Posted by Brian
“but resist we much… we must… and we will much… about… that… be committed.”
Al Sharpton (Watch Below)
Bwahahahahaha! Oh that wacky Al Sharpton!
Speaking to his anemic radio audience, Al Sharpton insinuated that the Republicans stole the Wisconson election on Tuesday by outspending the Democrats, and (wait for it!) suppressing Democrat turnout(?)!
As I posted earlier this week, voter turnout in some Democrat strongholds was reported at over 90%, which not only doesn't sound like voter suppression, it reeks of voter fraud on a massive scale. Not massive enough for Al Sharpton, of course. Turnout need to be not 100%, but over 100%. How else are they going to get candidates like Al Franken elected?
These guys are getting worried, which is going to make for a major effort by Democrats to artificially inflate turnout in November.
Sharpton's greatest T.V. moment:
Showing posts with label Voter turnout. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Voter turnout. Show all posts
6/09/2012
6/06/2012
Voter Fraud Alert: Madison WI Projected 119% Voter Turnout
Posted by Brian
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker fought off opponents for his recall despite initial reports projecting119% turnout in liberal stronghold Madison. That percentage has since been revised down to about 96%, but that number is still unrealistically high.
Democrats have been screaming from the mountain tops that a nationwide push for voter I.D. laws across the country will "disenfranchise" minority voters and that incidences of voter fraud are exaggerated. How is it then, that in the lat several elections, we see hugely inflated turnouts in some liberal bastions, and that the dead and cartoon characters, and dictators show up in registrations and at the polls?
There is good evidence that that is exactly what happened in Minnesota in 2008 when Al Franken won by a mere 312 votes, but over 341 felons, who are ineligible to vote, nevertheless did. This doesn't even count the ballots that were "found" days after the election, which in at least one case, inflated voter turnout the district to over 100%.
A person needs a photo I.D. to buy alcohol, get on a plane, use a credit card, and any number of other everyday mundane things. But to Democrats and the Eric Holder Justice Department, requiring a photo I.D. to vote is to suppress the votes of minorities.
Eric Holder may be right about one thing: it does suppress minority voting. But the minorities are not blacks or Hispanics. The minorities that he refers to are the statistically few, but numerous, corrupt individuals, who taint the integrity of our election process. Holder, though, is not interested in maintaining the integrity of the process. He is interested in the outcome, no matter in the means to get it were corrupt.
American's need to continue to push for voter I.D. laws to restore public confidence in the election process.
REPORT: 119% VOTER TURNOUT IN MADISON, WI
A Madison City Clerk has told a Wisconsin radio host that turnout for the area is expected at over 100%, up to 119%. What makes it all the more interesting is that this story comes from a far-left site.
Continue Reading Here
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker fought off opponents for his recall despite initial reports projecting119% turnout in liberal stronghold Madison. That percentage has since been revised down to about 96%, but that number is still unrealistically high.
Democrats have been screaming from the mountain tops that a nationwide push for voter I.D. laws across the country will "disenfranchise" minority voters and that incidences of voter fraud are exaggerated. How is it then, that in the lat several elections, we see hugely inflated turnouts in some liberal bastions, and that the dead and cartoon characters, and dictators show up in registrations and at the polls?
There is good evidence that that is exactly what happened in Minnesota in 2008 when Al Franken won by a mere 312 votes, but over 341 felons, who are ineligible to vote, nevertheless did. This doesn't even count the ballots that were "found" days after the election, which in at least one case, inflated voter turnout the district to over 100%.
A person needs a photo I.D. to buy alcohol, get on a plane, use a credit card, and any number of other everyday mundane things. But to Democrats and the Eric Holder Justice Department, requiring a photo I.D. to vote is to suppress the votes of minorities.
Eric Holder may be right about one thing: it does suppress minority voting. But the minorities are not blacks or Hispanics. The minorities that he refers to are the statistically few, but numerous, corrupt individuals, who taint the integrity of our election process. Holder, though, is not interested in maintaining the integrity of the process. He is interested in the outcome, no matter in the means to get it were corrupt.
American's need to continue to push for voter I.D. laws to restore public confidence in the election process.
REPORT: 119% VOTER TURNOUT IN MADISON, WI
A Madison City Clerk has told a Wisconsin radio host that turnout for the area is expected at over 100%, up to 119%. What makes it all the more interesting is that this story comes from a far-left site.
Continue Reading Here
Related articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








