5/17/2014

Sarah Palin: Obama's Hashtag Diplomacy "Embarrassing", "Teeters Towards Chaos"

Posted by Brian


On Friday, Sarah Palin took the Obama Administration to task for it's "embarrassing" hashtag diplomacy campaign on behalf of the 300 Nigerian schoolgirls kidnapped by the Islamist terrorist group, Boko Haram.
In a Facebook post titled "Obama Twittering Teeters Towards Chaos", Palin rips the Obama Administration a new one, pointedly saying, "Diplomacy via Twitter is the lazy, ineffectual, naïve, and insulting way for America’s leaders to deal with major national and international issues".
She also points out that until now, Barack Obama and the State Department under Hillary Clinton "repeatedly refused to recognize Boko Haram as terrorists despite their conventional, predictable Islamic terrorist rants, training, and mission", but now that these girls are "in a life and death situation", the Obama Administration wants to come to the rescue. "And what is the Obama administration’s weapon of choice in this battle for these young girls’ lives? Hashtagging tweets on social media!"
Palin goes on to add, "I kinda-sorta doubt a tweet will intimidate the kidnappers much. So, if you’re going to jump in and do something about these Islamic terrorists at all, then do it right, do it firmly, and kick their ass", pointing out that like the man pictured below, "winning takes warriors", not trotting out the FLOTUS to hold a sign with a hashtag and a slogan.
Sarah doesn't stop there, addressing the President directly, saying "If you’re going to get involved anyway, Mr. President, learn to understand this and believe it, then announce it: Victory is only brought to you “courtesy of the red, white and blue.” It’s certainly not won by your mere “unfriending” the bad guys on Facebook. Leading from behind is not the American way."


Enhanced by Zemanta

5/16/2014

Just Try To Un-See Debbie Wasserman Schultz' Drunk Selfie!

Posted by Brian






CAUTION: I don't know if it's possible to un-see something.

You may have to wash your eyes out with bleach after viewing the picture below.




Enhanced by Zemanta

Beatdown! It Only Takes Trey Gowdy 3 Minutes To Shame The Media On Benghazi

We've all heard of someone "opening up a can of Whoop-ass" on somebody, but one rarely ever gets the opportunity to actually see it happen. Well, strap in and watch Trey Gowdy do just that to the media, as he asks them a series of basic questions about what happened at Benghazi. Their stunned silence speaks volumes.



Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

5/09/2014

Republican Congressman Destroys 2 Years Of WH Lies About Benghazi In A Minute And A Half

Pete Souza, Official White House Photographer
Where is this photo of the White House situation room on the night Benghazi was attacked?
Pete Souza, Official White House Photographer (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Posted by Brian

Rep. Tom Cotton (R-AR)

"Mr. COTTON. Mr. Speaker, a couple of lessons I learned in the Army were you move to the sound of gunfire, and the most important step in the troop-leading procedures is to supervise the execution of your orders.

When Americans were fighting for their lives in Benghazi, Barack Obama did neither. He sent no Quick Reaction Force, and he didn't even stay in the Situation Room to supervise the execution of his orders. We expect more from lieutenants in the Army than our President gave us that night. For 2 years, he has covered up this failure of leadership by stonewalling. Not anymore. We will now get to the truth. "


Fast forward to 1:25:15 mark for Rep. Cotton's statement.

"But what do our colleagues on the other side of the aisle say to this? They express great outrage at politicizing this matter. When I was leading troops in Iraq in 2006, men and women who were being shot at and blown up by al Qaeda, where was the outrage as they fund-raised endlessly off the Iraq war? Where was the outrage as they viciously attacked our commanders? Where was the outrage when they said that soldiers were war criminals? Where was the outrage when they said the war was lost? Where
was the outrage when they said that only high school dropouts join the Army?

Forgive me if I don't join my Democratic colleagues in sharing their fake outrage. Four Americans lost their lives that night in Benghazi. They deserve justice, and the American people deserve the truth.

One other lesson I learned in the Army is we leave no man behind, and we will not leave these four men behind."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Muslim Brotherhood Document Lays Out Plan To Replace U.S. Constitution With Sharia [VIDEO]

Posted by Brian

A MUST-SEE for every freedom-loving American!

"(http://www.clarionproject.org) The Third Jihad is a film that exposes the threat that Islamic extremism poses to the American way of life. In 1988, the FBI discovered a secret Muslim Brotherhood document which laid out their plans to replace the Constitution with Islamic Sharia law."



"The document stated that "The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers..."

One person who dared to speak out about the Islamist threat is Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a devout Muslim-American who served as an officer in the U.S. navy and also as a physician to the US Congress.

After the FBI released the radical Islamist manifesto describing how to destroy America from within, Dr. Jasser decided to investigate.

The Third Jihad is about what he discovered.

Clarion Project (formerly Clarion Fund) brings together Middle East experts, scholars, human rights activists and Muslims to promote tolerance and moderation and challenge extremism."

Check out Clarion Project's website to learn more: http://www.clarionproject.org

DVD's can be purchased here: http://www.thethirdjihad.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

5/06/2014

FREEDOM OF SPEECH? MA Man Arrested After He Questions School District On Sexual Content Of School Book

Gilford, Ma:  Freedom of speech in The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts is apparently afforded only to those in government, or those who agree to tow the party line.


This is absolutely ridiculous.  Everyone in that room should have been enraged that this man was arrested.  Instead, they all sat like sheep as he was led out of the room by the wrist, like he was a naughty child.  Which is how a good totalitarian government likes you to behave.

I am curious as to why the police officer felt the need to ask him to leave in the first place.  He was not rude.  He was not inciting a riot. He was not even loud.  He was frustrated.  For this he was asked to leave the meeting?

Is this how we are all supposed to behave when we have grievances against the government, be it Congress, the President, or, even a school board or district? The school board sits up at the front like a bunch of politburo members, pretending to hear or grievances, talking in calm, measured voices, explaining to we poor unenlightened hoi poloi how they are going to raise our children in the ways of The State.  We must sit there meekly under the watchful eye of law enforcement, like a bunch of programmed Stepford wives, with no real voice.

Our rights are under assault, and like the people in this meeting, most people are simply sitting there, mouths shut, eyes averted, too intimidated to speak up.

Raw video: Man arrested at Gilford school board meeting - WMUR-TV

Posted by Brian
Enhanced by Zemanta

5/02/2014

Oregon Senate Candidate calls out editorial board for disrespect. Gets kicked out of endorsement meeting.

Posted by Brian



Oregon U.S. Senate candidate Mark Callahan was asked to leave a Willamette Week endorsement meeting after a heated exchange that began when he called out a reporter for writing "Blah, blah, blah" in his notes as another candidate spoke.

This is how you deal with these liberal pieces of crap!




You want to talk about disrespect? I see what you’re writing down there. You just wrote down ‘blah blah blah blah blah’ for everything that Joe Rae said. Joe Rae is a respectable woman. Why are you not respecting her by writing ‘blah blah blah blah blah’ on your notepad?

WW: Right now we're going to move on. I'm going to ask you a question and if you answer  respectfully we might endorse you.

Callahan: "You have to give respect in order to get respect. Right now on that side of the table, you’re not giving very much respect to the five of us and our time here."

WW: HEre's my question. Climate change.  Do you believe its a myth or reality?

Calahan; “It's a myth.”

WW: Where do you stand on the Easter bunny?

Callahan: "Are these really the questions I was called here to answer? I called you out for putting ‘blah blah blah blah blah’ on your notepad and now you’re asking me questions like this? Really? Are we talking about this now?"

"Okay how about you ask a very serious and respectful question instead of asking a little childish question."

WW: "I'd like to move on to someone else. If you’re not going to let me I’m going ask you to leave. That’s two strikes.”

Callahan: “Who do you think you are?”

WW: “You’re done here. This is neither a fair or balanced meeting. This is a meeting for us to decide…”

Callahan: “I know it’s a meeting being asked by disrespectful thin-skinned liberals like yourself.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Benghazi: Dude, this scandal isn't going away!

Posted by Brian

Every once in a while, and seemingly more often these days, some of those in the Obama Administration let slip exactly how they feel about their true agenda, and their worldview.



Such is the case with former National Security Council spokes-dope, Tommy Vietor. Appearing on Fox' 'Special Report with Bret Baier', Vietor gave everyone a front row seat into the cavalier attitudes that permeate this White House and the Administration.  Pressed by Bret Baier about who changed the Benghazi talking points that Susan Rice was sent out to deliver on the Sunday morning talk circuit, Vietor said he couldn't remember, then flippantly tossed out, "Dude, this was like two years ago".

This is his reaction to the brutal murders of four Americans? His mood was one of being perturbed that he even has to be there to answer any questions.



You can bet that his attitude, and the Administration's, isn't any different for our military men and women in Afghanistan or Iraq, except how it affects them politically.
"Dude, this was like two years ago." "What difference at this point does it make?" These answers give the public a glimpse into exactly how these elitists view those who serve and give the ultimate sacrifice for their country.

Most of the investigating has been focused the talking points Susan Rice delivered on the Sunday shows, and who changed them.  No one has asked why it was Susan Rice giving them instead of then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.  One of those murdered was a State Department employee and supposedly good friend of Hillary's, Christopher Stevens. She seems to be the obvious choice.

Why?  Because Hillary couldn't get bloodied up by this fiasco.  It has been well known that Hillary is the presumptive 2016 Democrat Presidential candidate.  Hillary couldn't go out there and deliver an obvious lie about some little known YouTube video which created demonstrations, eventually leading to the attack on the embassy and the death of four Americans.  So little known was the video, that it wasn't until AFTER Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama apologized for it, that demonstrations broke out all across the Muslim world in reaction to it.

Nor could Hillary go out and tell the truth about what happened.  That Ambassador Stevens saw the deteriorating security situation, had requested additional assets, and which Hillary and the State Department had turned down, also couldn't be admitted to.

Instead, Hillary disappeared for a week, the cover story that she fell and hit her head.  No evidence was produced of what doctor she saw or if she ever saw one. The media just accepted it at face value. Case closed.

Benghazi was an event that had, and still has, huge political ramifications.  It happened right in the middle of Obama's reelection campaign, and if mishandled, could sink his reelection.  For that reason, he could be nowhere near it. That portion of the coverup has been, thus far, complete. No one outside of the Oval Office even knows where Obama was at after 5:30PM on the night of the attacks.  How is that possible?  Americans are under attack, and the Commander in Chief is AWOL until sometime the following morning, when he's flying to a fundraiser? Either he was derelict in his duty as Commander in Chief during an act of war being waged on American people and assets, or the Administration was caught flat-footed, and his response bungled so badly that they couldn't let the American people or anyone else know it.

There's still news to come out on the U.S. running guns through Qatar, and arming al-Qaeda rebels in Libya, and possibly Syria.

With Nixon, it wasn't the break-in which brought him down, it was the coverup.  For Obama, Hillary, and others, it may be all of the above…Dude.

Enhanced by Zemanta
There was an error in this gadget