Wasserman-Schultz': It Depends On What The Definition Of "Is" Is Moment

Posted by Brian

As if she were channeling William Jefferson Clinton during his Monica Lewinski deposition, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz strained the boundaries of credulity during an interview with Piers Morgan of CNN.
Under questioning from Morgan about Obama Administration statements regarding the Benghazi attacks in which four Americans died, and how they directly contradicted what had actually happened, Wasserman-Schultz said:

Well that doesn't mean it was false. It doesn't mean that it was deliberate.

I guess it depends on what your definition of "is" is.

This is nothing new from DWS.  Her serial lying, and misrepresenting of her opponents words and positions are well documented.  But, it appears even Piers Morgan has had enough of the outright lies  coming from this Administration and the Democrat leadership.

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz needs to be defeated in November.  Her constituents, Florida, and the United States deserve much better than what this compulsive liar offers.

Wasserman Schultz: Wrong Statements About Libya Doesn't Mean They Were False



Read Story and Transcript at Real Clear Politics

Related articles

• Wasserman Schultz Caught Lying About Israeli Ambassador's GOP Slam (mediaite.com)
• Karen Harrington Closes Within Five Points of Wasserman Schultz (thegatewaypundit.com)
• #DebbieDoesntKnow: Wasserman Schultz's latest lie sparks pointing and snickering mockery (thebusypost.wordpress.com)
• CNN Grills Wasserman Schultz, DNC (personalliberty.com)