Times ran a fascinating Christmas Day story online, to appear in today's print edition, about the return of the “death panels” for ObamaCare. The term comes from a famous Sarah Palin Facebook post from 2009, in which she said:


“The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s ‘death panel’ so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society,’ whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.”
READ MORE HERE

Enhanced by Zemanta

12/14/2010

Pelosi: Are You Serious?

Nancy PelosiImage via Wikipedia
Now that a FederalJudge has ruled that the Obamacare plan violates the Commerce Clause in the Constitution, this exchange between a CNS reporter and Nancy Pelosi sheds ever more light on the arrogance of the soon-to-be ex-Speaker of the House.

FLASHBACK: When Asked Where the Constitution Authorizes Congress to Order Americans To Buy Health Insurance, Pelosi Says: 'Are You Serious?'

CNSNews.com originally published this story in which House Speaker Nancy Pelosi dismissed the question of whether Obamacare was constitutional on Oct. 22, 2009.
Monday, December 13, 2010
By Matt Cover

(CNSNews.com) - When CNSNews.com asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday where the Constitution authorized Congress to order Americans to buy health insurance--a mandate included in both the House and Senate versions of the health care bill--Pelosi dismissed the question by saying: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”
READ MORE HERE

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/checker.aspx?v=GdSU2GZu8z


Enhanced by Zemanta

12/13/2010

Nikki Haley to Obama: "Give Us Our Money Back"

Friday, Dec. 03, 2010
Obama, Haley go head to head
By James Rosen - Washington Bureau


WASHINGTON -- Gov.-elect Nikki Haley challenged President Obama over his landmark health insurance law Thursday in a candid, personal exchange in front of Cabinet members and newly elected governors from across the country but away from reporters.

In an exchange recounted by Haley and confirmed by White House aides, Obama rejected Haley's request to repeal the health care bill - but said he'd consider letting states opt out of its mandates if they ran exchange programs, banned insurance firms from denying coverage of pre-existing conditions and enabled people to pool together for better rates.

With only four Democratic incoming governors joining 18 Republicans and one independent, Obama acknowledged the Nov. 2 elections hadn't gone as he'd hoped.
READ MORE HERE
Enhanced by Zemanta