In this interview she says states as fact that Republicans would "ensure that we redefine rape as only forcible rape". So consensual sex is also rape, as espoused by radical, man-hating feminist Andrea Dworkin? As an example, she cites H.R.3 - No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act.
H.R. 3 states:
Prohibits the expenditure of funds authorized or appropriated by federal law or funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by federal law (federal funds) for any abortion.
Excludes from such prohibitions an abortion if:
(1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest; or (2) the woman suffers from a physical disorder, injury, or illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would place her in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, as certified by a physician.
This is controversial and anti-woman how?
You have consensual sex. You get pregnant. You get an abortion. You pay for you abortion. No tricks. You take personal responsibility for your actions. I, nor anyone else had anything to do with your getting pregnant. Yet liberals would have us think that is a collective (there's that marxist term again) responsibility to pay for your poor judgement.
Notice that the bill also says that funds for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest are not prohibited, not are they in a life-threatening situation for the mother.
How is any of this "redefining rape"?
Only in the mind of the radical feminist is non-forcible or consensual sex viewed the same as rape.
No comments:
Post a Comment