Posted by Brian
During the Foster death investigations, like Benghazi, investigators were also thwarted, stonewalled, and unable to perform their jobs
The Fix is in: Hillary’s Benghazi cover-up—like Vince Foster death investigation
Marinka Peschmann - Tuesday, December 18, 2012
If past is prologue expect the Benghazi investigations to be covered up whether or not Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifies. According to Foreign Policy Magazine that despite the House and Senate foreign relations committees having announced she would testify on Benghazi this week, the State Department said last Thursday “that’s not a done deal.” On Saturday, the deal was undone when it was announced that Hillary would not testify due to health issues but would be able to continue to work from home.
Recall how it was Clinton who was one of the first top Obama administration officials to mislead the public by falsely blaming a YouTube video for the deadly attack. President Barack Obama, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and White House Press Secretary James Carney towed-the-line and repeated the same falsehood knowing it would be reported as the truth by the media.
Continue Reading
Showing posts with label Hillary Rodham Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary Rodham Clinton. Show all posts
12/18/2012
10/16/2012
Libya: Chivalry Is Dead In Obama White House. The Buck Stops With Hillary
Posted by Brian
Hillary takes Benghazi bullet for Obama
While it's apparent that Hillary Clinton is attempting to douse the media inferno surrounding the terrorist attack in Libya, and the death of four Americans, Hillary is not only doing damage control for the Regime - she is going back to the Clinton-era tactic of acknowledging a problem, and "taking responsibility" so she can convince the media that it is time to put this unfortunate 'lapse in judgement' behind us. After all, the Obama Administration has an election to win, and they can't have people distracted by this purely political GOP sideshow. It's time for the media to get off of this, and get back to the real business of praising Obama's brilliance, and trashing Mitt Romney.
Of course, this comes just prior to tonight's townhall debate. This will allow "moderator" Candy Crowley the leeway to give Obama cover on the Libya debacle:
Hillary is not so generous to just fall on the sword for Obama, though. She is, after all, a Clinton. No, this is about her just as much as it is about Barack Obama. She is still eyeing 2016 as her final chance to get back into the White House. She is trying to put this behind her, while signaling the American people that she is showing loyalty to her President, and that she has the strength and moral courage to admit she made a mistake, and take responsibility. It's all BS and a dog-and-pony-show, though. If she and this administration were really honest, they would have been upfront from the get-go. Instead, it was an "Aw sh*t" moment for them, and their initial reaction was to lie to the American people. There is no sincerity in this. Hillary and Obama are on their heels because, to their shock, the American people and the media didn't just buy into their lie about a stupid movie and a non-existent demonstration gone bad.
Hillary is doing what she need to do to try to stay viable as a future candidate, and Barack Obama is once-again absolved of taking any responsibility for anything negative that happen in his Presidency.
It doesn't absolve either of them though. This was the three AM phone call for both of them, and both failed to answer it.
Clinton: I'm responsible for diplomats' security
From Elise Labott, CNN updated 10:44 AM EDT, Tue October 16, 2012
Lima, Peru (CNN) -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday tried to douse a political firestorm over the deadly assault on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya, saying she's responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts.
"I take responsibility," Clinton told CNN in an interview while on a visit to Peru. "I'm in charge of the State Department's 60,000-plus people all over the world, 275 posts. The president and the vice president wouldn't be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals. They're the ones who weigh all of the threats and the risks and the needs and make a considered decision."
Continue Reading
Hillary takes Benghazi bullet for Obama
While it's apparent that Hillary Clinton is attempting to douse the media inferno surrounding the terrorist attack in Libya, and the death of four Americans, Hillary is not only doing damage control for the Regime - she is going back to the Clinton-era tactic of acknowledging a problem, and "taking responsibility" so she can convince the media that it is time to put this unfortunate 'lapse in judgement' behind us. After all, the Obama Administration has an election to win, and they can't have people distracted by this purely political GOP sideshow. It's time for the media to get off of this, and get back to the real business of praising Obama's brilliance, and trashing Mitt Romney.
Of course, this comes just prior to tonight's townhall debate. This will allow "moderator" Candy Crowley the leeway to give Obama cover on the Libya debacle:
"I mean, why should we dwell on this now? It's very confusing to the American people (those dopes), and besides, as Hillary said, it's the "fog of war", and things get a bit difficult to understand in the initial hours, days, weeks and months after a tragedy like this. It's really too painful and too early for this discussion in this type of setting. Besides, it's a non-issue! Hillary has taken responsibility (with no repercussions), the FBI is doing their investigation, and we really don't need to speculate until after all the facts come in from the investigation, which will be after the election. Now, let's go to our next question from the audience. To Governor Romney: We have undecided voter Pat, who wants the candidates to assure the American people that the government will take care of the bottom 47%, and that the richest and most fortunate among us are not going to get off without paying their fair share."
Hillary is not so generous to just fall on the sword for Obama, though. She is, after all, a Clinton. No, this is about her just as much as it is about Barack Obama. She is still eyeing 2016 as her final chance to get back into the White House. She is trying to put this behind her, while signaling the American people that she is showing loyalty to her President, and that she has the strength and moral courage to admit she made a mistake, and take responsibility. It's all BS and a dog-and-pony-show, though. If she and this administration were really honest, they would have been upfront from the get-go. Instead, it was an "Aw sh*t" moment for them, and their initial reaction was to lie to the American people. There is no sincerity in this. Hillary and Obama are on their heels because, to their shock, the American people and the media didn't just buy into their lie about a stupid movie and a non-existent demonstration gone bad.
Hillary is doing what she need to do to try to stay viable as a future candidate, and Barack Obama is once-again absolved of taking any responsibility for anything negative that happen in his Presidency.
It doesn't absolve either of them though. This was the three AM phone call for both of them, and both failed to answer it.
Clinton: I'm responsible for diplomats' security
From Elise Labott, CNN updated 10:44 AM EDT, Tue October 16, 2012
Lima, Peru (CNN) -- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Monday tried to douse a political firestorm over the deadly assault on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya, saying she's responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts.
"I take responsibility," Clinton told CNN in an interview while on a visit to Peru. "I'm in charge of the State Department's 60,000-plus people all over the world, 275 posts. The president and the vice president wouldn't be knowledgeable about specific decisions that are made by security professionals. They're the ones who weigh all of the threats and the risks and the needs and make a considered decision."
Continue Reading
Related articles
- Reince Priebus Digs Up Hillary Clinton's 'Buck Stops At White House' Remark (mediaite.com)
- Hillary in 2008: "That buck stopped in the Oval Office" (hotair.com)
- Hillary: Blame Me For Benghazi (townhall.com)
- Hillary Apologizes for Benghazi, But Where's Obama? (commentarymagazine.com)
10/15/2012
Libya: What Is The Obama Administration Hiding?
Posted by Brian
Obama and Clinton Have Created Their Own Watergate
More than a month after attacks in Libya killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the Obama Administration has still not been able, or are unwilling, to be straight with the American people about what went wrong.
There have been cries of a cover up, of incompetence in the Obama Administration, and calls from Congress and the media for this Administration to come clean with the American people about what went wrong that day.
At this point, I don't see that it is going to be that easy. The contradictions between different Administration spokesmen, including obvious attempts to duck and weave their way around questions, has left people with one conclusion: there is a cover up taking place.
This is reminiscent of the days of Nixon and the Watergate scandal. Obviously, the events are completely different, but the manner in which the Obama Admnistration, like the Nixon Administration, has closed ranks in some feeble hope that this whole thing will blow over. But this will not blow over. It has gotten way too big, and way too public for this to get swept under the rug.
Initial report in the news were that there was a demonstration outside the compound over an anti-Islam video on YouTube, and that some had gotten out of control and stormed the embassy (actually a villa), killing the Ambassador and three others.
We now know this to be completely false. We now know that there was no demonstration, nor did it have anything to do with a so-called video. We now know that this was planned, and was a coordinated attack carried out by Al-qaeda islamists to coincide with the anniversary of the 9/11 WTC attacks. We also know that there was intelligence warning of something like this being planned. We also know that Ambassador Stevens had communicated that he had information he was being targeted, and had requested increased security be delivered, which was denied.
There is a cover up, but not due to anything criminal that was done, like the Watergate break-in. This is purely political. The cover up is to shield the Obama Administration, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from claims of incompetence. It highlights their utter failure in foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East. The whole "Arab Spring" thing was supposed to usher in a new dawn of cooperation between the Islamist world and the United States. The were supposed to "love" us. Yet we find, with deadly consequences, that they not only don't love us, or even like us. They still hate us. Worse, any modicum of respect that they once had has been completely squandered by a President and Secretary of State who bend over and grab their ankles before these maggots.
The Islamists may be savages, but they are not unintelligent, They do understand strength. In fact, they even respect it. What they don't respect are those whom they perceive as weak, either morally or militarily. They will never respect us morally, but the problem is, they don't respect or fear us militarily anymore either.
The cover up is this Administration's attempt to save their bacon, and that of Hillary Clinton, in the weeks leading up to the Presidential election. For Hillary, it is about not appearing incompetent ass she keeps her dreams alive for a 2016 run. Up to this point, the coverup is not criminal, but political. However, as more and more persons from this administration are called to testify before Congress, and members of the Administration attempt to stick to the initial lie, criminal charges for perjury may come. It is already being told that the CIA is fed up, and is turning on the administration. They may be patriots, but you can bet you butt that they are not gonna fall on a sword for anybody - especially Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.
The damage being done to Obama has not, in my opinion, been fully felt. Something like this, this close to the election, and which will continue right up to November 6th, may lead to the kind of landslide we haven't seen since 1980.
As for Hillary Clinton, this will probably torpedo whatever ambitions she had for the White House. This was her 4AM phone call, and she not only blew it. She cost the lives of four Americans.
I'm not sure that the Obama Administration could have put a big bow on this and turned it into a positive. But what they have done with all of the lies is turned it into a big steaming mess, and made the Islamic world a much more dangerous place for the U.S. and the rest of the West.
Richard Nixon was not brought down by the Watergate break-in. He was brought down by the lies and the cover up which followed. It appears that either because of arrogance or incompetence, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton either didn't learn that lesson, or simply chose to ignore it.
'Within 24 Hours': When U.S. Intel in Libya Told Washington 9/11/12 Was Terror Attack
By Terence P. Jeffrey October 14, 2012
(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Lindsey Graham (R.-S.C.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on CBS's "Face the Nation" on Sunday that the U.S. intelligence community in Libya informed the administration in Washington, D.C., within 24 hours of the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya that the attack had been a terrorist strike whose perpetrators included militia associated with al Qaeda.
Continue Reading Here
Obama and Clinton Have Created Their Own Watergate
More than a month after attacks in Libya killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the Obama Administration has still not been able, or are unwilling, to be straight with the American people about what went wrong.
There have been cries of a cover up, of incompetence in the Obama Administration, and calls from Congress and the media for this Administration to come clean with the American people about what went wrong that day.
At this point, I don't see that it is going to be that easy. The contradictions between different Administration spokesmen, including obvious attempts to duck and weave their way around questions, has left people with one conclusion: there is a cover up taking place.
This is reminiscent of the days of Nixon and the Watergate scandal. Obviously, the events are completely different, but the manner in which the Obama Admnistration, like the Nixon Administration, has closed ranks in some feeble hope that this whole thing will blow over. But this will not blow over. It has gotten way too big, and way too public for this to get swept under the rug.
Initial report in the news were that there was a demonstration outside the compound over an anti-Islam video on YouTube, and that some had gotten out of control and stormed the embassy (actually a villa), killing the Ambassador and three others.
We now know this to be completely false. We now know that there was no demonstration, nor did it have anything to do with a so-called video. We now know that this was planned, and was a coordinated attack carried out by Al-qaeda islamists to coincide with the anniversary of the 9/11 WTC attacks. We also know that there was intelligence warning of something like this being planned. We also know that Ambassador Stevens had communicated that he had information he was being targeted, and had requested increased security be delivered, which was denied.
There is a cover up, but not due to anything criminal that was done, like the Watergate break-in. This is purely political. The cover up is to shield the Obama Administration, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton from claims of incompetence. It highlights their utter failure in foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East. The whole "Arab Spring" thing was supposed to usher in a new dawn of cooperation between the Islamist world and the United States. The were supposed to "love" us. Yet we find, with deadly consequences, that they not only don't love us, or even like us. They still hate us. Worse, any modicum of respect that they once had has been completely squandered by a President and Secretary of State who bend over and grab their ankles before these maggots.
The Islamists may be savages, but they are not unintelligent, They do understand strength. In fact, they even respect it. What they don't respect are those whom they perceive as weak, either morally or militarily. They will never respect us morally, but the problem is, they don't respect or fear us militarily anymore either.
The cover up is this Administration's attempt to save their bacon, and that of Hillary Clinton, in the weeks leading up to the Presidential election. For Hillary, it is about not appearing incompetent ass she keeps her dreams alive for a 2016 run. Up to this point, the coverup is not criminal, but political. However, as more and more persons from this administration are called to testify before Congress, and members of the Administration attempt to stick to the initial lie, criminal charges for perjury may come. It is already being told that the CIA is fed up, and is turning on the administration. They may be patriots, but you can bet you butt that they are not gonna fall on a sword for anybody - especially Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.
The damage being done to Obama has not, in my opinion, been fully felt. Something like this, this close to the election, and which will continue right up to November 6th, may lead to the kind of landslide we haven't seen since 1980.
As for Hillary Clinton, this will probably torpedo whatever ambitions she had for the White House. This was her 4AM phone call, and she not only blew it. She cost the lives of four Americans.
I'm not sure that the Obama Administration could have put a big bow on this and turned it into a positive. But what they have done with all of the lies is turned it into a big steaming mess, and made the Islamic world a much more dangerous place for the U.S. and the rest of the West.
Richard Nixon was not brought down by the Watergate break-in. He was brought down by the lies and the cover up which followed. It appears that either because of arrogance or incompetence, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton either didn't learn that lesson, or simply chose to ignore it.
'Within 24 Hours': When U.S. Intel in Libya Told Washington 9/11/12 Was Terror Attack
By Terence P. Jeffrey October 14, 2012
(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Lindsey Graham (R.-S.C.), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on CBS's "Face the Nation" on Sunday that the U.S. intelligence community in Libya informed the administration in Washington, D.C., within 24 hours of the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya that the attack had been a terrorist strike whose perpetrators included militia associated with al Qaeda.
Continue Reading Here
Related articles
- JOURNALISM: The NYT kept the Libya hearing off the front page because "It's three weeks before th... (pjmedia.com)
- Hillary Clinton off to Peru amid Libya questions (cnsnews.com)
- Liz Cheney: 'It's Shameful' Hillary Clinton Stood Next To Coffin Of Dead U.S. Ambassador And Lied (mediaite.com)
- Obama's Libya Lies: Worse Than Watergate (rushlimbaugh.com)
- The Latest Shoe to Drop: Obama Regime Withdrew 16 Member Special Forces Team From Libya One Month Before Attack (nicedeb.wordpress.com)
- Libya Cover-Up Vindicates Bachmann (counterjihadreport.com)
- Lindsey Graham: Obama administration misleading, covering up on Benghazi attack (hotair.com)
- BREAKING NEWS: CIA Turns On Obama - Indicating Significant Cover-Up (itmakessenseblog.com)
- Obama's Watergate: State Department falsifies Obama's Benghazi cover-up (winteryknight.wordpress.com)
- Stunning Incompetence: Up To 20,000 Shoulder-Fired, Surface-To-Air Missiles Are Missing In Libya (thedaleygator.wordpress.com)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)





