Liar Wasserman-Schultz Says Christie Not A "Straight Shooter"

Posted by Brian

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz told CNN's Don Lemon that Chris Christie is "not the straight shooter he claimed to be" following the release of e-mails appearing to show that members of Christie's staff ordered three lanes of the George Washington Bridge be closed, snarling traffic, as political retribution against the Democrat mayor of a New Jersey town.
Little Debbie also claimed that Christie was being evasive, and not forthcoming about the events. Don Lemon, to his credit, wasn't letting Wasserman-Schultz off that easily, pointing out that she is quick to take Obama, who has been embroiled in a number of scandals, at his word. “He didn’t know about the NSA spying on allies, he didn’t know about the Obamacare website, he didn’t know that you wouldn’t be able to keep your doctor, so what’s the difference between Christie not knowing and the president not knowing?”
Wasserman-Schultz, who judging by her shifting in her seat, and her body language was clearly prepared to get a free pass from CNN, laughably retorted, "The difference is the issues that President Obama said he didn’t know about were policy issues. This is a scandal!"



I am not a flag waver for Chris Christie and his GOP establishment ways.  In fact, I believe if he is the GOP nominee for President in 2016, it is going to be a disaster of monumental proportions for both the Republican's and the country.
To conclude, I find it more than a little humorous that DWS has the hubris to tackle the forthrightness of anyone, given her track record of lies, race-baiting, and deceit to the American people. (Video and video links of DWS's greatest hits below) 

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Caught Lying On Live TV


Wasserman-Schultz Gets Blitzed By Wolf On False Medicare Attacks
Wasserman Shultz Doubles Down on Lie, Claims She Didn't Say What She Said
Wasserman-Schultz Lies To CNN's Anderson Cooper About Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan
DNC Chair Caught Lying About Obama Super PAC cancer ad - Debbie LIES again
Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's Shocking, Insufficient, Rambling Response to MSNBC on Obamacare Enrollees  (Not a lie.  Just a glaring example of this woman's intellectual vacuity.)

Related articles

• CNN Host Grills Wasserman Schultz About Thinking Christie's Hiding Something While Obama Always Claims to Be in the Dark

Wasserman-Schultz': It Depends On What The Definition Of "Is" Is Moment

Posted by Brian

As if she were channeling William Jefferson Clinton during his Monica Lewinski deposition, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz strained the boundaries of credulity during an interview with Piers Morgan of CNN.
Under questioning from Morgan about Obama Administration statements regarding the Benghazi attacks in which four Americans died, and how they directly contradicted what had actually happened, Wasserman-Schultz said:

Well that doesn't mean it was false. It doesn't mean that it was deliberate.

I guess it depends on what your definition of "is" is.

This is nothing new from DWS.  Her serial lying, and misrepresenting of her opponents words and positions are well documented.  But, it appears even Piers Morgan has had enough of the outright lies  coming from this Administration and the Democrat leadership.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz needs to be defeated in November.  Her constituents, Florida, and the United States deserve much better than what this compulsive liar offers.

Wasserman Schultz: Wrong Statements About Libya Doesn't Mean They Were False



Read Story and Transcript at Real Clear Politics

Related articles

• Wasserman Schultz Caught Lying About Israeli Ambassador's GOP Slam (mediaite.com)
• Karen Harrington Closes Within Five Points of Wasserman Schultz (thegatewaypundit.com)
• #DebbieDoesntKnow: Wasserman Schultz's latest lie sparks pointing and snickering mockery (thebusypost.wordpress.com)
• CNN Grills Wasserman Schultz, DNC (personalliberty.com)

Idiot Of The Day: Wasserman-Schultz - GOP Would Redefine 'Rape'

Posted by Brian

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz must have one hell of a time sleeping at night.  It is inconceivable to me how a person could go out day after day, look the American people directly in the eye, and tell lie after lie after lie.

In this interview she says states as fact that Republicans would "ensure that we redefine rape as only forcible rape".  So consensual sex is also rape, as espoused by radical, man-hating feminist Andrea Dworkin?  As an example, she cites H.R.3 - No Taxpayer Funding For Abortion Act.

H.R. 3 states:
Prohibits the expenditure of funds authorized or appropriated by federal law or funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by federal law (federal funds) for any abortion.
Excludes from such prohibitions an abortion if:
(1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest; or (2) the woman suffers from a physical disorder, injury, or illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that would place her in danger of death unless an abortion is performed, as certified by a physician.


This is controversial and anti-woman how?  


You have consensual sex. You get pregnant. You get an abortion. You pay for you abortion.  No tricks.  You take personal responsibility for your actions.  I, nor anyone else had anything to do with your getting pregnant. Yet liberals would have us think that is a collective (there's that marxist term again) responsibility to pay for your poor judgement.


Notice that the bill also says that funds for pregnancies resulting from rape or incest are not prohibited, not are they in a life-threatening situation for the mother.


How is any of this "redefining rape"?


Only in the mind of the radical feminist is non-forcible or consensual sex viewed the same as rape.