Posted by Brian
Dueling Morons
Current TV host John Fugelsang had Congressman Alan Grayson (D-FL) on to discuss the Paul Ryan budget plan on his program last night. If you can get past the condescension dripping from Fugelsang's delivery, showing that he went to the Keith Olbermann school of journalistic integrity, he eventually introduces Grayson.
Alan Grayson, who is the poster boy for outlandish statements made by Democrats, likens the overhaul of Medicare, which Obama's own number crunchers say is on an "unsustainable" path, to the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War. Fugelsang's response to this despicable comparison is an amused snort.
Grayson continues with his smears, saying that Ryan wants "people to work until they die", poor people to die, and "an America that consists of nothing but cheap labor for his corporate patrons". Karl Marx couldn't have said it better himself!
Which is worse? The communist/leftist lies and propaganda being spewed by Grayson, or this guy Fugelsang, who apparently is trying to pass himself off as a journalist, who acts like a dummy with a bad dye job, sitting on the ventriloquist Grayson's lap?
Welcome back, Congressman Grayson! I look forward to more idiocy from you in the future to illustrate the moral and intellectual bankruptcy from those of you on the Progressive/Democrat side.
Showing posts with label Paul Ryan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Ryan. Show all posts
3/14/2013
10/11/2012
Ryan Needs To Be Prepared For Biden "The Character Assassin"
Posted by Brian
H/T to Mark Levin and The American Spectator
On last night's Mark Levin Show, Mark went over a piece from The American Spectator, which serves as a reminder that the Joe Biden the media portrays, a down-to-earth, everyday, aw shucks, good old boy, is betrayed by his record of attempting to destroy personally, those whom he sees as the opposition. Not to beat them on their merits, but with vicious character assassinations.
If audio becomes available from his third hour segment, I'll update it here. For now, the American Spectator article is something which needs to be forwarded to as many people as possible to reaquaint them with the "other" Joe Biden that the media ignores.
As Levin said last night: Paul Ryan would be well advised to be prepared to deal with this "other" Joe Biden in tonight's debate: A man who is vicious, a pure ideologue, one-half of a team that is backed into a corner. And we all know what animals do when cornered.
Old Smirkin' Joe:
By PAUL KENGOR on 10.10.12 @ 6:09AM
Paul Ryan readies for the Biden Treatment.
I'd like to share a story on Senator Joe Biden that happened 31 years ago, and may be relevant to Biden's Thursday evening debate with Paul Ryan. It involved Biden's international humiliation of a good man, and it became a habit for Biden. I'm confident Biden may aim to repeat the performance with Paul Ryan in the vice-presidential debate, looking to "Quayle" the youthful Wisconsin congressman in a way worse than Lloyd Bentsen might have done.
The "good man" I'm referring to is William P. "Bill" Clark, also known as Judge Clark. Clark, now 80 years old, living in Paso Robles, California, was Ronald Reagan's confidant, closest aide, and single most important adviser in the effort to take down the Soviet Union. He was widely heralded from left to right, from the likes of Maureen Dowd to Lou Cannon to Edmund Morris to Cap Weinberger to Michael Reagan. But before Clark could do the crucial work he did for President Reagan, he had to survive confirmation hearings before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in February 1981.
Continue Reading Here
H/T to Mark Levin and The American Spectator
On last night's Mark Levin Show, Mark went over a piece from The American Spectator, which serves as a reminder that the Joe Biden the media portrays, a down-to-earth, everyday, aw shucks, good old boy, is betrayed by his record of attempting to destroy personally, those whom he sees as the opposition. Not to beat them on their merits, but with vicious character assassinations.
If audio becomes available from his third hour segment, I'll update it here. For now, the American Spectator article is something which needs to be forwarded to as many people as possible to reaquaint them with the "other" Joe Biden that the media ignores.
As Levin said last night: Paul Ryan would be well advised to be prepared to deal with this "other" Joe Biden in tonight's debate: A man who is vicious, a pure ideologue, one-half of a team that is backed into a corner. And we all know what animals do when cornered.
Old Smirkin' Joe:
By PAUL KENGOR on 10.10.12 @ 6:09AM
Paul Ryan readies for the Biden Treatment.
I'd like to share a story on Senator Joe Biden that happened 31 years ago, and may be relevant to Biden's Thursday evening debate with Paul Ryan. It involved Biden's international humiliation of a good man, and it became a habit for Biden. I'm confident Biden may aim to repeat the performance with Paul Ryan in the vice-presidential debate, looking to "Quayle" the youthful Wisconsin congressman in a way worse than Lloyd Bentsen might have done.
The "good man" I'm referring to is William P. "Bill" Clark, also known as Judge Clark. Clark, now 80 years old, living in Paso Robles, California, was Ronald Reagan's confidant, closest aide, and single most important adviser in the effort to take down the Soviet Union. He was widely heralded from left to right, from the likes of Maureen Dowd to Lou Cannon to Edmund Morris to Cap Weinberger to Michael Reagan. But before Clark could do the crucial work he did for President Reagan, he had to survive confirmation hearings before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in February 1981.
Continue Reading Here
Related articles
- Ryan: Biden Will 'Come Flying at Us' (nationalreview.com)
- Howard Fineman: 2012 COUNTDOWN: Obama Needs The Merciless Joe (huffingtonpost.com)
- Which Joe Biden will show up? (jsonline.com)
8/24/2012
Ashleigh Banfield's Manufactured Meltdown: "I'm Back Up On The Ledge Now"
Posted by Brian
Oh barf! Gag me with a spoon! Like, I'm TOTALLY not a Paul Ryan fan!
After watching this pathetic display of "journalism", ask yourself if this is the behavior of a seasoned reporter giving us the news, or that of a 16 year-old girl who isn't yet able to emotionally process her thought in a logical and cogent manner.
Pathetic and unprofessional!
CNN'S ASHLEY BANFIELD STAGES MELTDOWN TO CLAIM RYAN SOFT ON RAPE
by JOHN NOLTE 23 Aug 2012
There are two pieces of news in the clip embedded below. The first is that there actually is someone on CNN more sanctimoniously smug than Carol Costello. The second is that the media's desperation to use Missouri's Todd Akin as a wedge that claims Paul Ryan is somehow soft on rape (as opposed to strong on issues of life) is only increasing as we enter day four of this ginned up nontroversy.
If you've eaten recently, you might not want to watch this. Banfield is nauseatingly insufferable here:
Continue Reading Here
Oh barf! Gag me with a spoon! Like, I'm TOTALLY not a Paul Ryan fan!
After watching this pathetic display of "journalism", ask yourself if this is the behavior of a seasoned reporter giving us the news, or that of a 16 year-old girl who isn't yet able to emotionally process her thought in a logical and cogent manner.
Pathetic and unprofessional!
![]() |
| Ashley Banfield: "Sanctimoniously smug" |
by JOHN NOLTE 23 Aug 2012
There are two pieces of news in the clip embedded below. The first is that there actually is someone on CNN more sanctimoniously smug than Carol Costello. The second is that the media's desperation to use Missouri's Todd Akin as a wedge that claims Paul Ryan is somehow soft on rape (as opposed to strong on issues of life) is only increasing as we enter day four of this ginned up nontroversy.
If you've eaten recently, you might not want to watch this. Banfield is nauseatingly insufferable here:
Continue Reading Here
Related articles
8/17/2012
"Kick Ass" - Senior Citizens Warming To Ryan's Medicare Plan
Posted by Brian
Senior Citizens Greet Paul Ryan: ‘Good Luck! Kick Ass!’
2:43 PM, AUG 16, 2012 • BY JOHN MCCORMACK
Warren, Ohio
Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan stopped by the Original Hot Dog Shoppe here this afternoon to chat with voters and grab some lunch. The Wisconsin congressman and fitness nut chowed down on two hot dogs with onion, extra kraut and mustard, a side of small chili-cheese fries, and an unsweetened iced tea. The total bill came to $8.78, including a chili-cheese dog Ryan purchased for a reporter celebrating his twenty-seventh birthday.
"Hey Paul!" yelled an elderly woman while Ryan was placing his order with the cashier. "Good luck! Kick ass!"
Continue Reading Here
Senior Citizens Greet Paul Ryan: ‘Good Luck! Kick Ass!’
2:43 PM, AUG 16, 2012 • BY JOHN MCCORMACK
Warren, Ohio
Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan stopped by the Original Hot Dog Shoppe here this afternoon to chat with voters and grab some lunch. The Wisconsin congressman and fitness nut chowed down on two hot dogs with onion, extra kraut and mustard, a side of small chili-cheese fries, and an unsweetened iced tea. The total bill came to $8.78, including a chili-cheese dog Ryan purchased for a reporter celebrating his twenty-seventh birthday.
"Hey Paul!" yelled an elderly woman while Ryan was placing his order with the cashier. "Good luck! Kick ass!"
Continue Reading Here
Related articles
- Seniors like Paul Ryan, what's not to like? "Good luck and kick ass" (bellalu0.wordpress.com)
8/11/2012
Will "Paulinists" Give Us Four More Years Of Barack Obama?
Posted by Brian
Woke up this morning to what I had already assumed would be the "big announcement" when I went to bed. Mitt Romney has picked Rep. Paul Ryan as his Veep running mate. Not that I'm some clairvoyant, especially after it leaked that the announcement was being held in front of the USS WISCONSIN battleship. Pretty much a no-brainer.
Anyway, upon turning on the news this morning, and seeing that my hunch had been confirmed, I thought that Ryan should be a pretty solid pick for Romney. I still do. After watching him back in 2009, at the White House debt reduction meetings, in which he ran circles around everybody in the room, both Democrats and Republicans, I have watched Paul Ryan. Every time I have seen him , either in an interview or giving a speech, he is fully prepared. You can agree or disagree with his positions, but no one can accuse Paul Ryan of being ill-prepared in his debates. He is also likable. He doesn't destroy his opponents with clever sound bites or personal attacks. He beats them with irrefutable evidence to back up his points. Paul Ryan is a formidable opponent, not to be taken lightly.
The Dems and the Obama White House are saying that they are thrilled with Romney's choice, but I think that the truth is that they are scared spitless with Paul Ryan on the ticket.
This should be a winning ticket for the Republicans. But not so fast.
I have also been browsing Twitter today and the Ron Paul'ers are in an uproar. (Aren't they always?) There are a lot of thing that I like about Ron Paul and his economic policies. I think the GOP would do well to listen to him on those. In fact, some of them already may be based on the recent vote in Congress to audit the Fed. But, on a lot of other issues, I just happen to disagree. The problem with the Paul supporters is that they are like the Obama-zombies from 2008. It's more of a cult-status thing. He is this young generation's "Rocky Horror Picture Show", with a hell of a lot more on the line than dressing up, and remembering to bring toilet paper and newspapers. The selection of Paul Ryan has hit the Paulinists like holy water at an exorcism. It's not just the whining and complaining. We know they're going to do that. It's the number of them pushing for third-party votes and write-in votes.
Woke up this morning to what I had already assumed would be the "big announcement" when I went to bed. Mitt Romney has picked Rep. Paul Ryan as his Veep running mate. Not that I'm some clairvoyant, especially after it leaked that the announcement was being held in front of the USS WISCONSIN battleship. Pretty much a no-brainer.
Anyway, upon turning on the news this morning, and seeing that my hunch had been confirmed, I thought that Ryan should be a pretty solid pick for Romney. I still do. After watching him back in 2009, at the White House debt reduction meetings, in which he ran circles around everybody in the room, both Democrats and Republicans, I have watched Paul Ryan. Every time I have seen him , either in an interview or giving a speech, he is fully prepared. You can agree or disagree with his positions, but no one can accuse Paul Ryan of being ill-prepared in his debates. He is also likable. He doesn't destroy his opponents with clever sound bites or personal attacks. He beats them with irrefutable evidence to back up his points. Paul Ryan is a formidable opponent, not to be taken lightly.
The Dems and the Obama White House are saying that they are thrilled with Romney's choice, but I think that the truth is that they are scared spitless with Paul Ryan on the ticket.
This should be a winning ticket for the Republicans. But not so fast.
I have also been browsing Twitter today and the Ron Paul'ers are in an uproar. (Aren't they always?) There are a lot of thing that I like about Ron Paul and his economic policies. I think the GOP would do well to listen to him on those. In fact, some of them already may be based on the recent vote in Congress to audit the Fed. But, on a lot of other issues, I just happen to disagree. The problem with the Paul supporters is that they are like the Obama-zombies from 2008. It's more of a cult-status thing. He is this young generation's "Rocky Horror Picture Show", with a hell of a lot more on the line than dressing up, and remembering to bring toilet paper and newspapers. The selection of Paul Ryan has hit the Paulinists like holy water at an exorcism. It's not just the whining and complaining. We know they're going to do that. It's the number of them pushing for third-party votes and write-in votes.
Others treat him like he's Justin Bieber .
Still others are threatening to move out of the country if Mitt Romney wins the election. Really? So, they're willing to stay in the country if Barack Obama is President, and see Mitt Romney as a bigger threat?
That should tell us all we need to know about some of these people who support Ron Paul. What kind of person would rather let their country collapse under Barack Obama, a person bent on taking us on a path to Marxism/socialism, rather than vote for someone who is not their "perfect" candidate. Yet, they see themselves as some sort of Paul Revere.
Some Paul supporters are legitimately concerned for this country and where it is heading. But they are not, as I far as I can tell, the majority of his supporters.
Many of his supporters who I have talked to and/or interacted with on social sites, are not much different than many of the Obama crowd. Self-centered and self absorbed. These are the "High Times" Paul'ers who really only care about legalizing marijuana and other drugs.
There are also the anti-Semitic Paul'ers who support the Hamas -backed Palestinians, and talk constantly about the "neo-Cons", their term for Jew-loving conservatives. and complain about U.S. Aid to Israel. Notice that they never complain about aid to the PLO, or other countries in the Middle East. Why is that?
Regardless of their reasons, Romney would be well served to give Paul some kind of a role in his administration. Say, overseeing all things at the Federal Reserve. The RNC could also give Ron Paul some time at the GOP convention. This should not be done in a vacuum, though. Paul needs to speak to his supporters and unify them behind Romney for this election. Though their percentages may be small, there are enough to hand this election to Obama, just as Ross Perot ensured Bill Clinton victories in '92 (below) and '96.
Those Ron Paul supporters who end up doing a write-in campaign, or voting for libertarian Gary Johnson, may fashion themselves as Paul Revere, but if Barack Obama wins reelection in November, they will have only succeeded in being Benedict Arnold.
7/23/2012
Is Norah O'Donnell That Stupid?
When is a Tax Hike Not A Tax Hike? When You're An Obama Shill.
Leftists in the media are, more and more, intentional or not, exposing themselves for who they really are. Socialists. Leftists. Statists. Obama zombies. Because they are certainly not journalists.
Norah O'Donnell is, apparently, no exception. Weighing in on an economics discussion on the budget with Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Charlie Rose, O'Donnell and Ryan have the following exchange:
O'Donnell (with a vacant grin): “Congressman, you’re calling them ‘tax policy’ and ‘tax code.’ You’re afraid to call them tax cuts now?”
Rep. Ryan: “They’re not tax cuts, Norah, because they’ve been –” (Laughter)
“Because they’ve been the tax policy for 10 years.”
O'Donnell: “Come on, Congressman!”
Rep. Ryan: “Honestly, Norah. Keeping taxes where they are is not cutting taxes. Preventing a tax increase is preventing a tax increase. It’s not actually cutting taxes,” Rep. Ryan said.
So Norah, how far back should we go back for comparisons? Because, apparently a decade is not far enough. Is the media going to now say that if Obama "adjusts" tax rates to, say 50%, that it is actually a 20% tax cut, because the top rate under Jimmy Carter was 70%?
To answer my own question: Yes! Norah O'Donnell is that stupid! She is that stupid because she thinks that the average person can't see through her complete arrogance, and that her premise doesn't even pass the common sense test.
If O'Donnell isn't careful, people will start to believe that she is there only for her looks, because she certainly isn't demonstrating her superior intellect in these types of exchanges, where her guest actually knows the subject they are being interview about. She comes off looking only foolish and vapid.
Norah O'Donnell Scoffs at Representative Ryan
Posted by Brian
Leftists in the media are, more and more, intentional or not, exposing themselves for who they really are. Socialists. Leftists. Statists. Obama zombies. Because they are certainly not journalists.
Norah O'Donnell is, apparently, no exception. Weighing in on an economics discussion on the budget with Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Charlie Rose, O'Donnell and Ryan have the following exchange:
O'Donnell (with a vacant grin): “Congressman, you’re calling them ‘tax policy’ and ‘tax code.’ You’re afraid to call them tax cuts now?”
Rep. Ryan: “They’re not tax cuts, Norah, because they’ve been –” (Laughter)
“Because they’ve been the tax policy for 10 years.”
O'Donnell: “Come on, Congressman!”
Rep. Ryan: “Honestly, Norah. Keeping taxes where they are is not cutting taxes. Preventing a tax increase is preventing a tax increase. It’s not actually cutting taxes,” Rep. Ryan said.
So Norah, how far back should we go back for comparisons? Because, apparently a decade is not far enough. Is the media going to now say that if Obama "adjusts" tax rates to, say 50%, that it is actually a 20% tax cut, because the top rate under Jimmy Carter was 70%?
To answer my own question: Yes! Norah O'Donnell is that stupid! She is that stupid because she thinks that the average person can't see through her complete arrogance, and that her premise doesn't even pass the common sense test.
If O'Donnell isn't careful, people will start to believe that she is there only for her looks, because she certainly isn't demonstrating her superior intellect in these types of exchanges, where her guest actually knows the subject they are being interview about. She comes off looking only foolish and vapid.
Norah O'Donnell Scoffs at Representative Ryan
Posted by Brian
Related articles
7/05/2012
Ryan: GOP Wins. ObamaCare Gets Repealed. "It's Just That Simple"
Posted by Brian
Breitbart
EXCLUSIVE - PAUL RYAN: WE WIN, WE REPEAL
by JOEL B. POLLAK 5 Jul 2012, 10:16 AM PDT
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), chair of the House Budget Committee--and potential running mate of Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney--told Breitbart News this week that the party’s leaders are “absolutely” committed to repealing Obamacare.
“It would have been nice for the Supreme Court to repeal it for us,” he said, “but it’s no harder today than it was the day before the decision. We win, we repeal. It’s just that simple.”
Continue Reading Here
Breitbart
EXCLUSIVE - PAUL RYAN: WE WIN, WE REPEAL
by JOEL B. POLLAK 5 Jul 2012, 10:16 AM PDT
Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), chair of the House Budget Committee--and potential running mate of Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney--told Breitbart News this week that the party’s leaders are “absolutely” committed to repealing Obamacare.
“It would have been nice for the Supreme Court to repeal it for us,” he said, “but it’s no harder today than it was the day before the decision. We win, we repeal. It’s just that simple.”
Continue Reading Here
Related articles
3/16/2012
Paul Ryan: America Deserves A Better Path
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan of Wisconsin previews next week's FY2013 budget proposal.
You know, I was here -- in Congress -- in 2008 when we had the economic crisis. It was a terrible time. Millions of people lost their jobs. Trillions of dollars of wealth: gone.
That crisis caught us by surprise.
Let me ask you a question: what if your President, your Senator and your Congressman knew it was coming? What if they knew when it was going to happen, why it was going to happen and more importantly, what if they knew what they needed to do to stop it from happening and they had the time to stop it? But they chose to do nothing about it, because it wasn't good politics?
What would you think of that person? It would be immoral.
This coming debt crisis is the most predictable crisis we've ever had in this country. And look what's happening.
This is why we're acting. This is why we're leading. This is why we're proposing - and passing out of the House - a budget to fix this problem: so we can save our country for ourselves and our children's future.
http://budget.house.gov
http://www.facebook.com/reppaulryan
http://www/twitter.com/reppaulryan
Posted by Brian
7/10/2011
Liberal Hypocrite Blasts Rep. Ryan for $350 Bottle Of Wine
This is what it has come down to. Some liberal college professor, eating at a high end DC restaurant, goes on an apparently drunken tirade, excoriating Rep. Paul Ryan for ordering a $350 bottle of wine. Keep in mind that she is eating at the same restaurant that he is. One where the appetizers start at $10.75. AND he paid for the wine and his meal out of pocket. Compare this to Nancy Pelosi charging up over $100,000 on "in-flight" services, including an alchohol tab that would make the late Ted Kennedy drool, to taxpayers. Overall, she racked up $2.1 million over 2 years using a military jet as a personal taxi service. How about John Edwards' $400 haircuts? This professor is typical of the limosine liberals who bitch and complain about "rich" Republicans while holding Earth Summits where attendees feast on lobster and caviar - while talking about ending famine.
Lyberal hypocrisy is alive and well.
Paul Ryan Faces Criticism for Pricey $350 Wine Purchase
Posted on July 9, 2011 at 5:31pm by
House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan and his party were accosted by a Rutgers Professor at a swanky Capital Hill restaurant Wednesday night for their choice to order two $350 bottles of wine with their meal.
“Susan Feinberg, an associate business professor at Rutgers, was at Bistro Bis celebrating her birthday with her husband that night. When she saw the label on the bottle of Jayer-Gilles 2004 Echezeaux Grand Cru Ryan’s table had ordered, she quickly looked it up on the wine list and saw that it sold for an eye-popping $350, the most expensive wine in the house along with one other with the same pricetag.
Feinberg, an economist by training, was even more appalled when the table ordered a second bottle. She quickly did the math and figured out that the $700 in wine the trio consumed over the course of 90 minutes amounted to more than the entire weekly income of a couple making minimum wage.”
Read more at The Blaze
Related articles
- Paul Ryan's $350 Wine v. John Edwards' $400 Haircut (outsidethebeltway.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










