7/19/2011

Ex-Cons To Be The New Civil Rights Battle?

Posted by Brian


Your new Wal-Mart Greeter In San Francisco?
 Ex-Cons in San Francisco May Soon Enjoy ‘Protected Class’ Status

July 18, 2011 - 12:00 am - by Jack Dunphy

A proposed law would bar landlords and business owners from inquiring about the criminal past of any prospective tenant or employee.
 
When I grow weary of being a lonely conservative in Los Angeles, when I get frustrated at living in one of the bluest of cities in the bluest of states, when I begin to despair of being represented by a liberal at every last level of local, state, and federal government . . .
I remind myself it could always be worse in San Francisco.
Read more at Pajama's Media


Enhanced by Zemanta

Nevada DMV - Rejects GOPALIN Plate as Vulgar, Approves Go Obama

Posted by Brian

Nevada man sues DMV over rejection of ‘GOPALIN’ license plate

By Jackie Valley (contact)
Published Monday, July 18, 2011
11:08 a.m.
Updated Monday, July 18, 2011
12:11 p.m.

A Nevada man has filed a lawsuit against the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles alleging his rights were violated when he says the state denied his requests for personalized license plates with conservative political themes.

James Linlor, a Douglas County resident, filed the complaint July 15 in U.S. District Court in Nevada. A state official said the plate eventually was issued late last year.


The complaint alleges Linlor requested a personalized license plate of “GOPALIN” in 2009 and 2010, but the DMV denied his applications, stating the request was "vulgar or obscene or expressing superiority of political affiliation."
Read more at The Las Vegas Sun

Rupert Murdoch Attacked During Testimony To UK Parliament



Posted by Brian

7/18/2011

Obama Provides Clarity - His Destruction Of The Economy Is Intentional

Posted by Brian
(A Democracy) can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.
Alexis de Tocqueville
Does the previous statement sound familiar in the context of what we see going on in government today? Does it make you concerned? Good.  It should.
With one sentence, Barack Hussein Obama provided all the clarity we need to understand that he is totally unconcerned with driving the U.S. economy over the edge of the fiscal cliff.  For those who have been paying attention to what he has been saying for the last three and a half years it does not come as a big surprise.  This simply fits into everything else he has said about "fundamentally changing this country".  He has a deep-seated hatred for the Founders, the Constitution, and everything that this country stands for.  He does not see the success of this experiment we call democracy, which has in a little over 200 years become the most successful country in human history, as something that needs to be admired, but as something to be despised.  He sees the troubles around the world as our fault.  Instead of recognizing the most of the misery around the world is in countries run by despots, he sees American exceptionalism as something negative. His worldview is such that he can't see past his own Marxist ideology that America is exceptional because of the wisdom of the Founders.  A country and government ruled by its citizens ( until recently), who are given the freedom and  liberty to succeed, or fail, based on their own self-determination and self-interest.
The end result of his hatred is to tear the system down to its foundation (fundamentally change) through turmoil - economic, class-warfare, and societal instability.
Eighteen more months of Barack Obama at the helm will, at minimum, leave the country teetering on the edge of financial collapse. A re-election of Obama will see the United States with a Hugo Chavez-style dictatorship before the end of his second term.

Obama: ‘We Don’t Need a Balanced Budget Amendment’

Monday, July 18, 2011
By Fred Lucas

Washington (CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama says America does not need a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, and he once again blamed much of the fiscal problem on Bush-era tax cuts.

“We don’t need a constitutional amendment to do our jobs,” Obama told reporters at his Friday news conference. “The Constitution already tells us to do our jobs -- and to make sure that the government is living within its means and making responsible choices.”
Read more at CNS News


Enhanced by Zemanta

"Oppressor" Israel Teaches Palestinians/Jordanians Desalinization Technology

Posted by Brian

Look how Israel treats the Palestinian Arabs: Part 2
Michael Ordman

I was astonished to discover over 60 positive news stories since July 2010 that never appeared anywhere except in the Israeli press. In this issue, I have just selected the areas that Israel has worked to bring environmental and economic assistance to the Palestinian Arabs.

In the Middle East, water is sometimes more important than blood. In Arab-Israeli peace talks, a whole track is devoted to the issue of fair distribution of water rights. Prior to the six-day war in 1967, most Arabs living in Judea and Samaria had no main water as Jordan was uninterested in providing them access to this vital resource. By 1991, 210 Arab towns in the territories had been connected to a running water system and Israel had transformed their farming using modern irrigation techniques. Just last month (June), Israelis, Palestinian Arabs and Jordanians built EcoCentres to make the most of scarce water supplies. Students from Israel, the PA, Malta, Lebanon, Tunisia, Italy, Greece, Turkey and the UK are working together currently on a project to protect their unique shared ecosystem.
Read more at The Jerusalem Post
Enhanced by Zemanta

Palestinian Arab Population Doubles Under Israeli "Ethnic Cleansing"

Panorama di Gaza CityImage via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian

Look how Israel treats the Palestinian Arabs

Michael Ordman

Contrary to what you may have been told, Israel is not conducting ethnic cleansing or the genocidal destruction of the Palestinian Arabs in Judea and Samaria. How can this be proved? Just look at the population statistics for the number of Arabs in the Territories (2.4 million). Even allowing for claims of PA double-counting, this still represents at least a two-fold increase in the numbers of Arabs in 1967. So if Israel was trying to eliminate these Arabs, they’re doing a pretty poor job of it. In any case, the Palestinian Authority rules in the West Bank Territories, and the Hamas terrorist organization runs Gaza.
Read more at The Jerusalem Post
Enhanced by Zemanta

7/17/2011

ObamaCare Given Thumbs-Up By Top Romney Adviser.

Posted by Brian
h/t to Free Republic

Romney Adviser Backs Obama Health Exchanges

By Jonathan Weisman


Romney appears to tell supporters, "I love you THIS much!'
SALT LAKE CITY — Former Utah Gov. Mike Leavitt, a top supporter and adviser of Republican White House hopeful Mitt Romney, strenuously backed the core piece of President Barack Obama’s health-care law and urged the states to move forward together in adopting health insurance exchanges.
Read more at Wall Street Journal

Enhanced by Zemanta

Democrats: Vote Early. Vote Often.

Marcia FudgeImage via Wikipedia
Posted by Brian
According to Democrats, proving that you are who you say you are prior to voting is tantamount to going back to the "Jim Crow" days. Rep. Steve Cohen says that proving your elligibility to vote is going to hurt the Democrats at the polls.  Well, why would that be? Could it be that Democrats are the ones to benefit most from voter fraud?  Who can forget the 2008 Minnesota Senate race, won by Al Franken, in which it was discovered after the election that in some districts there were more votes cast than there were eligible voters in the district.  Amazingly, nearly all of the fraudulent votes were cast for Franken in a race that was essentially a 50-50 race - a statistical impossibility.
Me thinks the Democrats doth protest too much.

Democrat: Photo-ID Rule Seeks to Keep Poor, Minorities, Elderly and Students From Voting

Friday, July 15, 2011
By Nicholas Ballasy
(CNSNews.com) – Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio) said that every state governed by a Republican is attempting to prevent the poor, minorities, seniors and students from voting by requiring individuals to present photo identification at the polls.
Read more at CNS News



Enhanced by Zemanta

63% Of Democrats Support Stronger Voter I.D. Laws

Posted by Brian

GOP To Push Stronger Voter I.D. Laws, Says ‘Voter Fraud Is Real’

Friday, July 15, 2011
By Matt Cover

(CNSNews.com) – Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus repeated his party’s commitment to stronger voter identification laws, saying that the GOP would not give up the fight against voter fraud.

“I think that we need to make it easy to vote, hard to cheat, and I think that that’s a mantra that we ought to shout from the rooftops all over the country as a Party,” Priebus told conservative bloggers on a conference call on Thursday.
Read more at CNS News

Enhanced by Zemanta

Jane Fonda Still In Denial About Her 1960's Traitorous Ways

Posted by Brian

"Hanoi Jane" mans communist anti-aircraft gun while her countrymen were dying in Vietnam
Jane Fonda: 'I Have Never Done Anything to Hurt My Country'

Saturday, July 16, 2011
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - Actress Jane Fonda said in a statement posted on her website today that the QVC television channel cancelled an appearance they had scheduled with her today to promote her new book "Prime Time," blaming the cancellation on what she called "well funded and organized political extremist groups."

In the same statement Fonda said, "I have never done anything to hurt my country or the men and women who have fought and continue to fight for us."
Read more at CNS News

Enhanced by Zemanta

Is He Serious? Obama Proposals Add $9.5 Trillion To Debt By 2021

Posted by Brian

As President Obama excoriates GOP leaders for not being serious in the debt ceiling negotiations, a new CBO analysis of Obama's proposals show that they will add $9.5 trillion to the debt by 2021.  In fact, every year would have deficits of at least $1.2 trillion - every year! Even if Republicans cave, and agree to raise the debt ceiling by 2.4, it only gets us to mid-2013 before it will need to be raised again.  This is what Obama wants, as it removes this issue from the 2012 election narrative, and puts the next fight off until, what would be, his second term.  An Obama second term would look much different from his first term, where he has to worry about getting reelected.  $1.5 trillion may seem like peanuts compared to what this megalomaniac would do without poll numbers to worry about.
 As a nation we were furious at President Bush for a $458 billion deficit at the end of his second term. The media pounded the deficits numbers into the brains of voters on a nearly daily basis.  Now, the deficit under this President has been averaging over $1.5 trillion per year, over $1 trillion more than Bush's highest year, and they say that the Republicans are playing games?  No more talk from the Democrats and the media of how we need to get our fiscal house in order. Only how much more can we spend to keep bloated programs in place.  Obama keeps coming up with these 5 and 10 year plans, which sound very Soviet-like, when what needs to happen is a 18 month plan to vote this man and his Marxist/Maoist thugs out of office so they can't do any more damage to this country. As it is, it may take decades to undo the damage that they've done in only two and a half years.  Imagine what we would look like after eight years.

Obama's Proposal: Increase Debt Extra $26B This Year, $83B Next Year, $2.7T Over Decade

Saturday, July 16, 2011
By Terence P. Jeffrey

(CNSNews.com) - While the Republican-controlled House of Representatives has voted this year to approve House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan's (R.-Wis.) proposal--that would put the government on a gradual path to a surplus by 2040--and plans to vote on a balanced budget amendment next week that would cap federal spending at 18 percent of GDP, the only budget proposal President Obama's has publicly revealed in 2011 would, according to the Congressional Budget Office, increase the deficit by $26 billion this year, $83 billion next year, and $2.7 trillion over the next decade.
Read more at CNS News

Enhanced by Zemanta

7/16/2011

Obama Acts Like A Spectator In Debt Talks

Posted by Brian

Obama:  80% Of Americans Want Higher Taxes
"Americans support a 'balanced' approach" to debt ceiling solution

The President, once again, went before the cameras to address the contentious nature of the negotiations regarding the looming debt ceiling.  I find it amazing that Obama behaves as if he is a complete outsider in all of this.  This is not an issue that snuck up on anybody.  Back in January there were stories that this was something that the President and Congress were going to have to address.  Instead, this President has stories written about him about how the July 4th weekend marked the end of a 13 week streak of golf outings for the Putter-in-Chief.  If you are the CEO of a company that is on the verge of being unable to meet it's debt obligations, are you spending every free moment sitting down with your board of directors to come up with a plan to meet those obligations, or are you spending weekends at the 19th hole?


His "plan" is that Congress bring him a plan.  In other words, "I am not going to have my fingerprints on anything to do with any plan".  He accuses the GOP of being ideological for the very reason that they were swept into office back in November - to cut spending and not to raise taxes. He is attempting to do the very thing that the Democrats did to Bush I, when they got him to agree to a tax hike after his "Read my lips. No new taxes" pledge.  As soon as he signed the bill, passed by a Democrat Congress, they immediately pointed out that he had broken his campaign pledge.  The rest, as they say, is history.
Where is the President's plan?  It has been over 800 days since Congress has passed a budget - April 2009.   The budget that the President submitted this year was not even viewed as serious.  It was defeated 97-0 in the Senate.  Not even his own party wanted anything to do with it. This fact alone should have had the press asking Obama if he was even marginally engaged with the office that he's been elected to.  If this had been any other president (especially a Republican), and their budget proposal hadn't garnered even one vote, they would have been like sharks circling at feeding time.  But with this President it was barely newsworthy.
Congress has had spending bills - in spades.  Bills that this President has signed. Spending that has increased the national debt by $5 trillion since this President has taken office. So, how is it, that time and again, he goes before the press and the American public and acts as if he is a mere spectator in this whole debt ceiling debacle? He throws about platitudes that the GOP needs to come up with a "big deal".  Have we heard one concrete idea from this President about what he thinks will work? No.  And we won't. He accused the Republicans of being ideologically rigid, yet this whole dog-and-pony show is about maneuvering the GOP into a corner, getting them to accept tax hikes and then use that against them in the 2012 election campaign.  He could care less about the debt ceiling, in the abstract.  If we raise it, he will run the debt up to the next one in record time.  His frustration comes from his inability to get the GOP to bend over and grab their ankles.  His latest obfuscation is to avoid the word "taxes" and instead speak of new ways to "raise revenue", a term now being echoed by all of the media.
The Republicans should know that it is not they, but the President who has been backed into a corner.  There is only one choice: Reduce spending by a minimum of $1.7 trillion, and not over a 10-year period. It needs to be done over the next 18 months.  All items should be on the table, including the one thing which not even been raised - Obamacare.  Congress should vote to defund this monstrosity as soon as possible.  Hold the votes and get them on the record.  Let those who want to hold the line on the status quo run on their voting record. If they think that the American public is satisfied with the amount the government is spending, and are satisfied with the state of the economy, let them run on that.  The Dems won't do this because they know this is a losing issue, and are thus scared to death of what the results would be in next years' election.  Their only move is to get the GOP to capitulate on tax hikes.
Boehner, McConnell, and the GOP have the winning hand here.  They need to realize that, hold firm, and get Obama and the Dems to cut spending.  If they do, the American people will be behind them.
Oh, and press Obama on this issue.  Put him on the defensive so he can't continue to act as if he is some neutral spectator, or the referree of a boxing match. It's his policies which have brought us to this point. Obama and the Dems are the ones who should come out of this politically bloodied.

Enhanced by Zemanta

7/15/2011

England: You Are Entering A Shariah Controlled Zone-Islamic Rules Enforced

Posted by Brian

British Muslims Urged to Reject Democracy, Embrace Shari’a-Ruled ‘Emirates’

Friday, July 15, 2011
By Patrick Goodenough


Part of a poster a Muslim group says it will put up in Muslim neighborhoods in Britain as part of its call for “emirates” to be established under Islamic law. (Image: Muslims Against Crusades)
 (CNSNews.com) – A British Islamic group known for its provocative publicity stunts says a borough in northeast London will be the first target of a campaign to establish “emirates” in the country – Muslim enclaves where shari’a law is enforced.


Waltham Forest, an area identified in the most recent census figures available as having the fifth-biggest proportion of Muslims – 15 percent – of any local authority in England or Wales, has been singled out by radicals behind the group calling itself Muslims Against Crusades (MAC).
Read more at CNS News

Enhanced by Zemanta

7/14/2011

Holder Pressuring Banks To Use Loan Practices That Caused Financial Meltdown

Posted by Brian
In one more example of the Obama Administration not caring one iota about the state of the economy, the Obama/Holder Justice Department is pulling the race card on the banking industry, claiming that they are being discriminatory in their lending practices.  This is the exact same tactic and line of reasoning that the leftists used back in the '90s to relax regulations into giving loans to low income people who would not otherwise qualify for home loans that they couldn't afford.
In the latest incarnation of government interference of lending practices, banks are being told to consider public assistance as income for African Americans. Banks that are targeted by these investigations are capitulating to these outrageous demands for fear of being labeled racist.
What is criminal is that the Adminstration is using the Justice Department to create the exact same scenario which was the catylyst for our current economic mess.  And once again, it will be the poor who are hurt by a policy which sets them up for failure from the get-go.

‘Holder Launches Witch Hunt Against Biased Banks’

By PAUL SPERRY, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

So reads the headline for a recent story in Investor’s Business Daily, which begins, “In what could be a repeat of the easy-lending cycle that led to the housing crisis, the Justice Department has asked several banks to relax their mortgage underwriting standards and approve loans for minorities with poor credit as part of a new crackdown on alleged discrimination, according to court documents reviewed by IBD.” Read the whole article here.
Read more at Investors Business Daily

Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama Admits Social Security "Lockbox" Doesn't Exist

Posted by Brian
Now this is a big f***ing deal!

What Happened to the $2.6 Trillion Social Security Trust Fund?
Merrill Matthews - Right Directions

Here’s how President Barack Obama answered CBS’s Scott Pelley’s question about whether he could guarantee that Social Security checks would go out on August 3, the day after the government is supposed to reach its debt limit: “I cannot guarantee that those checks [he included veterans and the disabled, in addition to Social Security] go out on August 3rd if we haven’t resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it.”


And Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner echoed the president on CBS’s Face the Nation Sunday implying that if a budget deal isn’t reached by August 2, seniors might not get their Social Security checks.

Well, either Obama and Geithner are lying to us now, or they and all defenders of the Social Security status quo have been lying to us for decades. It must be one or the other.
Read more at Forbes

Enhanced by Zemanta

McCain Lapdog Lindsey Graham Mum On If He'd Vote For Tax Increases

Posted by Brian
True to form, Lindsey Graham is out front in trying to derail a show of strength by the GOP in debt-ceiling talks with President Obama and the Democrats.  Graham has been a consistent ally of the Democrats in past legislative impasses.  He appears incapable of holding the line on any negotiations when the going gets tough. Look for Snowe, Collins, and the other usual RINO suspects to start raising the white flag in the coming week. I hope I'm wrong, but I have only his past record to go on, and that record is to cut-and-run. When will the voters of South Carolina cut their losses with "Goober" and finally rid the GOP of this hemorrhoid?

GOP's Graham Won't Say If He'd Accept Tax Increases in Debt Ceiling Deal

Thursday, July 07, 2011
By Patrick Ryan

(CNSNews.com) – Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), one of 12 Republican senators to have signed the “Cut-Cap-Balance Pledge” to cut spending, cap the debt, and balance the budget, would not say whether he will vote for a debt-limit increase that includes tax hikes.
Read More At CNS News

Enhanced by Zemanta

7/12/2011

ATF - WTF?

Posted by Brian

ATF loses track of 1,400 guns in criticized probe
By Todd Schwarzschild and Drew Griffin, CNN Special Investigations Unit

July 12, 2011 9:14 p.m. EDT

(CNN) -- Federal agents can't account for more than 1,400 guns after a widely criticized operation aimed at tracing the flow of weapons to Mexican drug gangs, sources with knowledge of the investigation tell CNN.


Of 2,020 guns involved in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives probe dubbed "Operation Fast and Furious," 363 have been recovered in the United States and 227 have been recovered in Mexico. That leaves 1,430 guns unaccounted for, the sources said.
Read More At CNN Politics

Enhanced by Zemanta

Pelosi Dusts Off Dem Playbook, Entitlement Cuts Hit Women Hardest

SAN FRANCISCO, CA - MARCH 28:  U.S. House mino...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Posted by Brian
The Democrat playbook for demonizing Republicans is as old as the party itself.  Pick an issue and the Democrats, with a compliant media, predictably will tell us that women/minorities/children will be hardest hit. Limbaugh was the probably the first one to make the observation. At least he was the first I heard make that point.  Now it has become a kind of sport for me, trying to determine when the spokesman for the Dems is going to break out the playbook, and which constituency they are going to target to spread fear through.
Today was a banner day for the Dems with Pelosi targeting women, and Obama hitting seniors, veterans, and the disabled all in one fell swoop.
Bravo Dems! I salute your moxie.  Besides that, I despise everything that you stand for.

Nancy Pelosi: Entitlement cuts worse for women

By SEUNG MIN KIM
7/12/11 2:23 PM EDT

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday marshaled a key constituency in her push to protect entitlements: women.

“We know firsthand the impact of changes in Medicare,” said Pelosi, flanked by 14 other Democratic women. “We know it because we are women and caregivers and we know it because of the people we represent. We know it because of the special interest we have taken in this bedrock of security for women and families in our country.”
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58813.html#ixzz1RwoehSgp

Enhanced by Zemanta

Feckless House GOP Fail To Repeal 2007 CFL Law

LONDON - NOVEMBER 16:  In this photo illustrat...Image by Getty Images via @daylife
Posted by Brian
h/t to Mark Levin
John Boehner, bypassing the rules committee and bringing a bill directly to a floor vote, repealing a 2007 law effectively killing the incandescent lightbulb industry, couldn't muster enough votes to get the 2/3 majority needed to pass the measure.  If Boehner had had the bill first go through and pass the rules committee, which is Republican-led, the measure would have passed with a simple majority.  But, for reasons known only to Boehner and the House leadership (way to have his back Cantor!), they bypassed the committee and brought the bill straight to the floor for a vote.  By bringing the bill up, and suspending the rules, the bill required a 2/3 vote to pass.
This is the type of thing that drives me and many of my fellow conservatives absolutely crazy!  I mean, we know that the Senate is screwed up. But the apparent incompetence of the House Republican leadership is both baffling and infuriating!  You can't pass a light bulb bill?!  How in hell do we have confidence that you can go toe-to-toe with a truly vicious trinity of Obama, Reid, and Pelosi?  Note to Boehner, Cantor, McConnell and the rest of you weak-kneed, afraid of my own shadow GOP leadership.  These people play for keeps! They take no prisoners!  They're turning the country into Venezuela, and with a comfortable majority, you can't pass a bill so that we can keep making and buying the Edison light bulb?!
God help us.



JULY 12, 2011, 7:17 P.M. ET
Repeal of Light-Bulb Mandate Fails to Pass House

By RYAN TRACY

WASHINGTON—A measure to repeal a 2007 federal law that would push many traditional incandescent light bulbs off the market failed to win two-thirds support needed to pass in a House vote Tuesday.


A 233-193 majority of the House backed the measure proposed by Rep. Joe Barton (R. Texas), would have repealed a federal mandate that light bulbs meet certain efficiency standards by next year. But the bill was brought up under a procedure requiring that it receive two-thirds vote for passage.
More at the Wall Street Journal
Enhanced by Zemanta

Obama Holding Seniors, Veterans Hostage On Debt-Ceiling Talks

Posted by Brian
Not believing that he could sink any lower, President Obama has reached down into the muck to threaten senior citizens, veterans, and those on disability with withholding their pay checks.  For those who think that this scumbag gives a crap about those on the lower end of the pay scale, this seals the deal as to where he is coming from. Breaking a sacred trust with retirees and veterans goes beyond the pale. He knows that there are non-essential services, in spades, that the government can cut back on in order to meet current debt obligations.  This is mafioso-style or Stalinist behavior. As a veteran, I'm not fearful of this.  I'm pissed!  If he thinks that his Chicago-style politics is going to intimidate us out here in the political heartland, he has made a serious misjudgement.  Jay Carney is out there talking about seniors having to make "Sophie's Choice" type decisions. For those unfamiliar with the movie, Sophie has to decide which of her children is sent to the death chamber and which goes to the concentration camp.  Quite the visual coming from the White House.
These thugs need to be defeated in 2012. Not by a little.  This needs to be an electoral tsunami that leaves no doubt as to the rejection of President Obama, his policies, and of the leftist/Marxist agenda.

Obama says he cannot guarantee Social Security checks will go out on August 3

By Corbett B. Daly
President Obama on Tuesday said he cannot guarantee that retirees will receive their Social Security checks August 3 if Democrats and Republicans in Washington do not reach an agreement on reducing the deficit in the coming weeks.



"I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven't resolved this issue. Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it," Mr. Obama said in an interview with CBS Evening News anchor Scott Pelley, according to excerpts released by CBS News.
More at CBS News

Enhanced by Zemanta