Showing posts with label Executive Order. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Executive Order. Show all posts

1/17/2014

MARK LEVIN on Obama: "The Common Parlance of [a] Dictator"

Posted by Brian

Mark Levin weighed in on Barack Obama's Tuesday press statement (below), saying that Barack Obama is conducting a "gradual, quiet coup" of the government, and based on the statements made by the President, it is hard to see how anyone objectively looking at what he said, and has been saying and doing over the last several years, can disagree.

The Executive Order has been used by Presidents to "help direct officers of the U.S. Executive [Branch] carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office". It has been abused by President's of both parties over the years,  but has been taken to a whole new level by this President, who holds it over Congress like a hammer and sickle, using E.O.'s to write and implement legislation without Congress. According to 343 U.S. 579, 585. Antieau, Modern Constitutional Law,§13:24 (1969), "executive order(s) of the President must find support in the Constitution, either in a clause granting the President specific power, or by a delegation of power by Congress to the President"
The last time I checked, the Constitution does not authorize the President to unilaterally, write, pass, and implement legislation from the Oval Office. Yet that is what he is threatening to do, and has done in the past.

Mark Levin addressed this abuse on Tuesday:

Barack Obama:
“[O]ne of the things that I’ll be emphasizing in this meeting is the fact that we are not just going to be waiting for legislation in order to make sure that we’re providing Americans the kind of help that they need. I’ve got a pen…and I can use that pen to sign executive orders and take executive actions…that move the ball forward.”

Mark Levin:
“He’s just announced that he is going to assume law-making powers. He does not recognize the [Republican Party] majority in the House of Representatives. I don't know how much more clearly he can say it.  You know what this is folks?  You know what this is? This is a gradual, quiet, coup. That's what's taking place. It's gradual. It's quiet in the sense that it's non-violent.  But it's a coup.”

B.O.
“One of the things that I’m going to be talking to my Cabinet about is how do we use all the tools available to us, not just legislation, in order to advance a mission that I think unifies all Americans.”

M.L.
"This is the common parlance of the dictator - assuming that he represents all Americans, that he’s a unifying figure, that we just need to concentrate more power in his hands. He will decide what laws are good, what laws are bad. He will use executive orders to pass laws that Congress won’t pass. And he will ignore laws he doesn’t like, and he’ll rewrite laws that he wants to rewrite like ObamaCare and so forth.  This is the mindset, and the language that dictators have!”


Enhanced by Zemanta

1/16/2013

Be honest...Do you feel Safer??

Posted by Tom

I just read that President Abomination, I mean Obama, just called for the Ban of all Armor Piercing ammunition.  I think that makes perfect sense to the average American, who isn't well versed in the history, bullet performance and most especially, armor piercing bullets.  Let's examine this a little bit further....I'm going to keep the information at a level that's easy for anyone to follow, and it leads to a bigger picture on what's going on....

Background:

First, lets understand that armor piercing handgun ammunition has been illegal since the Gun Control act of 1986.  [18 U.S.C. Section 922(a)(7)]

Here's the code which gives you the actual definition of armor piercing ammunition: [18 U.S.C. Section 921(a)(17)(B) and it states:
(i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium; or
(ii) a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.
The fact that something is or is not classified as Armor Piercing has NOTHING to do with whether or not it will actually penetrate any specific classification of body armor.  

Discussion:

At the point this law was passed, there were an incredibly small number of bullets that met this criteria, namely the KTW and Arcane bullets, but they were never available to the public and were only sold to law enforcement.  Providing you don't consider that point, the law did a great job of solving a problem that never existed.  This is the myth of the term, "Cop Killer Bullets" - the Police were the only ones that possessed them, other than actual developers themselves.  Hence, America became a safer place, as no one could use bullets they didn't have.  There hasn't been one single, documented case that any Law Enforcement Officer has ever had their body armor penetrated by an "armor piercing" handgun bullet, ever.  Not in the history of the United States.

The fact is, most rifles will penetrate the Level IIA and Level II Vests that are worn universally by almost all Police Officers in the United States.  Their vests are designed to stop pistol ammunition, as that is their most likely threat.  Therefore, does that make all rifles bullets then "armor piercing"?  Threat level III and IV body armor, typically worn by SWAT Teams, etc., and is designed to stop approximately 99.5% of all rifle caliber ammunition.

99% of "Armor piercing" ammunition that is in the hands of civilians will fall into one of the two below categories:

Starting in the mid 1980's, commercial importers brought in huge quantities of surplus Chinese military ammunition (7.62x39) that was then sold on the commercial U.S. market.  This ammunition was mostly produced in the 1960's and was favored by shooters because it was reliable and cheap to shoot.  This ammunition was unique in that it had steel core, versus a traditional lead core.  That enabled it to penetrate further in comparison to other ammunition of the same caliber, but had no difference in performance from an average shooters perspective.

The BATFE recognized the increased penetration of these bullets and at some point in the late 90's, made it illegal for dealers to continue to sell it to the public.  Again, sounds reasonable, right?  The fact is, ANY ammunition of the same caliber would have penetrated the vests most commonly worn by your everyday patrolman, but let's continue..

The other type of "armor piercing" ammunition you will generally see is from WWII.  This is most often in the hands of private, specialized collectors or even museums.  This ammunition is designated as M2 AP or known more commonly as the 30-06.  This M2 AP round has a black paint marking on the nose of the bullet to designate it as armor piercing. (Threat level IV body armor, worn by some SWAT Teams, etc., is designed to stop this).

Summary:

99% of the Chinese "steel core" ammunition has since been shot years ago at gun ranges across the country.  A small amount no doubt exists in the hands of those same specialized collectors, he who never throws something away or the other type, the one that keeps it in the event of some "rainy day."

The M2AP round is only available in incredibly small quantities and is very hard to find, even amongst some collectors.  The point here is, the ones that have it are collecting it - not shooting it.


Conclusion:

The owners of either one of these types of ammunition have had it SAFELY in their possession somewhere in the neighborhood of 15 to 70 years.  They've not committed a single documented crime with it or they'd have long ago been locked away, as they should be.  It's in places where it's been safe for decades, in the select hands of a few, trusted folks who have never committed a crime with it.


As a result of this law, existing owners will be forced to do one of the following, before the law takes effect.  Let's see if you can spot the most likely choice:

a.  Turn it over to a governmental agency and receive nothing in return, except scrutiny
b.  Shoot it up at the range where it would cost them 5 times what a regular bullet would.
c.  Sell it to the highest bidder before the law takes effect and let it become the new owners problem
(The price of each bullet is substantial, IF you can even find it, in the neighborhood of $1.00 to $5.00 per bullet)
d. Become a Felon

Most people generally don't throw money away needlessly, especially when there is potential for substantial profit.  What do you think will be the most likely choice by the current, law abiding citizen?

I think most would choose choice "C."  The current holders will sell it to the highest bidder, to someone who doesn't currently have access to any of it, who can't find it on the market, wants to make sure he gets a hold of it before the law takes effect, and is willing to pay a premium for it.

Now, this new owner, having just paid a high price for it, what do you think he'll do with it? 
a.  Race to an Government agency to turn it in and receive an even more focused scrutiny
b.  Shoot it up because he likes a 1000% increase in his ammo bill.
c..  Become a Felon
d.  Hold onto it "just in case."

 What do you think that guy who just bought it will do?


Sounds like a good law huh?.....You be the judge.....

 Wait, I think I just heard Joe Biden in the backround......"maybe we should have talked with those awful, despicable NRA guys a little and they could have told us about this!"

Now even with all of this information and some pretty indisputable FACTS (are they still legal?)  they're now re-examining and noting the composition of bullets that have been around for decades by hunters and target shooters alike.  The next step will be the EPA telling us why that's bad for us and that we need to pay another 500% plus tax on a box of ammunition.  De facto gun control at its best!  Anything for the King of the United States. 

1/15/2013

White House Readies 19 Executive Orders On Gun Control

Posted by Brian

Vice President Joe Biden is saying that the Obama Administration is readying 19 executive orders in preparation for the attack on the Second Amendment.

I believe him.

That said, I don't believe that Obama is going to immediately implement these orders. I don't think that they want that fight - not from Congress, but from the American people.

No, Obama is going to go before the camera's tomorrow, surrounded, of course, by a gaggle of youngsters being exploited to drive home Obama's point that he is only doing this "for the children", laying out these "common sense" steps submitted to him by "plugs" Biden.

Of course, Congressional Republicans led by the feckless Speaker Boehner, and Senate Minority Leader  McConnell, will scream bloody murder of the extremeness of the proposals.  In response, the Regime will keep up the full court press, aided by the usual suspects in the media, saying that the GOP is heartless, doesn't care about our children, and is of course racist for not caring about the large number of minorities who are killed by guns.

It is possible that even under this onslaught, the GOP will hold together and defeat legislation for new gun bans.  More likely is that some sort of "compromise" with the less draconian proposals will occur, which lawmakers will call "common sense" laws.  Obama will then claim victory, saying he's glad that Congress was able to find common ground, that he's glad that something was able to be accomplished, but that there is still work to be done.

Sooner or later, another tragic shooting will occur, which the Obama Administration, with the help of the media, will exploit in order to break out the executive orders he has been keeping on ice, ready to sign.

Unless every one of us who understand and treasure the principles this country was founded upon, stands up, organizes, calls their elected officials, and ensure that our voices are heard, I believe that this could very well be the scenario we will witness.  Or something close to it.

And the uneducated masses will cheer, unaware they are embracing their own descent into tyranny.

Joe Biden: White House eying 19 executive actions on guns

By REID J. EPSTEIN | 1/14/13 6:49 PM EST Updated: 1/15/13 9:46 AM EST
The White House has identified 19 executive actions for President Barack Obama to move unilaterally on gun control, Vice President Joe Biden told a group of House Democrats on Monday, the administration’s first definitive statements about its response to last month’s mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
Continue Reading


Enhanced by Zemanta

1/02/2013

House Overturns Obama Executive Order On Bi-Partisan Vote

Posted by Brian

It's a start.

WHICH OBAMA EXECUTIVE ORDER DID THE HOUSE OVERWHELMINGLY OVERTURN YESTERDAY?
Posted on January 2, 2013 at 9:38am by Erica Ritz

President Barack Obama made waves last Friday when — amid a fierce fiscal cliff debate — he signed an executive order ending the pay freeze on certain federal workers.  Beneficiaries to see a pay boost included Vice President Joe Biden and members of Congress.

Though the raises were relatively modest (at least for a government that runs trillion-dollar deficits)– about $900/year for members of Congress and $6,000/year for Biden– the Weekly Standard writes that the executive order would cost the taxpayer roughly $11 billion over the next ten years.

On Tuesday night, the U.S. House of Representatives approved legislation blocking the pay raise.
Continue Reading


Enhanced by Zemanta

1/03/2012

Shredding The Constitution: WH Says It Will Legislate through Executive Order

Posted by Brian


White House: When Congress Won’t Cooperate, Obama Will Take ‘Small, Medium and Large’ Executive Actions



(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama is ready to take “small, medium and large” actions without the consent of Congress, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said.
Carney on Tuesday explained further Obama’s “We Can’t Wait” strategy of addressing problems without Congress. This would be done through executive orders and other actions Carney said.
Enhanced by Zemanta