Time to Rise Up and make our voices heard this election
Did you catch the blatant racism in this video?
Nascar Driver Blake Koch says:
Over half of all race fans didn't bother to vote in the last election. I know I was one of them. It is time for all of us, the entire NASCAR nation to rise up and make our voices heard this election. Please text USA to 41600 and join Rise Up and Register today. When you sign up, you become eligible to win this car. If you do win I'll deliver it myself.
How much more racist can you get? Everybody knows that most Nascar fans are a bunch of racist, toothless, beer drinking rednecks. So it only follows that calling on the "Nascar nation" to "rise up", that Blake Koch is saying that we need to get the "black guy" out of office, right?
ESPN is saying that it has to do with religious "undertones" on Blake Koch's website, yet I don't hear him mention anything about his website, nor is there any smallprint in the ad which would direct you to his site. So I am left to wonder - what is the real reason that ESPN refuses to air this Get-out-the-vote ad?
Maybe I'm not so far off in my twisted little brain as one might think. Could it be that ESPN management is in the tank for Obama? If so, what might their line of thinking be? Probably the same as most other liberal elites:
Nascar fans are mostly conservative. Worse, they're rednecks.
Conservative = RACIST
Barack Obama is black
Racist rednecks won't vote for Obama
This ad targets Nascar fans (racist rednecks)
Conclusion: This ad is racist.
Or, it could be that they're anti-Christian, and most Nascar fans are conservative Christians (also racists and rednecks). Which brings me back to my original conclusion.
Since ESPN won't run this, I will. Be sure to share this through e-mail, Facebook, Twitter, or other social sites. And don't forget to to text USA to 41600. Maybe you'll win the car.
Posted by Brian
3/30/2012
3/29/2012
Hey MSNBC, Democrats Were the Defenders of Slavery & Hateful Policies, Not The GOP
More great insight from Alfonzo Rachel
AlfonZo Rachel looks at the recent allegations of MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell regarding Republicans. Zo thinks that O'Donnell is just playing a shell game with words, and that he ignores the fact that Democrats were the defenders of slavery and segregation. Think the Democrats were the leaders of the Suffragette movement? Think again.
See more at http://www.pjtv.com
Posted by Brian
AlfonZo Rachel looks at the recent allegations of MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell regarding Republicans. Zo thinks that O'Donnell is just playing a shell game with words, and that he ignores the fact that Democrats were the defenders of slavery and segregation. Think the Democrats were the leaders of the Suffragette movement? Think again.
See more at http://www.pjtv.com
Posted by Brian
Why Is CNN Trying To Protect Obama?
CNN's Soledad O'Brien went out of her way to defend President Obama's relationship with Critical Race Theory professor Derek Bell. Why is CNN trying to protect Obama? Find out.
See more at http://www.pjtv.com
Posted by Brian
CNN’s Soledad O’Brien has a major ratings problem
Black Genocide: The Democrats Institutionalized Racism
AlfonZo discusses "Maafa 21" and history of the abortion movement as it relates to the black community. He also warns against being an independent as it lacks any moral standards, especially when it comes to abortion.
See more at http://www.pjtv.com
Posted by Brian
Trayvon Martin: Fanning Racial Flames Of Hatred Compilation
Posted by Brian
This is a compilation of just a few examples of the hateful, incendiary language and actions being thrown around by politicians, celebrities, and groups like the New Black Panthers, who are advocating race riots, vigilantism, and rushing to judgement.
Keep in mind that this whole debacle started when the mainstream media glommed onto, and manufactured this as a white-on-black profiling assassination/murder. The political opportunists have created a wildfire, but it was the MSM who started the fire.
DUNCE: SPIKE LEE TWEETED WRONG ADDRESS TO ZIMMERMAN’S HOME
REPORT: NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY ISSUES ‘WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE’ POSTER FOR GEORGE ZIMMERMAN
FARRAKHAN TWEETS: ‘WHERE THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE WILL BE NO PEACE…LAW OF RETALIATION MAY…BE APPLIED’
ROSEANNE TWEETS ADDRESS OF ZIMMERMAN'S PARENTS - UPDATE: BARR THREATENS TO GO TO HOUSE
CONGRESSWOMAN Maxine Waters: MARTIN CASE 'HATE CRIME'
'Kill Zimmerman' Twitter account launched
This is a compilation of just a few examples of the hateful, incendiary language and actions being thrown around by politicians, celebrities, and groups like the New Black Panthers, who are advocating race riots, vigilantism, and rushing to judgement.
Keep in mind that this whole debacle started when the mainstream media glommed onto, and manufactured this as a white-on-black profiling assassination/murder. The political opportunists have created a wildfire, but it was the MSM who started the fire.
DUNCE: SPIKE LEE TWEETED WRONG ADDRESS TO ZIMMERMAN’S HOME
REPORT: NEW BLACK PANTHER PARTY ISSUES ‘WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE’ POSTER FOR GEORGE ZIMMERMAN
FARRAKHAN TWEETS: ‘WHERE THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE WILL BE NO PEACE…LAW OF RETALIATION MAY…BE APPLIED’
ROSEANNE TWEETS ADDRESS OF ZIMMERMAN'S PARENTS - UPDATE: BARR THREATENS TO GO TO HOUSE
CONGRESSWOMAN Maxine Waters: MARTIN CASE 'HATE CRIME'
'Kill Zimmerman' Twitter account launched
Trayvon "Tribute" Video: "F**K Protesting...Let's Start A Riot"
WARNING: OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE!
Story at Breitbart.com
"Tribute" Video for Trayvon Martin which essentially calls for race-riots.
Where is the President in all of this? After making a comment on the case, which essentially perpetuated the racial component of this, he has been AWOL on bounties put out by the New Black Panthers on the shooter, George Zimmerman, and members of Congress and others on the left who have helped to keep stoking the race fires. Could it be that he is supportive of this type of racial politics?
ALL BLACK IN MY HOODIE BY ZOEJA FEAT BLACK PANTHER PARTY AND MALCOLM X T...
Posted by Brian
Story at Breitbart.com
"Tribute" Video for Trayvon Martin which essentially calls for race-riots.
Where is the President in all of this? After making a comment on the case, which essentially perpetuated the racial component of this, he has been AWOL on bounties put out by the New Black Panthers on the shooter, George Zimmerman, and members of Congress and others on the left who have helped to keep stoking the race fires. Could it be that he is supportive of this type of racial politics?
ALL BLACK IN MY HOODIE BY ZOEJA FEAT BLACK PANTHER PARTY AND MALCOLM X T...
Posted by Brian
Justice Scalia: “If the government can do this, what else can it not do?"
Posted by Brian
BULLSEYE!!
(CNSNews.com) - In oral arguments in the Supreme Court this week over the constitutionality of President Barack Obama’s health care plan’s requirement that individuals must buy health insurance, Justice Antonin Scalia posed to Obama’s solicitor general a fundamental question that the mandate raises about the nature of the U.S. government.
“If the government can do this, what else can it not do?” asked Scalia.
Scalia asked the question in the context of quizzing Solicitor General Donald Verrilli on the administration’s claim that forcing people to buy health insurance is justified by the clause in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution that allows Congress to “make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers.” In this case, the administration argued that the “foregoing power” that made forcing people to buy health insurance a “necessary and proper” act of Congress was the Commerce Clause.
Read More at CNS News
BULLSEYE!!
Scalia on Obamacare Mandate: ‘If the Government Can Do This, What Else Can It Not Do?'
By Terence P. Jeffrey March 29, 2012(CNSNews.com) - In oral arguments in the Supreme Court this week over the constitutionality of President Barack Obama’s health care plan’s requirement that individuals must buy health insurance, Justice Antonin Scalia posed to Obama’s solicitor general a fundamental question that the mandate raises about the nature of the U.S. government.
“If the government can do this, what else can it not do?” asked Scalia.
Scalia asked the question in the context of quizzing Solicitor General Donald Verrilli on the administration’s claim that forcing people to buy health insurance is justified by the clause in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution that allows Congress to “make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers.” In this case, the administration argued that the “foregoing power” that made forcing people to buy health insurance a “necessary and proper” act of Congress was the Commerce Clause.
Read More at CNS News
Justice Breyer: "Of course" Government Can Force Americans To Purchase Goods/Services
Posted by Brian
What is wrong with our country? Justice Stephen Breyer gives a crystal clear illustration of what we face as a country. Breyer and his ilk have infested government, top to bottom, with this type of statist crap.
Breyer has previously said that U.S. Courts can look to foreign law in reaching decisions, just don't cite it.
Maybe I missed something, but I have thought that those in government service, whether the military, Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court take an oath to defend the Constitution. In fact, Federal judges take two oaths:
Oath 1:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (office) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.
Oath 2:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
Strange. I see nothing in either of these oaths of consulting the laws of, say France, if the U.S. Constitution doesn't address the issue before the court. No, the oath's are clear. If the issue or law before the court is not specifically addressed in the U.S. Constitution, then the Supreme Court should strike it down as unconstitutional, or send it back to the Circuit Court if it falls under a states rights issue. The 10th Amendment is also clear on this:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Stephen Breyer and his ilk are a danger to the liberty of the people of the United States. The federal government does NOT have the authority to compel individuals to purchase a specific good or service. And don't give me the argument about the "commerce clause" authorizing it. Statists have completely bastardized the original meaning of this clause with such asinine reasoning as "failure to engage in commerce is engaging in commerce", which was the argument made in the case of "Wickard vs. Filburn" in which the Court ruled that wheat that Filburn grew on his farm and fed to his cattle on his own property constituted "commerce", though the wheat never left his property, and thus didn't even fall under intrastate commerce, let alone interstate commerce. Breyer is in the camp of those who would delegate unlimited power of the federal government to regulate commerce.
Many have laughed at some of the Justices talking about forcing people to buy broccoli, cell phones and burial insurance during the hearings this week on ObamaCare, but the kind of rationale of Justice Breyer and many of his contemporaries have shown is no laughing matter.
It would give government unprecedented power over it's citizens, turning us into subjects, and mean the end of our country as we have known it.
Justice Breyer: Can Congress Make Americans Buy Computers, Cell Phones, Burials? ‘Yes, of Course’
By Terence P. Jeffrey March 28, 2012
(CNSNews.com) - During oral arguments in the Supreme Court this week, Justice Stephen Breyer posed and answered the core question at issue in the controversy over the constitutionality of Obamacare’s mandate that individual Americans must buy government-approved health insurance policies: Can Congress order individuals to buy a good or service?
“Yes, of course they could,” said Breyer.
In the history of the nation, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal government has never done this.
More at CNS News
Breyer has previously said that U.S. Courts can look to foreign law in reaching decisions, just don't cite it.
Maybe I missed something, but I have thought that those in government service, whether the military, Congress, the President, and the Supreme Court take an oath to defend the Constitution. In fact, Federal judges take two oaths:
Oath 1:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as (office) under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.
Oath 2:
I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.
Strange. I see nothing in either of these oaths of consulting the laws of, say France, if the U.S. Constitution doesn't address the issue before the court. No, the oath's are clear. If the issue or law before the court is not specifically addressed in the U.S. Constitution, then the Supreme Court should strike it down as unconstitutional, or send it back to the Circuit Court if it falls under a states rights issue. The 10th Amendment is also clear on this:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Stephen Breyer and his ilk are a danger to the liberty of the people of the United States. The federal government does NOT have the authority to compel individuals to purchase a specific good or service. And don't give me the argument about the "commerce clause" authorizing it. Statists have completely bastardized the original meaning of this clause with such asinine reasoning as "failure to engage in commerce is engaging in commerce", which was the argument made in the case of "Wickard vs. Filburn" in which the Court ruled that wheat that Filburn grew on his farm and fed to his cattle on his own property constituted "commerce", though the wheat never left his property, and thus didn't even fall under intrastate commerce, let alone interstate commerce. Breyer is in the camp of those who would delegate unlimited power of the federal government to regulate commerce.
Many have laughed at some of the Justices talking about forcing people to buy broccoli, cell phones and burial insurance during the hearings this week on ObamaCare, but the kind of rationale of Justice Breyer and many of his contemporaries have shown is no laughing matter.
It would give government unprecedented power over it's citizens, turning us into subjects, and mean the end of our country as we have known it.
Justice Breyer: Can Congress Make Americans Buy Computers, Cell Phones, Burials? ‘Yes, of Course’
By Terence P. Jeffrey March 28, 2012
(CNSNews.com) - During oral arguments in the Supreme Court this week, Justice Stephen Breyer posed and answered the core question at issue in the controversy over the constitutionality of Obamacare’s mandate that individual Americans must buy government-approved health insurance policies: Can Congress order individuals to buy a good or service?
“Yes, of course they could,” said Breyer.
In the history of the nation, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal government has never done this.
More at CNS News
3/28/2012
Obama Administration Eliminates Counter-Jihad Training
Jihad Awareness Month
(Hat Tip: Barack Obama)http://www.answeringmuslims.com/
After complaints from Muslim organizations, the Obama Administration is eliminating all counter-Jihad training in the U.S. government
More at Bare Naked Islam
Posted by Brian
France: Did Political Correctness Prevent Arrest Of Toulouse Shooter?
Posted by Brian
No Islamists Here: Media Buries Motive on Toulouse
Political correctness infests the coverage, and may have prevented the killer's earlier capture.
Why did Mohammed Merah kill three children and a teacher at the Otzar Torah school in Toulouse, France? Why did he previously kill three French soldiers in two shootings prior to Monday’s massacre? Eric Pape writes in “A Tragedy in Toulouse” (via Andrew Sullivan):
Prior to the Jewish school attack, anti-racism groups had been pointing to what they saw as the troubling xenophobic, anti-Muslim, and perhaps even anti-Semitic subtext of the presidential campaigns by the far-right National Front party as well as Sarkozy’s “respectable right” ruling party. Both have criticized Muslims — and, to a lesser extent, Jews — during the controversy over halal and kosher meat. And both have called for stark reductions in legal immigration to France. (The far right wants a 90 percent drop, while Sarkozy’s UMP has said that 50 percent is the most that is possible.) Prominent figures in both parties have amalgamated immigration and crime, despite the absence of any legitimate statistics on the matter.
The other dominant theory about the killer is that he could be a radical Islamist — whether a lone wolf inspired from afar or someone affiliated with an international power structure — who took aim at the soldiers as a message to France about its military policy abroad, and at the Jewish school to get back at Israel. There is no shortage of aspects of French foreign policy that might create enemies these days, from the ongoing French military presence in Afghanistan to the successful efforts to help overthrow Muammar al-Qaddafi in Libya to intensifying political sanctions in Iran to the Élysée’s desire for regime change in Syria.
After Toulouse Shooter ID'd As Muslim, Media Portrays Killer As Sympathetic Figure
Posted by Brian
When it was thought it might be a white neo-nazi, they condemned it. Once it was made clear the killer is muslim, the liberals begin their appeasement, using Israel’s SELF-DEFENSE against the daily dose of rockets launched by hajis in Gaza as a justification for the INTENTIONAL killing of Jewish school children.
The Toulouse killer is a Muslim terrorist so the media narrative changes again While all the media continued yesterday to assume (and indeed hope) that the Toulouse killer was a ‘white racist’ I questioned the rationality of the assumption, because it was clear to me that the attacks seemed more in keeping with Islamic terrorism. This morning we hear – surprise, surprise - that the killer is Mohammed Merah, an Islamic terrorist of Algerian origin, who claimed that the killings were in revenge for ‘Israel killing Palestinian children and for French military involvement in the Middle East.
But no sooner was this announced than the media was already spinning the story in a way to suit its own narrative again. I just watched Sky News coverage and they were stressing that the killer and his family lived in a very poor housing block surrounded by wealthier neighbours, and that clearly social deprivation and poverty were a key factor. To emphasize this narrative they then interviewed a French female journalist living in London who claimed that what was terrible about the attack was that the killer was ‘French’ and that it was therefore ‘an attack against diversity’. She said that it was all down to the racist climate in France which had been made worse by Nikolas Sarkozy in the last five years and she picked out, as an example of racist lack of tolerance, the burka ban he had introduced.
Read More at Infidels Are Cool
Now that we know the school shooter in France is muslim, the media justifies his actions
by KAL EL on MARCH 22, 2012When it was thought it might be a white neo-nazi, they condemned it. Once it was made clear the killer is muslim, the liberals begin their appeasement, using Israel’s SELF-DEFENSE against the daily dose of rockets launched by hajis in Gaza as a justification for the INTENTIONAL killing of Jewish school children.
The Toulouse killer is a Muslim terrorist so the media narrative changes again While all the media continued yesterday to assume (and indeed hope) that the Toulouse killer was a ‘white racist’ I questioned the rationality of the assumption, because it was clear to me that the attacks seemed more in keeping with Islamic terrorism. This morning we hear – surprise, surprise - that the killer is Mohammed Merah, an Islamic terrorist of Algerian origin, who claimed that the killings were in revenge for ‘Israel killing Palestinian children and for French military involvement in the Middle East.
But no sooner was this announced than the media was already spinning the story in a way to suit its own narrative again. I just watched Sky News coverage and they were stressing that the killer and his family lived in a very poor housing block surrounded by wealthier neighbours, and that clearly social deprivation and poverty were a key factor. To emphasize this narrative they then interviewed a French female journalist living in London who claimed that what was terrible about the attack was that the killer was ‘French’ and that it was therefore ‘an attack against diversity’. She said that it was all down to the racist climate in France which had been made worse by Nikolas Sarkozy in the last five years and she picked out, as an example of racist lack of tolerance, the burka ban he had introduced.
Read More at Infidels Are Cool
Have Spike Lee and America's Race Hustlers Set The Stage for Another Rodney King Riot in C. Florida?
Posted by Brian
The fact is is that Lee shouldn't have sent it out at all. He didn't "do the right thing" but instead did the dumb thing. Everyone from Lee, Al "Tawana Brawley" Sharpton, Jesse "Hymie Town" Jackson, the New Black Panthers, and the President himself have fanned the racial flames in this case. For the President, this is just another in a long line of jumping into local law enforcement cases in which he does not calm the high emotions, but further enflames them. Once a community agitator, always a community agitator.
Just as in the Duke Lacrosse Team rape case, and the Atlanta Olympic bombings, the media have created a firestorm based on little more than their own biases, and their own desire to manufacture news. In both of those cases the media got it completely wrong. The Duke players and Richard Jewell (who was labeled "the Olympic Bomber") were both completely cleared of any wrong-doing. Even after those cases, the media issued no mea culpas or did any introspection on what went wrong. It didn't matter whom had gotten hurt, or had their reputations destroyed. No, they just moved on down the road to the next big ratings getter.
To further their racial bent, they have gone as far as to label Zimmerman a "white hispanic" because of his mixed heritage. What the hell is that?! If Zimmerman had been half white and half black, would the have labeled him a "white black"? Hell no! We would not have heard of this case at all. The template is set, and the media is not going to come off of it.
As more information comes out we are finding that the actual facts of the case are not as cut and dry as the initial hysterical reporting intimated - that this was a racially motivated shooting. The truth is, we don't know what the motive was. The more information that comes out through witnesses and from the initial reports, the murkier the initial media reports become.
We have learned that Trayvon Martin was on top of Zimmerman and that it was Zimmerman that was screaming for help, and not Martin. The thing is is that the investigation is ongoing and not all the facts are out there as yet.
It may be that Zimmerman will be charged and go to court. But what if the jury finds Zimmerman not guilty. Have Spike Lee and all of these race-hustlers now set the stage for another "Rodney King Riot" for Central Florida? Will they spread across the country because of the absolute media malpractice that has been, once again, been perpetrated on the public?
Let's hope calm heads prevail
MARCH 27--With Twitter and Facebook continuing to explode with posts purporting to contain the address of George Zimmerman, property records and interviews reveal that the home is actually the longtime residence of a married Florida couple, both in their 70s, who have no connection to the man who killed Trayvon Martin and are now living in fear due to erroneous reports about their connection to the
shooter.
The mass dissemination of the address on Edgewater Circle in Sanford--the Florida city where Martin was shot to death last month--took flight last Friday when director Spike Lee retweeted a tweet containing Zimmerman’s purported address to his 240,000 followers.
Read More at The Smoking Gun
Fanning the flames of manufactured racism
Spike Lee, director of movies like "Do The Right Thing" and "Jungle Fever", jumped head first into the Trayvon Martin hysteria, retweeting the wrong address for George Zimmerman, the shooter in this whole tragedy.The fact is is that Lee shouldn't have sent it out at all. He didn't "do the right thing" but instead did the dumb thing. Everyone from Lee, Al "Tawana Brawley" Sharpton, Jesse "Hymie Town" Jackson, the New Black Panthers, and the President himself have fanned the racial flames in this case. For the President, this is just another in a long line of jumping into local law enforcement cases in which he does not calm the high emotions, but further enflames them. Once a community agitator, always a community agitator.
Just as in the Duke Lacrosse Team rape case, and the Atlanta Olympic bombings, the media have created a firestorm based on little more than their own biases, and their own desire to manufacture news. In both of those cases the media got it completely wrong. The Duke players and Richard Jewell (who was labeled "the Olympic Bomber") were both completely cleared of any wrong-doing. Even after those cases, the media issued no mea culpas or did any introspection on what went wrong. It didn't matter whom had gotten hurt, or had their reputations destroyed. No, they just moved on down the road to the next big ratings getter.
To further their racial bent, they have gone as far as to label Zimmerman a "white hispanic" because of his mixed heritage. What the hell is that?! If Zimmerman had been half white and half black, would the have labeled him a "white black"? Hell no! We would not have heard of this case at all. The template is set, and the media is not going to come off of it.
As more information comes out we are finding that the actual facts of the case are not as cut and dry as the initial hysterical reporting intimated - that this was a racially motivated shooting. The truth is, we don't know what the motive was. The more information that comes out through witnesses and from the initial reports, the murkier the initial media reports become.
We have learned that Trayvon Martin was on top of Zimmerman and that it was Zimmerman that was screaming for help, and not Martin. The thing is is that the investigation is ongoing and not all the facts are out there as yet.
It may be that Zimmerman will be charged and go to court. But what if the jury finds Zimmerman not guilty. Have Spike Lee and all of these race-hustlers now set the stage for another "Rodney King Riot" for Central Florida? Will they spread across the country because of the absolute media malpractice that has been, once again, been perpetrated on the public?
Let's hope calm heads prevail
Elderly Couple In Fear Over Spike Lee Tweet Star erroneously linked Floridians to man who killed Trayvon Martin
MARCH 27--With Twitter and Facebook continuing to explode with posts purporting to contain the address of George Zimmerman, property records and interviews reveal that the home is actually the longtime residence of a married Florida couple, both in their 70s, who have no connection to the man who killed Trayvon Martin and are now living in fear due to erroneous reports about their connection to the
shooter.
The mass dissemination of the address on Edgewater Circle in Sanford--the Florida city where Martin was shot to death last month--took flight last Friday when director Spike Lee retweeted a tweet containing Zimmerman’s purported address to his 240,000 followers.
Read More at The Smoking Gun
Labels:
Al Sharpton,
Barack Obama,
Duke Lacrosse Team,
George Zimmerman,
Jesse Jackson,
Media,
Media Malpractice,
New Black Panthers,
Racism,
Riots,
Rodney King,
Spike Lee,
Trayvon Martin,
Twitter
Another KONY 2012 SNAFU - Exec Talks Of Keeping $900K In Funds For Himself
Posted by Brian
One of the heads of Jason Russell's Invisible Children organization made a video after the charity won a $1 million grant ... in which he appears to be drunk and joking about keeping $900,000 for himself.
TMZ has obtained the clip ... featuring Jedidiah Jenkins, the Director of Ideology for the charity dedicated to hunting down African warlord Joseph Kony.
The footage appears to be shot in 2010 ... right after Invisible Children won the $1 million grand prize in the Chase Community Giving Facebook competition.
'KONY 2012' EXEC Joked About Keeping $900k Donation for Himself
One of the heads of Jason Russell's Invisible Children organization made a video after the charity won a $1 million grant ... in which he appears to be drunk and joking about keeping $900,000 for himself.
TMZ has obtained the clip ... featuring Jedidiah Jenkins, the Director of Ideology for the charity dedicated to hunting down African warlord Joseph Kony.
The footage appears to be shot in 2010 ... right after Invisible Children won the $1 million grand prize in the Chase Community Giving Facebook competition.
3/23/2012
Media Matters Fascist Campaign Against Limbaugh
Posted by Brian
Media Matters, self-proclaimed defenders of journalistic fairness, have begun a full-frontal assault on free speech. Using Rush Limbaugh as their focal point, they have begun radio ads in eight markets in an attempt to pressure local stations to drop Limbaugh from the airwaves.
By now, most have heard of Limbaugh's over the top remarks about Sandra Fluke, and the ensuing firestorm and feigned outrage from many on the left as well as some on the right. Regrettable as Rush's words were (he has since publicly apologized), the incident also exposed the abject hypocrisy of those on the left who are virtually silent when liberal hosts and entertainers make remarks that are just as, if not much more outrageous and vile than what Limbaugh uttered.
Political commentators such as Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann have made comments that are much more beyond the pale than anything Limbaugh has said. Then, there are the so-called leftists like Bill Maher, who get free passes because he is doing "comedy", when he calls Sarah Palin a "c**t" or Michelle Bachmann a "bimbo".
In these and many other instances, Media Matters remain silent. Keep in mind that Media Matters is a tax-exempt charitable organization. Yet their attacks are saved exclusively for conservative talk show hosts, the GOP and Fox News. Their blatant bias is so in-your-face that their tax-exempt status is now being challenged. We are also finding out that Media Matters has had a plan since 2009 to attempt to get Rush Limbaugh off the airwaves.
Rush Limbaugh lit the fuse that started this firestorm, but Media Matters has been standing by with the cans of gasoline for over three years to turn a small brushfire into a manufactured media inferno.
This is not just an attack on Limbaugh. This is an attack on all who value free-speech. Radio hosts, bloggers, and ordinary citizens. You may agree or disagree with Rush Limbaugh, Ed Schultz, or Keith Olbermann, but their right to voice their opinions should not be squelched by David Brock and Media Matters' Stalinist crusades.
Media Matters Launches New Ad Campaign Slamming Rush Limbaugh
Despite the media firestorm surrounding Rush Limbaugh having died down, the conservative radio host isn't off the hook just yet.
According to the Washington Times, the liberal watchdog group Media Matters has launched a $100,000 ad campaign criticizing the host for calling Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a "slut" and "prostitute" after she testified before the House on contraception.
The ads are currently being broadcast in eight cities, with some urging listeners to tell their local radio stations to take Limbaugh's show off the air and including the telephone numbers of stations broadcasting Limbaugh's show.
Media Matters, self-proclaimed defenders of journalistic fairness, have begun a full-frontal assault on free speech. Using Rush Limbaugh as their focal point, they have begun radio ads in eight markets in an attempt to pressure local stations to drop Limbaugh from the airwaves.
By now, most have heard of Limbaugh's over the top remarks about Sandra Fluke, and the ensuing firestorm and feigned outrage from many on the left as well as some on the right. Regrettable as Rush's words were (he has since publicly apologized), the incident also exposed the abject hypocrisy of those on the left who are virtually silent when liberal hosts and entertainers make remarks that are just as, if not much more outrageous and vile than what Limbaugh uttered.
Political commentators such as Ed Schultz and Keith Olbermann have made comments that are much more beyond the pale than anything Limbaugh has said. Then, there are the so-called leftists like Bill Maher, who get free passes because he is doing "comedy", when he calls Sarah Palin a "c**t" or Michelle Bachmann a "bimbo".
In these and many other instances, Media Matters remain silent. Keep in mind that Media Matters is a tax-exempt charitable organization. Yet their attacks are saved exclusively for conservative talk show hosts, the GOP and Fox News. Their blatant bias is so in-your-face that their tax-exempt status is now being challenged. We are also finding out that Media Matters has had a plan since 2009 to attempt to get Rush Limbaugh off the airwaves.
Rush Limbaugh lit the fuse that started this firestorm, but Media Matters has been standing by with the cans of gasoline for over three years to turn a small brushfire into a manufactured media inferno.
This is not just an attack on Limbaugh. This is an attack on all who value free-speech. Radio hosts, bloggers, and ordinary citizens. You may agree or disagree with Rush Limbaugh, Ed Schultz, or Keith Olbermann, but their right to voice their opinions should not be squelched by David Brock and Media Matters' Stalinist crusades.
Media Matters Launches New Ad Campaign Slamming Rush Limbaugh
Despite the media firestorm surrounding Rush Limbaugh having died down, the conservative radio host isn't off the hook just yet.
According to the Washington Times, the liberal watchdog group Media Matters has launched a $100,000 ad campaign criticizing the host for calling Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke a "slut" and "prostitute" after she testified before the House on contraception.
The ads are currently being broadcast in eight cities, with some urging listeners to tell their local radio stations to take Limbaugh's show off the air and including the telephone numbers of stations broadcasting Limbaugh's show.
Father: VA Teachers "Assignment...creepy beyond belief -- like something out of East Germany"
Posted by Brian
Virginia middle school teacher had students do 'opposition research' on GOP candidates
Published March 22, 2012 | FoxNews.comA Virginia middle school teacher is under fire after making his students do "opposition research" on Republican presidential candidates, according to a report.
Eighth-graders at Liberty Middle School in Fairfax County were assigned to research the backgrounds and positions of Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul and find any “weaknesses,” according to The Daily Caller.
President Obama’s Hall of Blame
Posted by Brian
President Obama’s Hall of Blame
by KEITH KOFFLER on MARCH 23, 2012, 9:18 AM
President Obama has passed the buck to others – mainly George W. Bush – for no less than 13 problems that characterize his presidency, suggesting time and again that his own policies are not to blame for his difficulties and he is simply doing the best that can be done with the cards he was dealt.
Even so, Obama is aggressively staking a claim for successes for which Bush shares significant or nearly all responsibility, including increased drilling for oil and natural gas, the end of the Iraq War, and the killing of Osama Bin Laden.
What follows is a roster of Obama’s efforts to assign blame for 13 problems that prevail or have faced him during his presidency. In several cases, the quotes here are just one or two of many that show Obama passing the buck on a particular issue.
Read More at White House Dossier
President Obama’s Hall of Blame
by KEITH KOFFLER on MARCH 23, 2012, 9:18 AM
President Obama has passed the buck to others – mainly George W. Bush – for no less than 13 problems that characterize his presidency, suggesting time and again that his own policies are not to blame for his difficulties and he is simply doing the best that can be done with the cards he was dealt.
Even so, Obama is aggressively staking a claim for successes for which Bush shares significant or nearly all responsibility, including increased drilling for oil and natural gas, the end of the Iraq War, and the killing of Osama Bin Laden.
What follows is a roster of Obama’s efforts to assign blame for 13 problems that prevail or have faced him during his presidency. In several cases, the quotes here are just one or two of many that show Obama passing the buck on a particular issue.
Read More at White House Dossier
Obama: The Buck Stops Everywhere But With Me
Posted by Brian
If a naval vessel has an incident which leads to damage of the ship, it's personnel, or to another vessel, the responsibility will ultimately fall on the captain of the ship. The accident could happen in the middle of the night with the captain asleep in his stateroom. No matter. Ultimate responsibility for safety of ship falls on the captain.
Not so in Obamaworld. Anything, and everything is the fault of somebody else. Bush, Congress, Bush, foreign countries, Bush, natural disasters, the rich, Bush, corporations, Bush...
According to Barack Obama, the leader of the free world, he is completely powerless regarding the economy, gas prices, unemployment, and apparently anything having to do with the Middle East and Iran's nuclear program. Imagine a CEO of a company telling his employees and shareholders that, 'yes the company is struggling, but I don't have any control over that'. That CEO would be looking for employment elsewhere.
So it should be with Barack Hussein Obama.
OBAMA ON SOLYNDRA LOAN: ‘THIS WAS NOT OUR PROGRAM’
BLAMES 'CONGRESS' AND 'THE CHINESE' FOR FIRM’S FAILURE
BY: Andrew Stiles - March 22, 2012 11:08 am
If a naval vessel has an incident which leads to damage of the ship, it's personnel, or to another vessel, the responsibility will ultimately fall on the captain of the ship. The accident could happen in the middle of the night with the captain asleep in his stateroom. No matter. Ultimate responsibility for safety of ship falls on the captain.
Not so in Obamaworld. Anything, and everything is the fault of somebody else. Bush, Congress, Bush, foreign countries, Bush, natural disasters, the rich, Bush, corporations, Bush...
According to Barack Obama, the leader of the free world, he is completely powerless regarding the economy, gas prices, unemployment, and apparently anything having to do with the Middle East and Iran's nuclear program. Imagine a CEO of a company telling his employees and shareholders that, 'yes the company is struggling, but I don't have any control over that'. That CEO would be looking for employment elsewhere.
So it should be with Barack Hussein Obama.
OBAMA ON SOLYNDRA LOAN: ‘THIS WAS NOT OUR PROGRAM’
BLAMES 'CONGRESS' AND 'THE CHINESE' FOR FIRM’S FAILURE
BY: Andrew Stiles - March 22, 2012 11:08 am
President Obama denied culpability for the failure of solar firm Solyndra in a radio interview on Tuesday, instead pinning the blame on Congress and the Chinese.
The loans initiative used to finance Solyndra was “not our program,” he told American Public Media in response to question about Solyndra’s bankruptcy and subsequent controversy.
“Understand, this was not our program per se,” Obama said. “Congress–Democrats and Republicans–put together a loan guarantee program…to help start-up companies get to scale.”
3/21/2012
Fluke Calls For Pro-Woman Litmus Test For Candidates
Posted by Brian
Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown Law student whom the left tried to pass off as just an innocent victim of a so-called, and trumped up, 'war on women', is making news again. Her first foray was, as we know, pushing for "free" birth control for all women as she testified before a congressional "committee". Committee is in quotes, because we now know that this made-for-television event wasn't really a committee meeting at all, but a bunch of congressional democrat hacks who put Ms. Fluke and a sympathetic media in the room to give the nightly news their marching orders for the evening. The result was that the media and the Democrats were able to take the issue of whether the Obama Administration's executive order that religious organizations must provide services which violate their teachings and beliefs was Constitutional, and report that this was about women's health.
We have since learned the Fluke is a left-wing ideologue with an activist past, especially where it comes to special rights for women.
She now puts herself into the public forum once again to say that there should be a litmus test for political candidates, and that litmus test is that they should be "Pro-woman". No Ms. Fluke, the litmus test for those seeking public office is that they be pro-Constitution. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights do not pander to this group, or that group. All laws which are passed by Congress should not favor any one, or several groups, at the expense of others. Sadly, we have seen an erosion of this ideal over the decades, and many politicians, both Democrat and Republican, have been corrupted by the power and money given by special interest groups.
Sadly too, as Ms. Fluke demonstrates, our law schools have become cesspools of leftist ideology which churn out such wrong-headedness as this woman demonstrates.
As such, we may see her in the future taking her place on the bench next to Sotomayor and Kagen.
Sandra Fluke: Politicians should be required to pass pro-woman litmus test to get elected
Published: 12:09 AM 03/21/2012
By Michelle Fields -- The Daily Caller
Sandra Fluke: darling of the left, whose testimony helped obfuscate the Constitutionality of Obama's mandate that religious organizations provide free contraception, into a "War On Women" |
We have since learned the Fluke is a left-wing ideologue with an activist past, especially where it comes to special rights for women.
She now puts herself into the public forum once again to say that there should be a litmus test for political candidates, and that litmus test is that they should be "Pro-woman". No Ms. Fluke, the litmus test for those seeking public office is that they be pro-Constitution. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights do not pander to this group, or that group. All laws which are passed by Congress should not favor any one, or several groups, at the expense of others. Sadly, we have seen an erosion of this ideal over the decades, and many politicians, both Democrat and Republican, have been corrupted by the power and money given by special interest groups.
Sadly too, as Ms. Fluke demonstrates, our law schools have become cesspools of leftist ideology which churn out such wrong-headedness as this woman demonstrates.
As such, we may see her in the future taking her place on the bench next to Sotomayor and Kagen.
Sandra Fluke: Politicians should be required to pass pro-woman litmus test to get elected
Published: 12:09 AM 03/21/2012
By Michelle Fields -- The Daily Caller
Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke said on Tuesday that candidates running for office should have to pass a pro-woman litmus test in order to get elected.
Click Here To Watch Video
Click Here To Watch Video
Fluke, an advocate for the Obama administration’s plan to force health insurers to cover birth control, was on Capitol Hill for a forum on “Opportunities and Challenges for a New Generation of Women,” in celebration of Women’s History Month.
Read More at The Daily Caller
Read More at The Daily Caller
3/19/2012
UK Mayoral Candidate: 'I will make London a beacon of Islam'
Posted by Brian
Ken Livingstone: I will make London a beacon of Islam
By Andrew Gilligan Politics Last updated: March 19th, 2012
Ken Livingstone has promised to turn London into a “beacon” for the words of the Prophet Mohammed in a sermon at one of the capital’s most controversial mosques.
Mr Livingstone, Labour’s candidate for mayor of London, pledged to “educate the mass of Londoners” in Islam, saying: “That will help to cement our city as a beacon that demonstrates the meaning of the words of the Prophet.” Mr Livingstone described Mohammed’s words in his last sermon as “an agenda for all humanity.”
Read More at The UK Telegraph
Ken Livingstone: I will make London a beacon of Islam
By Andrew Gilligan Politics Last updated: March 19th, 2012
Ken Livingstone has promised to turn London into a “beacon” for the words of the Prophet Mohammed in a sermon at one of the capital’s most controversial mosques.
Mr Livingstone, Labour’s candidate for mayor of London, pledged to “educate the mass of Londoners” in Islam, saying: “That will help to cement our city as a beacon that demonstrates the meaning of the words of the Prophet.” Mr Livingstone described Mohammed’s words in his last sermon as “an agenda for all humanity.”
Read More at The UK Telegraph
Romney Panders, Sells Out Conservative Principles In Puerto Rico
Posted by Brian
Romney in Puerto Rico: a case study in political pandering
Published: 4:39 PM 03/16/2012
Romney in Puerto Rico: a case study in political pandering
Published: 4:39 PM 03/16/2012
In Puerto Rico, for the price of 20 delegates, Mitt Romney sold out his conservative principles.
There is a long history of Congress requiring English to be the language of government and schools for territories seeking to be admitted to the Union — e.g., Louisiana, Arizona, New Mexico and Oklahoma. For all of the territories that had large non-English speaking populations, Congress announced before the territories voted on the question of statehood that a change in language policy would be a prerequisite for statehood. In the case of Puerto Rico, where according to the latest Census only 15% of residents are fluent in English, the English language requirement is common sense. Puerto Rico operates its government, courts and public schools in Spanish, which sets it apart from the 50 existing states.
Muslim Journalist: 'The Truth is, We Do Have A Problem In Our Muslim Community"
Posted by Brian
Muslim journalist defends surveillance by NYPD, says some Muslims 'use religion as cover'
By Catherine Herridge Published March 13, 2012 | FoxNews.com
Muslim journalist defends surveillance by NYPD, says some Muslims 'use religion as cover'
By Catherine Herridge Published March 13, 2012 | FoxNews.com
The New York Police Department has faced criticism for its surveillance of the Muslim community, but one prominent Muslim journalist defended the department in an interview with Fox News.
See video interview here
See video interview here
“We use religion as a cover,” said Asra Nomani, a 46-year-old journalist whose work has been published by the Wall Street Journal and The Daily Beast. Nomani, a native of India, says radical ideology is very real -- and damaging to all Muslims.
Read More at Fox News
Elle Macpherson: Likes Obama Because He's A 'Socialist' Just like Her
Posted by Brian
From the mouths of babes!
Supermodel Elle Macpherson Loves Obama: 'I’m Socialist - What Do You Expect?'
By Noel Sheppard | March 17, 2012 | 18:02
From the mouths of babes!
Supermodel Elle Macpherson Loves Obama: 'I’m Socialist - What Do You Expect?'
By Noel Sheppard | March 17, 2012 | 18:02
Supermodel Elle Macpherson told shock jock Howard Stern Tuesday that she's pulling for Barack Obama to be reelected.
"I’m living in London and I’m socialist," she told her host. "What do you expect?" (video follows with transcript and commentary):
Nanny Bloomberg Bans Food Donations To Homeless Shelters
Posted by Brian
No Kugel for you!
Mike’s homeless-gift ban
By JEFF STIER
Last Updated: 12:08 AM, March 19, 2012
Posted: 10:43 PM, March 18, 2012
No Kugel for you!
Mike’s homeless-gift ban
By JEFF STIER
Last Updated: 12:08 AM, March 19, 2012
Posted: 10:43 PM, March 18, 2012
So much for serving the homeless.
The Bloomberg administration is now taking the term “food police” to new depths, blocking food donations to all government-run facilities that serve the city’s homeless.
In conjunction with a mayoral task force and the Health Department, the Department of Homeless Services recently started enforcing new nutritional rules for food served at city shelters. Since DHS can’t assess the nutritional content of donated food, shelters have to turn away good Samaritans.
For over a decade, Glenn Richter and his wife, Lenore, have led a team of food-delivery volunteers from Ohab Zedek, the Upper West Side Orthodox congregation.
HHS Mandates "Free" Sterilization And Abortion-Inducing Drugs For College Age Women
Posted by Brian
Free Sterilizations Must be Offered to All College Women, Says HHS
By Terence P. Jeffrey March 17, 2012
Free Sterilizations Must be Offered to All College Women, Says HHS
By Terence P. Jeffrey March 17, 2012
(CNSNews.com) - All student health care plans covering female college students in the United States must include coverage for free voluntary sterilization surgery, the Department of Health and Human Services announced late Friday afternoon.
Women of college age who do not attend school will also get free sterilization coverage whether they are insured through an employer, their parents, or some form of government-subsidized plan.
All student health plans, HHS said Friday as it finalized a new regulation under the Affordable Care Act (otherwise known as Obamacare) must cover the full set of cost-free women’s “preventive services” that HHS ordered last month must be covered by all U.S. health care plans.
Australian children to be sterilized without parental consent under new eugenics law
Posted by Brian
Australian children to be sterilized without parental consent under new eugenics law
Ethan A. Huff Natural News March 8, 2012
Australian children to be sterilized without parental consent under new eugenics law
Ethan A. Huff Natural News March 8, 2012
(NaturalNews) If you have ever seen the famous 1975 movie One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, you likely recall several disturbing scenes in which mental health patients are given frontal-lobe lobotomies, or the iconic scene where actor Jack Nicholson’s character undergoes electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Today, these horrific forms of so-called mental health treatment are considered to be cruel relics of the past, but a new bill in Australia proposes that young children be given these treatments without parental consent, and even be permitted to undergo sterilization procedures without parental consent.
The Government of Western Australia’s Mental Health Commission (WAMHC) has basically conjured up a proposal for new mental health legislation that bypasses parental involvement in the mental health treatment process, and instead tasks children under age 18, and of any age, with making the decision about whether or not to be sterilized, or whether or not to have their brain tissue destroyed with psychosurgery procedures. If a “mental health professional” can convince children that they need such treatments for their own good, in other words, than Australia’s youngest members of society will be open game for the eugenicist agenda.
Jews Urged To Leave France _"There is no Jewish future in France"
Posted by Brian
After attack, MK calls on Jews to leave France
Ya’akov Katz says Jews’ fate cannot be left in hands of world leaders
By AARON KALMAN March 19, 2012, 2:36 pm
M K Ya’akov Katz called Monday for Jews to leave France in the wake of a deadly attack on a Jewish school in Toulouse.
“There is no Jewish future in France,” Katz, of the National Union party, said, adding that the state of Israel is the future of the Jewish people, and that Jews should not trust their fate to “Sarkozy, Obama or other world leaders.”
Read More at The Times of Israel
Related:
School Shooting: Hunt For Gunman And Motive
After attack, MK calls on Jews to leave France
Ya’akov Katz says Jews’ fate cannot be left in hands of world leaders
By AARON KALMAN March 19, 2012, 2:36 pm
Jewish child being comforted at scene of fatal shooting in Toulouse France |
“There is no Jewish future in France,” Katz, of the National Union party, said, adding that the state of Israel is the future of the Jewish people, and that Jews should not trust their fate to “Sarkozy, Obama or other world leaders.”
Read More at The Times of Israel
Related:
School Shooting: Hunt For Gunman And Motive
Obama's "Food Stamp Army's" Scheme To Stuff The 2012 Ballot Boxes For Obama
Posted by Brian
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S ATTACK ON FAIR ELECTIONS
Judicial Watch recently announced a major new campaign to stop leftist activists and their allies in the Obama administration from undermining the integrity of the elections in 2012.
As the nation heads into another presidential election season, our 2012 Election Integrity Project is one of JW’s top priorities. Our investigators have uncovered a multi-pronged strategy by leftist radicals to make certain Barack Obama and other liberal candidates are reelected by hook or by crook – with the full support and participation of the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ).
Consider this from The Washington Post:
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION'S ATTACK ON FAIR ELECTIONS
Judicial Watch recently announced a major new campaign to stop leftist activists and their allies in the Obama administration from undermining the integrity of the elections in 2012.
As the nation heads into another presidential election season, our 2012 Election Integrity Project is one of JW’s top priorities. Our investigators have uncovered a multi-pronged strategy by leftist radicals to make certain Barack Obama and other liberal candidates are reelected by hook or by crook – with the full support and participation of the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ).
Consider this from The Washington Post:
Read More At Big Government
Related:
Anti- 2nd Amendment Eric Holder - "Brainwash" Public On Guns
Posted by Brian
THE VETTING - HOLDER 1995: WE MUST 'BRAINWASH' PEOPLE ON GUNS
Breitbart.com has uncovered video from 1995 of then-U.S. Attorney Eric Holder announcing a public campaign to "really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way."
Holder was addressing the Woman's National Democratic Club. In his remarks, broadcast by CSPAN 2, he explained that he intended to use anti-smoking campaigns as his model to "change the hearts and minds of people in Washington, DC" about guns.
"What we need to do is change the way in which people think about guns, especially young people, and make it something that's not cool, that it's not acceptable, it's not hip to carry a gun anymore, in the way in which we changed our attitudes about cigarettes."
Read More At Breitbart.com
THE VETTING - HOLDER 1995: WE MUST 'BRAINWASH' PEOPLE ON GUNS
Breitbart.com has uncovered video from 1995 of then-U.S. Attorney Eric Holder announcing a public campaign to "really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way."
Holder was addressing the Woman's National Democratic Club. In his remarks, broadcast by CSPAN 2, he explained that he intended to use anti-smoking campaigns as his model to "change the hearts and minds of people in Washington, DC" about guns.
"What we need to do is change the way in which people think about guns, especially young people, and make it something that's not cool, that it's not acceptable, it's not hip to carry a gun anymore, in the way in which we changed our attitudes about cigarettes."
Read More At Breitbart.com
3/16/2012
Paul Ryan: America Deserves A Better Path
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin previews next week's FY2013 budget proposal.
You know, I was here -- in Congress -- in 2008 when we had the economic crisis. It was a terrible time. Millions of people lost their jobs. Trillions of dollars of wealth: gone.
That crisis caught us by surprise.
Let me ask you a question: what if your President, your Senator and your Congressman knew it was coming? What if they knew when it was going to happen, why it was going to happen and more importantly, what if they knew what they needed to do to stop it from happening and they had the time to stop it? But they chose to do nothing about it, because it wasn't good politics?
What would you think of that person? It would be immoral.
This coming debt crisis is the most predictable crisis we've ever had in this country. And look what's happening.
This is why we're acting. This is why we're leading. This is why we're proposing - and passing out of the House - a budget to fix this problem: so we can save our country for ourselves and our children's future.
http://budget.house.gov
http://www.facebook.com/reppaulryan
http://www/twitter.com/reppaulryan
Posted by Brian
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)