Showing posts with label Debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Debate. Show all posts

10/18/2012

Comrade Obama Contradicts Himself On Capitalism

Posted by Brian

Photo courtesy of www.rushlimbaugh.com
In his second debate with Mitt Romney, Barack Obama told plenty of whoppers, and it was hard to keep up with the sheer volume of lies that crossed his lips.  Pundits and fact-checkers have been poring over them throughout the week.
One statement that Obama made really stuck out though.  It was Obama's "I was against Capitalism before I was for it" moment.
In his closing statement (at the 1:35:10 mark), Obama said the following:

"I believe the free enterprise system is the greatest engine of prosperity the world has ever known."

He is absolutely correct in this statement.  The problem is that this is not what he believes.  He is lying to the American people when he says it.  He believes that capitalism is the root cause of unfairness in the world. How do I know this?  Because he has told us numerous times in the past, all the way back to 2008.  He doesn't believe in capitalism, because he doesn't believe it is fair.  He said that capitalism "doesn't work", and "it has never worked" (video below). He has also stated that he wants to raise capital gains taxes on investors, not because it raises more money (it doesn't), but "for purposes of 'fairness'".
Spoken like a true Marxist!



Obama: Capitalism "doesn't work", "It has never worked".


Obama: Speading The Wealth Around for "Fairness"

Enhanced by Zemanta

10/17/2012

Candy Crowley Comes To Obama's Rescue

Posted by Brian


The ever enticing "Eye" Candy Crowley
A key exchange in last night's debate was "moderator" Candy Crowley siding with President Obama in defending the President as to whether he called the attack in Benghazi, Libya an "act of terrorism" the day after the attack. In a moment in which Mitt Romney was calling Obama out on his failure to call Benghazi a terrorist attack, and Obama clearly stunned, muttering "Carry on", and looking small and whipped, Candy Crowley stuck her big sausage-like fingers into the pie, effectively saving him from a devastating blow to his reelection. Obama took his cue, pounced on the opening provided by Crowley, and the momentum for Romney was ruined. I would think that she should expect a nice bonus check from the Obama campaign for her assist.
To be sure, President Obama did use the term "act of terror" in his statement:


Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks.  We mourned with the families who were lost on that day.  I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed.  And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi. 
As American's, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong the character of our people, and the service of those, both civilian and military, who represent us around the globe. No act of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for.

Yes, Obama did use the term, but only in a general sense, and not in his description of the Benghazi attack.  Elsewhere in his statement when referring to Benghazi, he called it an "attack", "senseless violence",  and a "terrible act".  He only used the term "act of terror" while speaking of America's resolve and character, and to events such as 9/11.

Furthermore, he and his administration refused to call it a terrorist attack for the next few weeks, continuing instead to refer to as as a spontaneous event and blaming a little known YouTube movie trailer which no one had heard of until they mentioned it.  This included millions of Islamists in the Middle East, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and elsewhere who, then aware of the "movie", proceeded to riot.  All after the terrorist attack in Benghazi, and the Administration's statements on the suspect "movie".

Candy Crowley has since said, after the debate, and after her damage had been done, that Romney was correct.  However, as debate moderator, it was unconscionable for Ms. Crowley to step to President Obama's aid, even if she did believe Romney to be wrong.  Note that she didn't speak up on any of the numerous falsehoods that the President put forth.  Nor should she.  A clue that this type of thing might happen came from Crowley herself, who said before the debate, that she was not going to be a "fly on the wall". 

It is because of this kind of stuff that the media garners so much mistrust. It has become apparent to everyone that the moderators in the 2012 debates are not balanced in their 'moderating" , but have clearly chosen sides. Whether it's Candy Crowley, Jim Lehrer (who was most fair), or the forever in gastrointestinal distress Martha Raddatz, it is apparent to all that the deck is stacked. 
Enhanced by Zemanta

10/11/2012

Ryan Needs To Be Prepared For Biden "The Character Assassin"

Posted by Brian
H/T to Mark Levin and The American Spectator

On last night's Mark Levin Show, Mark went over a piece from The American Spectator, which serves as a reminder that the Joe Biden the media portrays, a down-to-earth, everyday, aw shucks, good old boy, is betrayed by his record of attempting to destroy personally, those whom he sees as the opposition.  Not to beat them on their merits, but with vicious character assassinations.
If audio becomes available from his third hour segment, I'll update it here.   For now, the American Spectator article is something which needs to be forwarded to as many people as possible to reaquaint them with the "other" Joe Biden that the media ignores.
As Levin said last night: Paul Ryan would be well advised to be prepared to deal with this "other" Joe Biden in tonight's debate: A man who is vicious, a pure ideologue, one-half of a team that is backed into a corner.  And we all know what animals do when cornered.


Old Smirkin' Joe:
By PAUL KENGOR on 10.10.12 @ 6:09AM
Paul Ryan readies for the Biden Treatment.

I'd like to share a story on Senator Joe Biden that happened 31 years ago, and may be relevant to Biden's Thursday evening debate with Paul Ryan. It involved Biden's international humiliation of a good man, and it became a habit for Biden. I'm confident Biden may aim to repeat the performance with Paul Ryan in the vice-presidential debate, looking to "Quayle" the youthful Wisconsin congressman in a way worse than Lloyd Bentsen might have done.
The "good man" I'm referring to is William P. "Bill" Clark, also known as Judge Clark. Clark, now 80 years old, living in Paso Robles, California, was Ronald Reagan's confidant, closest aide, and single most important adviser in the effort to take down the Soviet Union. He was widely heralded from left to right, from the likes of Maureen Dowd to Lou Cannon to Edmund Morris to Cap Weinberger to Michael Reagan. But before Clark could do the crucial work he did for President Reagan, he had to survive confirmation hearings before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in February 1981.
Continue Reading Here
Enhanced by Zemanta

10/05/2012

Algore Blames Obama Pasting On Altitude

Was Algore Also 'High' The Night Of The Debate?

In perhaps one of the most bizarre (and inane) analyses of any Presidential debates in memory, former Vice President Algore set the bar for stupidity.

On his own Current TV network, Algore  said the following:

"Obama arrived in Denver at 2:00PM, just a few hours before the debate starts. Romney did his debate prep in Denver. When you go to five-thousand feet, and you only have a few hours to adjust, I don't know..."
OH, SHUT UP!

Apparently, Obama wasn't the only one with a little Rocky Mountain 'high" that night. To think this moron was only a little over 500 votes from the Presidency!  It gives me chills.

Al Gore Blames Denver for Obama debate loss

Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama-Zombies - Not Fair Obama Not Allowed To Use Teleprompter At Debates

Posted by Brian
H/T Breitbart

TelePrompter-less Obama: "IT'S NOT FAIR!"

Interviewer: "Was it unfair that President Obama was not able to use his teleprompter in the debate last night"?
Nearly all said yes!
Sad? Pathetic? Scary? This is the mentality of some Obama voters in this country. That they don't even understand that the interviewer's question mocking Obama, and is a total setup is hilarious. These people are so clueless, they don't even suspect that they are being used to expose the utter ignorance of the average Obama-zombie.
Amazing!



Enhanced by Zemanta

10/02/2012

Regardless Of Outcomes, Media Will Spin Debates As Wins For Obama

Posted by Brian

Media Bias To Kick Into Overdrive After Debates

With the first Presidential debate one day away, polls show Mitt Romney and Barack Obama in a statistical dead heat with voters.  At this time, the Presidential race is really down to about 15% of the undecided voters, and those who say that they are still able to be swayed.  It's time for the cavalry to mount up and come to the rescue - the cavalry of course, being the mainstream media. The media are already lowering expectations for Obama, so any decent showing will be declared an Obama success.  Thus, a "win".
If Romney tanks in the debates, it will make it easy for them.  Simply play Romney gaffes on a continuous loop for the next week of so.
However, if Romney does clean Obama's clock, or if the debate is considered close, the mainstream media will kick into high gear, praising Obama's parrying of Romney's points with the mastery of a seasoned politician, while lamenting Romney's performance, calling it 'a missed opportunity with only a few short weeks to right his sinking campaign'.
Even though polls show Romney surging, the MSM will continue with its meme of a troubled Romney campaign, while praising an Obama campaign that, even with highly skewed coverage in his favor, has been feckless in gaining any real traction with voters that is sustainable.
What this really is, is the MSM's last push to get Obama over the finish line. It happened 2000, and again in 2004, as media "analysis" was that both Gore and Kerry had clean sweeps of their debates with Bush.  Though Bush won both elections, the races might have been tighter than they should have been, thanks to wall-to-wall negative coverage of Bush, and sycophantic praise of both Gore and Kerry.
A strong, confident performance by Romney will make it more difficult for them, but so-called non-partisan journalists like 'Pretty Boy' George Stephanopoulos will declare victory for Obama, as he has for every Democrat since joining ABC in 1997.  His analysis was so skewed in the first Bush/Gore debate that it was laughable.  SNL even did a parody of Gore's performance, in which he audibly sighed, and rolled his eyes continuously, and spoke of his famous "lock box" during the debate. No matter, it was a clear Gore win in the eyes of 'Stephie'.
The sad thing, is that there are voters who, even though they come away from the debates with their own opinion of who won or lost the debate, are quickly swayed by the media's 'analysis', which in most cases favors Democrats.


ABC's Stephanopoulos Leads Post-Debate Media Spin for Democrats
By Rich Noyes | October 02, 2012 | 08:50

Leading into tomorrow’s presidential debate, journalists are busy setting expectations for the candidates. On Sunday’s Good Morning America, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos argued that Mitt Romney is under “huge, huge” pressure: “He is behind right now. He is behind nationally, he’s behind in all of the battleground states. This is the last big audience that Mitt Romney is going to have with about four and a half weeks left to go.”
But more undecided voters will be swayed by the media’s post-debate spin about who won and who lost than by any pre-debate expectations. Reviewing the last several campaigns, MRC analysts have found a clear trend of network reporters fawning over the performance of liberal candidates, while harping on any perceived weaknesses or gaffes from conservatives.



Continue Reading
Enhanced by Zemanta

1/20/2012

GOP Debate: Candidates Plans On Illegal Immigration

Romney's Plan To End Illegal Immigration



Newt Gingrich's Plan To End Illegal Immigration



Ron Paul: We Can't Defend Mexican Border While Troops Are On Afghanistan/Pakistan Border



Santorum Challenges Romney On Immigration Stance


Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

11/10/2011

Gingrich Points Out To Moderator The Absurdity Of The Presidential Debate Format

Posted by Brian
One of the reasons that Newt Gingrich is starting to gain traction and surge in the polls is his refusal to take the bait of "moderators" in the GOP debates.  The format of the debates is a set up for all of the candidates.  The questions to the candidates are a series of "gotcha" questions, asked not to help clarify the candidates' position on an issue, but an attempt to illicit a sound bite which can be shown on the morning news shows the following day.
Judging by the audience response to Gingrich's idea for Lincoln/Douglas-style debates, where the candidates can have substantive discussions on the issues, and effectively have a conversation with the voters without a 30-second buzzer, they are tired of the current asinine questions and format as well.
The media continue to think that the American people are stupid, and that they are the purveyors of truth and wisdom when it comes to picking who the President should be.  The American people, though, are very well engaged and are well aware of what these debates are about.  Many Americans say that they are sick of politics and the gotcha style of politics.  Well, it is the media that continues to politicize everything, in the hope that in can catch a politician, or any other public figure, making a verbal gaffe on camera. or with a mic on.
Gingrich is climbing in the polls because he has had the guts in these debates to point out what many of the American people know, and opening the eyes of many others who are now seeing what political hacks many of these so-called "news" people are.


'Absurd' to Give 30-Second Response to Health Care Question, Gingrich Says



(CNSNews.com) - Asked at the Michigan debate to describe their health-care plans in 30 seconds, some of the Republicans tried to do it -- but one balked at answering what he called an "absurb" question.

"Well, I just want to point out, my colleagues have done a terrific job of answering an absurd question," Newt Gingrich said -- prompting laughter. "To say, in 30 seconds --" he began, when moderator Maria Bartiromo sterned interrupted him:

Enhanced by Zemanta